Committee Reports::Report No. 10 - Examination of the effectiveness of Irish trade promotion abroad::28 March, 2007::Report


Tithe an Oireachtais

An Comhchoiste um Fhiontraíocht agus

Mionghnóthaí

An Deichiú Tuarascáil

Scrúdú ar éifeachtacht chur chun cinn thrádáil na hÉireann thar lear agus ar na Gníomhaireachtí Stáit atá ag gabháil dó.

Márta 2007

Houses of the Oireachtas

Joint Committee on Enterprise and Small Business

Tenth Report

Examination of the effectiveness of Irish trade promotion abroad and the State Agencies involved

March 2007

CHAIRMAN’S FORWARD

The Joint Committee on Enterprise and Small Business agreed as part of its Work Programme for 2005 to undertake an examination of the effectiveness of Irish Trade Promotion Abroad and the State Agencies involved.


The Joint Committee appointed Senator Terry Leyden as rapporteur to undertake such an examination and to report back to the Joint Committee. Senator Leyden’s report has made a number of recommendations in regard to the future of Irish trade promotion abroad and the State Agencies involved in this area. The report was considered by the Joint Committee and adopted at its meeting on Wednesday 28th March 2007.


The Joint Committee wishes to record its thanks to Senator Terry Leyden for the excellent work he has carried out in the preparation of this report.


______________________


Donie Cassidy TD


Chairman


28th March 2007


This report was prepared by


Senator Terry Leyden, Rapporteur


on behalf of the


Joint Committee On Enterprise and Small Business.


Table of Contents


 

Page


1) Introduction and Recommendations


4


2) General Overview of the Export Sector in Ireland


6


3) Role of Government Departments


10


4) Role of Export Bodies in Promoting Irish Exports


17


5) Performance of Irish Export Promotion Bodies


12


6) Giving a Common Face to Export Promotion


23


7) Investment in Education


26


8) Internet Sales and Broadband Connection


30


9) Opportunities at the Olympics


34


10) Conclusion and Acknowledgements


37


10) Bibliography


39


1) Introduction and Recommendations

I am pleased to present this report to the Joint Committee on Enterprise and Small Business. I was appointed Rapporteur to the Committee to examine and report on the effectiveness of Irish trade promotion and marketing and new opportunities for Irish companies.


The report looks at existing trade promotion and makes proposals for future developments and business opportunities.


I hope that this report will give rise to a debate on this vital area of our national interests.


During the course of my research it has been apparent that new approaches are needed to respond to significant changes in world markets. There are significant regulatory changes like the single market in the E.U., World Trade agreements and there has been a big shift in geographic prosperity and economic growth, for example the rise in prosperity in China, India and Brazil.


Irish exporters face new opportunities and new threats from these changes. In general


Ireland has been coping very well with these and good planning and foresight will help us to continue to do so. However, this means that we must continually adapt and change, both in what we produce and supply and also in how we promote and market ourselves overseas. Our current approach of attracting foreign investment and also encouraging home-grown new businesses seems to have been the right one and we should continue in this vein. Nonetheless, we need to review how we assist these businesses to grow their business abroad.


I would like to contribute the following recommendations:


1.The amalgamation and consolidation of state-sponsored export promotion bodies ought to be considered. This report has outlined some of the issues and pointed in particular to overseas offices as one important face to the Irish export sector for which consolidation may have benefits. All of the agencies should operate from one location and the local embassies should be closely interlinked with their efforts.


2.Representatives from each of the organisations discussed in this report need to attend the seminars of and get involved in the National Trade Forum in order to realise the potential of the Forum as a guiding authority for future trade policies.


3.Second Level Education should include an option of Asian languages. Asia is the fastest growing economy in the world. This may become a necessity for all countries in years to come, therefore Ireland should be one of the leaders of this.


4.The link between education and economic performance is widely accepted, Ireland has to continue to promote adult education and on the job training for employees in order to reach the OECD average.


5.The continuous growth of broadband users and online business transactions must be supported and developed.


6.The London 2012 Olympics offers massive opportunities for Irish business and tourism promotion so businesses need to compete early for the highly sought after contracts.


Senator Terry Leyden


March 2007


2) General Overview of the Export Sector in Ireland

Export growth has accounted for much of the growth in the economy over the past 15 years. As Figure 1 shows, the rise in Irish exports has matched national income growth closely over this time period. A large part of both growth in exports and in overall economic growth has been foreign direct investment (FDI), notably from the investors residing in the U.S.


Figure 1 — Real value of Irish exports; real Irish economic growth (GNI over time)



Source: CSO


At present, there is every indication that the export sector is continuing its good run. While there was a drop in exports in 2003/2004, this was largely a result of decline in certain commodity groups, notably heavy machinery and transport equipment. In 2005, exports from Ireland were valued at about €89,000 million, representing 5.3% growth from the previous year. Figure 4 shows the distribution of export value by importing region.


As can be seen from Figure 2, goods exports are still largely driven by the chemicals industry, followed by machinery and transport equipment and sundry manufactured goods.


Figure 2 — Breakdown of value contribution to total goods exports by broad category


Category

% Total Exports (2006)

Food and live animals

7.55%

Beverages and tobacco

1.14%

Crude materials, inedible, except fuels

1.56%

Mineral fuels, lubricants and related materials

0.65%

Animal and vegetable oils, fats and waxes

0.02%

Chemicals and related products

46.83%

Manufactured goods class. by material

1.86%

Machinery and transport equipment

25.22%

Miscellaneous manufactured articles

11.35%

Commodities & transactions not classified

2.58%

Unclassified estimates

1.24%

Source: CSO


Agricultural products come fourth, and have been in more-or-less steady decline in terms of overall importance, as Figure 3 shows. With the scaling down of CAP subsidies and further pressure of globalisation it is likely that this trend will continue into the future.


Figure 3 — Agricultural Exports as a percentage of total exports (1995 — 2003)



Sources: Department of Agriculture; CSO


Growth in exports of services has increased considerably, with a 13% growth rate for 2004. Roughly 35% of service exports (the largest category by far) are computer services, representing a value of €14,972 million in 2004.


Tourism as a percentage of total exports of services is falling in importance, accounting for only about 9% of all exports in 2004. Factors which may account for this are the loss of competitiveness of the Irish hospitality sector and the effects of September 11th on demand for transatlantic tourism.


In terms of the destinations for Irish exports, a marked and persistence feature has been the steady decline since the foundation of the State in the importance of Britain as a market for Irish goods. Growth markets have been in Europe, the Rest of the World, and to a lesser extent the U.S. Figure 4 shows the current distribution of destinations by value for 2005.


Figure 4 — Export value by region importing


Destination

Exports (millions of €’s) Euros)

Great Britain and Northern Ireland


15,429.5


Other EU Countries


41,183.8


USA


16,547.9


Rest of World


15,802.2


Total (2005)


88,963.4


Source: CSO


While exports in general have been booming, the performance of the indigenously owned export sector has been dwarfed in the 1990s. The share of Ireland’s industrial exports made by indigenously-owned firms fell from 26% of the total in 1991 to 12% by 1998. In 2004, the share was virtually the same, at 12.4%.


As Figure 5 illustrates, Ireland places not only heavy reliance on exports comparative to its EU partners (highest Export Value: GDP ratio), but also on exports outside the EU. In this, it is second only to the Netherlands.


Figure 5 — Exports by destination as a percentage of National Income (2004)



Data source: Forfas (2006)


Source: Forfás (2006)


In summary, the export sector has played a vital role in the success of the Irish economy in recent years. Exports of goods — particularly chemicals and machinery but also computers — remain the strongest component of export performance, but exports of services are also important. Agricultural exports are diminishing in importance. The role of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in the success of the Irish export sector can hardly be overstated. Foreign-owned firms exhibit a greater propensity to export and have outperformed indigenously-owned firms on export markets.


3) The Role of Government Departments

A) An overview of the role of relevant Government departments is an essential component to any report on trade. As the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment has many functions in relation to supporting exporters, it is necessary to divide the Department as follows:


Bilateral Trade Section


The Bilateral Trade Section or Unit of the Department is the section with main responsibility for the promotion of Irish exports on world markets. (The Department also maintains a “Multilateral Trade Section” whose main role is to determine Ireland’s trade policy in relation to external fora, such as, the EU and the WTO). This is achieved by working closely with State agencies and other Government departments, in particular Enterprise Ireland, Forfás and the Department of Foreign Affairs, in the development and coordination of the programme of Ministerial-led overseas trade missions and other promotional events, and assisting in the coordination of inward trade related visits.


The Unit also facilitates the coordination of direct Government-to-Government contacts, whether formal or informal, and ensures that any difficulties that may arise can be addressed. This is a key function which allows for many mutually beneficial agreements to be decided.


The Unit compiles up-to-date and comprehensive data on exports and imports with our main trading partners (in association with the Central Statistics Office) and maintains close contact with the Irish based embassies of these countries.


Trade Missions


Each year the Unit coordinates in the region of 20 Ministerial-led trade missions to other countries. These involve high-level meetings with Ministers and officials, an extensive range of meetings for participant Irish companies with the aim of developing contacts and/or finalising contracts/joint ventures with partner companies in that country and also developing an awareness of Ireland as a supplier of world-class goods and services.


The range of countries visited reflect both the need to provide support in important established markets and to assist companies to further develop their export potential and diversity by accessing emerging markets, particularly those in Eastern Europe and Asia.


National Trade Forum


The National Trade Forum (NTF) was established in 2005 to replace the former Trade Advisory Forum and provides a forum for discussion on the future agenda for developing trade policy. It is coordinated by Forfás, with the assistance of the Bilateral Trade Unit. The inaugural meeting engaged senior representatives from industry, the social partners and NGOs in a discussion on key trade policy issues. There was a positive response to the establishment of the Forum and to the trade research that has already been undertaken by Forfás. Research themes that have been identified include:


-Assessing the relationship between trade and productivity;


-Identifying the latest outward direct investment (ODI) trends and the merits of ODI;


-Identifying opportunities offered by the World Trade Organisation (WTO) for Irish services companies; and


-Developing a better understanding of the trade performance of services sectors.


It is envisaged that meetings of the Forum will be held every 18 months to take stock of intervening developments, to report on the findings of research and to discuss new research areas. Attendance at these meetings should be encouraged; with a wider spectrum of interests their submissions will be enhanced.


Joint Commissions


A Joint Commission is a formal Bilateral Intergovernmental Forum dealing with trade development in all its aspects, mercantile and services. Its role is to further the development of economic and business cooperation, including scientific and technological cooperation and it provides a forum for discussing issues between the two countries involved. Ireland has formal Joint Commissions with China, Russia, Saudi Arabia and South Korea. In 2006, formal sessions of the Joint Commissions with China and Russia were held. Progress was made on a range of trade related issues and this initiative should continue to be supported.


Foreign Earnings Committee:


The Foreign Earnings Committee (FEC) brings together representatives of all of the Government Departments and State promotional agencies with responsibility for overseas commercial promotion to ensure that there is adequate coordination of promotional efforts and to bring issues of concern to the attention of relevant authorities. The FEC has been re-structured to improve its effectiveness. A meeting of the revamped FEC took place on 29 November, 2006 at which it was agreed that the Committee continued to play a worthwhile role while recognising the need to constantly review its modus operandi and structure.


The Department has several other areas of responsibility with regards to Export Credit Insurance, the OECD Investment Committee and as an Instrument of Pre-Accession Assistance (IPA) and European Neighbourhood & Partnership Instrument (ENPI) groups.


Licensing Unit


The Licensing Unit of the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment operates Ireland’s export control system, in cooperation with a number of Government Departments and agencies including:


The Department of Foreign Affairs, which is consulted on all military license applications and on dual-use license applications where foreign policy considerations apply.


The Revenue Commissioners, whose Customs and Excise officers have the lead role in the enforcement of export controls.


The goal of the Unit is to operate an efficient and effective export licensing system in accordance with Ireland’s obligations as a participating state in the International Export Control Regimes. At the same time however, we aim to have a regulatory environment which does not impede companies engaged in legitimate trade.


The objectives of the export control system are:


To prevent the export of goods that could be used in nuclear and other weapons of mass destruction


To prevent the export of military goods to countries whose behavior is a threat to international and regional peace


To prevent the export of goods that could be used to violate human rights or exacerbate internal conflict in the country of final destination


To prevent the export of goods that could be subsequently diverted for purposes other than their stated end-use


To comply with restrictions imposed by internationally agreed trade embargoes


The Licensing Unit imposes a licensing requirement for the export of military goods, dual use goods and goods that may be used for capital punishment, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. It also imposes export controls that have been authorised under United Nations (UN), Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) and/or EU Sanctions.


Export controls are imposed on both finished products and on components, and also on technical services associated with the controlled goods. However some goods may be exempted from controls, for example software that is generally available to the public or information such as basic scientific research that is in the public domain.


B) The role of the Department of Foreign Affairs is of high importance in cultivating strong liaisons with governments abroad and encouraging exports by promoting Ireland’s trade, investment and other interests, including its culture;


The Department of Foreign Affairs website lists the functions of the Bilateral Economic Relations Division as:


working closely with the State Agencies and other Departments in identifying new market opportunities and in promoting awareness of Ireland as a preferred business partner and as a world-class location for educational services, investment and scientific research and development;


using the resources of our Embassies to assist Irish business in gaining and maintaining access for their goods and services;


highlighting the benefits of inward investment in Ireland as a gateway to Europe; and


working to realise the objectives set out in the next phase of the Government’s Asia Strategy.


Positive government relations with the administrations in centrally planned economies are of particular importance. Ireland’s Asia Strategy assigns responsibility to the Department of Foreign Affairs, the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment, other Government Departments and State bodies to develop the relationship between Ireland and eight priority Asian countries — China, Japan, Korea, Singapore, India, Malaysia, Indonesia and Vietnam. The strategy aims to intensify the levels of political, business and other forms of interaction with these countries so that Ireland benefits to a significantly greater extent from trading with the region. Specific developments in relation to the targets of this Strategy include: an additional 30 Irish companies establishing a presence in the priority countries; a significant increase (to 7,500) in the number of third level students coming to Ireland; and significant increases in food and drink exports. During 2006 Enterprise Ireland organised a total of 46 events to promote exports there.


Overall, the Bilateral Assistance Programme has proved to be a useful and cost-effective tool for developing bilateral relations, as well as a meaningful engagement in aiding governance. The Programme will continue as the beneficiary countries will require assistance and advice for some years to come. (Business 2000, 9th Edition)


Local initiatives such as trade missions are backed by Irish Embassies. These initiatives are varied and can include visits by Irish experts and seminars/workshops in the target countries. The table below lists a selection of Ambassadors and locations.


Figure 6— Selection of Embassies and Locations


Country

Ambassador

City

Argentina

Philomena Murnaghan

Buenos Aires

Australia

Máirtín Ó Fainín

Canberra

Austria

Frank Cogan

Vienna

Belgium

Brian Nason

Brussels

Brazil

Michael Hoey

Brasilia

Bulgaria

Geoffrey Keating

Sofia

Canada

Declan Kelly

Ottawa

China, People’s Republic of

Declan Kelleher

Beijing

Cyprus

Tom Brady

Nicosia

Denmark

Joe Hayes

Copenhagen

Egypt

Gerard Corr

Cairo

Finland

Antóin Mac Unfraidh

Helsinki

France

Anne Anderson

Paris

Germany,Federal Republic of

David Donoghue

Berlin

Greece

Margaret Hennessy

Athens

Hungary

Martin Greene

Budapest

India

Kieran Dowling

New Dehli

Iran

John Deady

Tehran

Israel

Michael Forbes

Tel Aviv

Italy

Seán Ó hUiginn

Rome

Japan

Brendan Scannell

Tokyo

Malaysia

Eugene Hutchinson

Kuala Lumpar

Poland

Declan O’Donovan

Warsaw

Portugal

James Brennan

Lisbon

Russian Federation

Justin Harman

Moscow

Saudi Arabia

Tom Russell

Riyadh

South Africa

Colin Wrafter

Pretoria

Spain

Peter Gunning

Madrid

Sweden

Barrie Robinson

Stockholm

United Kingdom

Dáithí Ó Ceallaigh

London

United States of America

Noel Fahey

Washington D.C.

Vietnam

Brendan Lyons

Hanoi

Source: Department of Foreign Affairs


Reference needs to be made to the valuable role which our embassies play in our national exporting effort. In most countries they are very well positioned to be of assistance. By and large, it is the experience of our successful exporters that our embassies can be very helpful and they use their services whenever necessary. In certain locations Enterprise Ireland operates from the same offices, which is to be encouraged.


4) Role of Export Bodies in Promoting Irish Exports

There are five key organisations which play an important role in export promotion in Ireland. They are:


Enterprise Ireland, formerly known as An Bord Tráchtála or the Irish Trade Board, is the main statutory body with specific responsibility for export promotion in Ireland. Their five main areas of activity are:


Achieving export sales


Investing in research and innovation


Competing through productivity


Starting up & scaling up companies


Driving regional enterprise


Enterprise Ireland also includes what were once the Institute of Industrial Research and Standards and the home industries division of the IDA (Forbairt). There was an opinion that the overseas role became quite diluted in the new entity which was somewhat more inward looking and company focussed instead of outward looking and market focussed. This has now been addressed and a new division has recently been established in Enterprise Ireland which focuses on overseas selling and marketing. This development is to be commended. It represents a return to the original structure which served Irish exporters very well over the decades since the original Export Promotion Act in the 1950’s.


Historically, Enterprise Ireland has always had a focus on small-business development, arising from a specific mandate from government to this effect. This, in turn, is most likely in response to a perception by policy-makers that smaller, indigenously-owned exporters have performed poorly in comparison to larger Multinational Enterprises (MNEs), and hence there is a perceived need to provide superior resources to the former client group.


In terms of funding, Enterprise Ireland is almost wholly reliant on Oireachtas Grants, comprising over €232 million or 86% of total income in 2005. The remaining income sources include own resources, comprised largely of professional fees, rental income and income from dividends1.


Enterprise Ireland facilitates the achievement of its aforementioned objectives through financial support to industry (€160 million in 2005). This comes in three forms


1)Company Development


2)Third Parties


3)Science & Technology Development


Of these, the greatest emphasis (51%) is placed on Science & Technology Development, in line with current policy thinking on the role of technology in retaining competitiveness in the economy (see, for example Forfás Report on Competitiveness, 2006).


Enterprise Ireland also maintains an extensive network of market offices throughout the world, representing a considerable portion of its staffing costs and giving a broad face to Irish industry in the markets of interest.


The Industrial Development Authority (IDA) is the government body responsible for supporting and promoting industry and enterprise in the State generally, but also has a role is export promotion in that the encouragement of foreign direct investment is often closely related to export growth. Like Enterprise Ireland, the IDA has a network of offices to give Irish industry a face in the wider world.


Chambers Ireland also plays a crucial role in the functioning of the export sector. While their primary purpose is in lobbying government, they also operate an International Business Services section, which provide crucial information to exporters and potential foreign buyers and — perhaps most importantly — facilitate the issuance of Trade Documentation. Chambers Ireland are the accredited issuers of Certificates of Origin, the vital documents needed to meet customs requirements in importing states. Chambers Ireland is not a statutory body, and is funded by members’ contributions, fees from professional services and other revenues. It is important to note the federal structure of Chambers Ireland, meaning that individual chambers enjoy a large degree of autonomy within the national structure.


1 Enterprise Ireland Annual Report 2005 op cit.


Bord Bia, the Irish Food Board, also plays a role in export assistance, insofar as it coordinates Irish participation in Trade Fairs and provides information to potential buyers about Irish companies in the food industry. In addition, Bord Bia has offices in major cities in Europe and the US designed specifically to promote the Irish food industry abroad.


Bord Iascaigh Mhara, the Irish Fisheries Board, acts in a similar capacity to Bord Bia, but specifically for the promotion of exports of seafood. Like the other statutory bodies involved in export promotion, BIM is largely funded by Oireachtas Grants. In terms of overseas operations, BIM has offices in Paris, Düsseldorf and Madrid from which export promotion is coordinated.


The Irish Exporters Association (IEA) is a member-funded body that provides information to members engaged in international trade, produces research on exports and the export sector, and lobbies government for more favourable policies towards the export sector.


Shannon Development is a regional development organisation funded by central Government which is responsible for the integrated development of tourism, manufacturing and trade in the Shannon Region. It was formed in 1959 to promote the use of Shannon International Airport and is Ireland’s only dedicated regional economic development agency.


Tourism Ireland was established as the common external face for Fáilte Ireland and the Northern Ireland Tourism Board, under the terms of the Belfast Agreement of 1998. It has a role in marketing the Irish tourism product to overseas customers, and maintains a network of overseas offices in Europe, North America and Australia.


5) Performance of Irish Export Promotion Bodies

There are a number of comprehensive studies on the effectiveness of export promotion schemes in Ireland. Three such studies are Bell (1997) and McDonnell & MacAleese (2000), both studies being somewhat dated; and a more recent (2004) expenditure report specifically on the performance of the network of overseas offices maintained by Enterprise Ireland, conducted by the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment2.


Bell focuses on the export promotion activities of An Bord Tráchtála (ITB) — now Enterprise Ireland — in comparison with the activities of similar agencies in Finland and Norway, and contrasts the three with other countries where export promotion has been less effective, such as the United Kingdom. He concludes that the Irish model has been largely successful. In particular, he finds the focus of ITB on the small-to medium-sized enterprises has been well placed, because it has closed the information gap needed for these (largely indigenously-owned) enterprises to compete in uncertain markets. In general, he identifies four positive roles of An Bord Tráchtála in export promotion:


Providing exporters with information about foreign markets


Promoting Irish enterprises at international trade fairs


Providing information to foreign importers about Irish companies and products


Providing grants and financial support to incubate new exporters


It is important to bear in mind, however, that this study is based on the performance of export promotion in the early to mid 1990s, a time in which the Irish economy was in transition.


McDonnell & McAleese focus more on general theoretical arguments about the role of export promotion in economies in transition. In particular, they address the question as to whether export promotion is more effective if organised through state bodies such as Enterprise Ireland or the IDA, or whether private business-for-business organisations like Chambers Ireland or the IEA would not do a better job. They find the evidence is mixed, but they do point out that business for business organisations tend to be seen as more accessible and less bureaucratic than government or semi-state agencies.


2 See: Expenditure Review of Enterprise Ireland’s Overseas Office Network, op cit.


The Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment’s 2004 report focuses specifically on the role of overseas offices and finds, based on the information supplied by EI itself, that the offices have met and indeed exceeded their targets consistently since 1999.


In terms of the actual evidence of successes provided by the performance of the organisations which benefit from industry-specific export promotion, it is quite difficult to disentangle the effects of overall trends and individual business characteristics from the effects of export promotion itself. There is some cause for scepticism, however, regarding the value of export promotion in modern Ireland. In general, there is agreement in the literature that export promotion benefits economies in transition above all. But in modern Ireland, where deep business links are already in place and the economy is one of the most open in the world, it is questionable how effective export promotion can be. As a general trend, the firms which have been performing best are those who receive the least support in terms of export promotion. These are foreign-owned MNEs and internationally-focused Irish enterprises operating on a large scale. In particular, it is highly unclear to what extent the activities of sector-specific state bodies like Bord Bia and BIM have contributed to export growth in their respective industries. Agricultural exports have been in relative decline for the past 15 years (see above), while the fisheries industry in Ireland has experienced an equivalent decline, despite substantial investment in fleet stock. (See figure 7)


Figure 7 — Percentage share of fish and seafood exports to total exports



Data source: CSO


6) Giving a Common Face to Export Promotion

We need a focused export body with strong leadership and its own budget — called ‘Export Ireland’


-Eoin O’Driscoll, Chairman of Forfás (2004)


The recommendation for a common face to export promotion was made by Forfás in their 2004 publication Ahead of the Curve: Ireland’s Place in the Global Economy. In the same year, the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment conducted a review of export promotion with a focus on Enterprise Ireland’s overseas offices3 and found, similarly, that the establishment of an export ‘Network’ was called for, in which closer links between overseas offices of EI and industry bodies was identified as a specific target of the Network.


The value of providing a consistent export promotion service is well documented in the studies. It is important that the resources to exporters and potential foreign importers alike are consistent across industries, in order to minimise search costs and avoid unnecessary delays in coordinating services. On the other hand, this must be balanced against the specialised knowledge which industry agencies may be assumed to have of the needs of their particular industry. A potential strategy for integrating industry agencies into a broader export body such as Enterprise Ireland should therefore pay special attention to the need to maintain niche knowledge bases within the overall agency structure.


Beyond knowledge management and coordination, there may be potential gains to integrating export services through cost effectiveness arising from the integration of offices. In particular, the maintenance of foreign offices for industry agencies such as Bord Bia and BIM exhibits considerable overlap with the foreign offices of Enterprise Ireland, as can be seen from Figure 8. In particular, attention can be drawn to the case of Bord Bia, which has four of its eight foreign offices at addresses distinct from those of other agencies in the same city.


3 See: Expenditure Review of Enterprise Ireland’s Overseas Office Network, op cit.


Figure 8 — Overseas offices of state-supported export promotion agencies


 

Enterprise Ireland

Bord Bia

IDA

BIM

Amsterdam

1

1

1

 

Atlanta

 

 

1

 

Berlin

1

 

 

 

Boston

1

 

1

 

Brussels

1

 

 

 

Budapest

1

 

 

 

Chicago

 

1

1

 

Copenhagen

1

 

 

 

Dubai

1

 

 

 

Düsseldorf

1

 

 

1

Frankfurt

 

1

1

 

Glasgow

1

 

 

 

Guangzhou

1

 

 

 

Hong Kong

1

 

 

 

Kuala Lumpur

1

 

 

 

London

1

1

1

 

Los Angeles

1

 

 

 

Madrid

1

1

 

1

Milan

1

1

 

 

Moscow

1

1

 

 

Mountain View (California)

 

 

1

 

New York

1

 

1

 

Paris

1

1

 

1

Prague

1

 

 

 

Riyadh

1

 

 

 

Seoul

1

 

1

 

Shanghai

1

 

 

 

Silicon Valley

1

 

 

 

Singapore

1

 

 

 

Stockholm

1

 

 

 

Sydney

1

 

1

 

Taipei

 

 

1

 

Tokyo

1

 

 

 

Vienna

1

indicates office shared

Warsaw

1

indicates office separate

Washington

1

 

 

 

Sources: Annual Reports (2004, 2005)


An amalgamation of resources on the export promotion front need not be equated with the downgrading of a particular institution per se. As figure 8 illustrates, there are a number of key markets in which sector-specific agencies are not currently represented. By further consolidating resources, it may be possible to provide desk space to industry export agents in existing Enterprise Ireland or IDA foreign offices.


In terms of the divide between State promotion agencies and private-sector organisations, there are likely to be very considerable obstacles to any proposed amalgamation. As McDonnell and McAleese observe, private-sector organisations not only benefit from greater flexibility and approachability to the business community, but also avoid the problematic surrounding conflicts of interest which may arise between government and the exporters themselves. It may be considered unfeasible and undesirable, therefore, to attempt to dramatically alter the current roles of Chambers Ireland or the IEA in export promotion.


7) Investment in Education

Investment in education is now seen as critical to supporting economic, social and cultural development in Ireland, and as a strategic component of national planning. Not surprisingly, education is one of the key elements of Ireland’s National Development Plan.


Irish students perform in the top sectors in international studies which compare with students from other countries. This availability of a well-educated workforce presented Ireland with a major competitive advantage when multinational companies were looking at potential locations for their overseas operations. The success in attracting this mobile investment into Ireland has proved the cornerstone of the economic success of recent years.


However, in order to retain our competitive advantage education and training in certain areas needs to progress. Firstly, our trade with Asian countries continues to grow steadily, (see table below) assisted by the terms set out in the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment’s 10 year Asia Strategy.


Figure 9— Total Exports to Singapore, Hong Kong and China 2003-2005


€Thousands

 

DATE

 

 

 

 

ORIGDEST

2003

2004

2005

GRAND TOTAL

 

Singapore

734,247

866,408

775,698

2,376,353

 

Hong Kong

688,298

832,881

640,167

2,161,346

 

China

584,976

639,212

909,982

2,133,870

 

 

2,007,521

2,338,501

2,325,847

6,671,569

Source: CSO


So as to continue the trade with Asian Tigers it is recommended that an Asian Language be taught at Second Level. In June 2005 the Expert Group on Future Skills Needs launched its report Languages and Enterprise, its findings include:


Foreign language skills will be important to the successful future development of enterprise in Ireland, with any deficit in this area resulting in firms failing to achieve their full potential.


There was little evidence of a current deficit in the availability of language skills, but the report highlighted the prospective future benefits for exports and foreign direct investment, flowing from an increased emphasis on language skills by the State and enterprise.


The profile of languages currently being studied in the public education system has arisen in an ad hoc manner and owes more to historical factors than any analysis of the needs of earners and the State.


Future policy on languages should take account of patterns of migration into Ireland. The pool of foreign language capability created by immigration should be recognised and utilised as a resource.


Considering the findings, the merits of introducing an Asian language as an option at Second Level should not be ignored.


The second area in which education ought to improve would be In-Employment Education and Training. The OECD graph below shows Ireland in tenth position with regards to worker training.


Figure 10— Differences in Adult Learning Participation



Source: OECD


The EGFSN published its report, In-Employment Education and Training in Ireland, in April 2005. Those already in the workforce will play an increasingly critical role in meeting the future skills needs of the Irish economy. This study, published in April 2005, focuses on continuing vocational education and training (CVET) of those at work and provides analysis of expenditure, participation and access, providers, certification, educational attainment of those at work and comparative indicators of CVET. The study also covers both public and private expenditure, provides an international comparison of in-employment education and training and indicates where gaps exist in the current availability of relevant data.


The report confirms that participation is strongly related to previous educational attainment in all forms of continuing education and training - the higher the level of educational attainment the greater the rate of participation in vocational education and training. The report provides base data for some aspects of the National Skills Strategy Research (Forfás Annual Report 2005).


More support to businesses is required to encourage staff-training in Customer Service, Sales and marketing and areas related to the company.


8) Internet Sales and Broadband Connection

The role of the internet in business must also be discussed. Virtually all enterprises use computers in one way or another today: 99% in industry, 95% in construction and 96% in services. The majority also use e-mail and the internet while 64% of all enterprises reported that they have a website or homepage. See Tables.


According to the CSO e-Commerce and ICT Survey, the top three reasons for providing a website were:


1.Marketing the enterprise’s products


2.Facilitating access to product catalogues and pricelists and


3.Providing after sales support.


Figure 11 Percentage of enterprises with e-commerce sales via the internet or EDI- 2006



Source: CSO- e-Commerce and ICT Survey


Companies must be encouraged to overcome the barriers to taking their business on-line. The main concerns for those already selling on-line is whether customers are ready to shop on-line and security problems concerning payments. For those not selling on-line, the main barrier they perceive is that their products were unsuitable for on-line sales. See Figures 12 and 13.


Figure 12 Barriers to e-commerce- Enterprises with internet sales



Source: CSO- e-Commerce and ICT Survey


Figure 13 Barriers to e-commerce —Enterprises without internet sales



Source: CSO- e-Commerce and ICT Survey


Irish households reported a lower level of broadband uptake than their EU counterparts. Just 26% of households with an internet connection in 2006 used broadband, compared to an EU average of 62%.


Between 2005 and 2006, the percentage of Irish enterprises with a broadband connection increased from 48% to 61%. The EU average for 2006 was 78%.


Enterprises that use broadband are more likely to show greater levels of e-business activity and higher degrees of integration of their ICT systems. While the number of broadband subscribers has increased from 176,300 in the second just over 372,000 in the second quarter of 2006, the Government need to continue to promote the advantages that broadband offers.


Figure 14 Households with a broadband connection as a percentage of households with Internet access at home, 2004-2006



Source:Eurostat.


Ireland will only continue to prosper if it is accepted that broadband is strategically important to our economy. Competitive broadband products and services have to be available to all households and businesses.


It is necessary to note that another consequence of the advance of the internet is that previously the Irish Trade Board and others played a crucial role in providing market information, business contacts, and group promotional services to underpin exporter’s efforts. However, the arrival of the Internet has meant that the exporters can do much of this themselves and their needs have changes as a result. They need advice instead of information and the agencies and departments must adapt. The support agencies should perhaps provide more help to exporters use the internet more productively to expand their business overseas.


9) Opportunities at the Olympics


The procurement of the Olympic Games in 2012 by our neighbours in London opens up many opportunities for Irish Exporters over the next five years. Olympic build programmes are estimated to be worth over stg£7 billion over the next five years. GDP in the UK in 2012 is expected to be £1,067million (South East of England Development Agency). The timeline below shows that work has already begun but that there are many prospects for companies still opening up.


Figure 15 Timeline of Works for London 2012



Source: Olympic Delivery Authority


Excellent opportunities will become available for exporters of goods and services. Billions of Euro will be spent to regenerate London’s East End and on services during the Games. Advertising Ireland as a holiday destination to the millions of visitors in the UK will attract tourists to this country during the Olympics and in the years following them.


2007 sees the beginning of the Olympic Delivery Authority awarding contracts to business. Some of the major contracts will only be available to large corporations but as time goes on smaller companies will be able to compete for the lesser contracts. The table below shows the organisations responsible for managing the Olympic Games.


Table 16 — Organisations and their Responsibilities


Organisation

Responsibilities

Information

Olympic Delivery Authority (ODA)

Delivery of permanent facilities and infrastructure

www.oda.gov.uk

London Organising Committee of the Olympic Games (LOCOG)

Delivery and staging of the games

www.london2012.com

London Development Agency (LDA)

Purchasing and preparing land required for the Olympic park

www.lda.gov.uk

Transport for London (TfL)

London’s transport system organization

www.tfl.gov.uk

International Olympic Committee (IOC)

Owner of the Olympic franchise

www.olympic.org

Source: London 2012


The Lower Lea Valley in East London will be the site on which the 500 acre Olympic Park will be constructed. Opportunities before the Games begin will consist mainly of infrastructure, venue restoration and construction and site clean up and preparation. The location has been quite neglected in previous years therefore there are many opportunities for business: seventeen existing venues need to be re-developed and nine new venues need to be built. Remodelling of rivers and canals and their surrounding areas and bridge building are also required.


The amount of goods and services that will be required during the Games will be mammoth. According to official London 2012 literature, in the Athletes’ Village alone, 100 tonnes of meat, 75,000 litres of milk, 25,000 loaves, 350 tonnes of fruit and vegetables and over a million bottles of water will be consumed. Ireland is in one of the best locations to provide these goods.


Irish exporters must not be left behind while other countries take advantage of the extraordinary demand to be satisfied just across the Channel. Businesses have got to be encouraged to take the initiative to compete for tenders as the international competition will be fierce.


10) Conclusion

This report has outlined several means of promoting Irish exports. It is clear that export promotion represents a useful mechanism by which government and the business community can overcome informational deficits and provide nurturing support to potential exporters. However, I must remark that export success is much more driven by the economic fundamentals which determine the overall health of the economy.


Given the results of this report, it is worthwhile to consider which resources might be devoted by government to encouraging positive conditions in our export-orientated economy. Such mechanisms should include:


Increasing cooperation between the trade bodies in relation to export objectives and programmes.


Keeping wage costs as low as possible. This is a key factor to sustaining the presence of MNEs which contribute to export growth in the economy.


Investing in education. Well educated workers and managers will likely have the human resources required to adapt to foreign markets. Proficiency in a wide range of foreign languages is a necessity in today’s global village.


Enhancing the knowledge infrastructure of the economy. Investments in broadband internet and other communications resources are vital to the complete integration of the Irish economy into the global information age.


Taking advantage of all opportunities arising abroad and maintaining positive relationships with the assorted governments so that Ireland is in a position to avail of all upcoming prospects.


I look forward to the recommendations and observations made in this report being discussed and considered by the Joint Committee on Enterprise and Small Business and a wide range of policy-makers.


Acknowledgements

I would like to thank the following departments, agencies and people for their support and assistance during the compilation of this report:


The Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment, especially Ms. Laura Allen and Mr. Brendan McCormack.


The Department of Foreign Affairs.


The Central Statistics Office.


The Oireachtas Library and Research Service, especially Mr. Graham Stull.


Enterprise Ireland.


Forfás.


Bord Bia.


IDA Ireland.


Chambers Ireland, especially Mr. Sean Murphy.


The Irish Exporters Association.


The Clerk of the Joint Committee on Enterprise, and Small Business, Mr. Eoin Faherty.


My personal assistant, Mr. Karl Whitney, Doctoral Scholar at the UCD Humanities Institute of Ireland.


Particular acknowledgement to Miss Alma Byrne, MA in Public Affairs and Political Communication, who has been of invaluable assistance in the preparation and presentation of this report.


10) Bibliography

Bell, J “The Role of Export Promotion Organisations” in Competing from the Periphery: Core Issues in International Business Fynes, B & Ennis S (eds.) (1997) The Dryden Press, London


Bord Bia Annual Report 2005 Laid before the Houses of the Oireachtas (2006)


Bord Iascaigh Mhara Annual Report 2005 Available online at: http://www.bim.ie/uploads/reports/BIM%20Annual%20Report%202005.pdf


Central Statistics Office, Information Technology and Communication 2006. Available online at: http://www.cso.ie/releasespublications/documents/industry/2006/ictireland2006.pdf


Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment A Decade of the Asia Strategy, 1999-2009 available online at: http://www.entemp.ie/trade/bilateral/asiastrategy.htm


Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment Expenditure Review of Enterprise Ireland’s Overseas Office Network (2004) available online at: http://www.entemp.ie/publications/enterprise/2004/eiexpenditurereview.pdf


Enterprise Ireland Annual Report & Accounts 2005 Laid before the Houses of the Oireachtas (2006)


Fáilte Ireland Annual Report 2005, available online at: http://www.failteireland.ie/publications_archive


Forfás Annual Competitiveness Report 2006, available online at: http://www.forfas.ie/ncc/reports/ncc_annual_06/webopt/ncc061010_acr_report_2006_webopt.pdf


Forfás (Enterprise Strategy Group) Ahead of the Curve: Ireland’s Place in the Global Economy (2004) available online at: http://www.forfas.ie/publications/esg040707/pdf/esg_ahead_of_the_curve_full_report.pdf


Forfás International Trade and Investment Report 2005, available online at: http://www.forfas.ie/publications/forfas060220/webopt/forfas060220_trade_and_investment_webopt.pdf


IDA Ireland Annual Report 2004 Laid before the Houses of the Oireachtas (2005)


McAleese, D and O’Donnell, M, “Institutional Support for Exporting: Issues and Evidence”, in A. MacBean (ed.), Trade and Transition: Trade Promotion in Transitional Economies, London, Frank Cass, 2000, pp. 18-28


Roper, S and Love, J The Determinants of Export Performance: Panel Data Evidence for Irish Manufacturing Plants (2001) Northern Ireland Economic Research Centre, available online at: http://www.erini.ac.uk/Publications/PDF/Rwp69.pdf


Websites

www.buyusa.gov/UK


www.chambers.ie


www.dfa.ie


www.entemp.ie


www.london2012.com


www.oecd.org


www.skillsireland.ie


Members of the Joint Committee on Enterprise and Small Business

Deputies:


Martin Brady


(FF)4 (Vice-Chairperson)



Pat Breen


(FG)5



Joe Callanan


(FF) (Government Convenor)



Donie Cassidy


(FF) (Chairman)



Tony Dempsey


(FF)



Phil Hogan


(FG)



Paddy McHugh


(Ind)



Breeda Moynihan-Cronin


(Lab)6 (Opposition Convenor)



M. J. Nolan


(FF)



Ned O’Keeffe


(FF)7



Ruairí Quinn


(Lab)8


Senator:


Paul Coghlan


(FG)



John Hanafin


(FF)



Terry Leyden


(FF)



Joe O’Toole


(Ind)9


4Martin Brady T.D. replaced Conor Lenihan T.D. by Order of the Dáil on 16 November 2004.


5Pat Breen T.D. replaced Gerard Murphy T.D. by Order of the Dáil on 20 October 2004.


6Breeda Moynihan-Cronin T.D. replaced Kathleen Lynch T.D. by Order of the Dáil on 18 May 2006.


7Ned O’Keeffe T.D. replaced Ollie Wilkinson T.D. by Order of the Dáil on 17 February 2005.


8Ruairí Quinn T.D. replaced Brendan Howlin T.D. by Order of the Dáil on 18 May 2006.


9Senator Joe O’Toole replaced Senator Shane Ross by Order of the Seanad on 6 July 2006.


Committee on Enterprise and Small Business Orders of Reference

Dáil Éireann on 16 October 2002 ordered:


‘(1)(a)That a Select Committee, which shall be called the Select Committee on Enterprise and Small Business, consisting of 11 members of Dáil Éireann (of whom four shall constitute a quorum), be appointed to consider —


(i)such Bills the statute law in respect of which is dealt with by the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment;


(ii)such Estimates for Public Services within the aegis of the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment; and


(iii)such proposals contained in any motion, including any motion within the meaning of Standing Order 157 concerning the approval by the Dáil of international agreements involving a charge on public funds, as shall be referred to it by Dáil Éireann from time to time.


(b)For the purpose of its consideration of Bills and proposals under paragraphs (1)(a)(i) and (iii), the Select Committee shall have the powers defined in Standing Order 81(1), (2) and (3).


(c)For the avoidance of doubt, by virtue of his or her ex officio membership of the Select Committee in accordance with Standing Order 90(1), the Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment (or a Minister or Minister of State nominated in his or her stead) shall be entitled to vote.


(2)(a)The Select Committee shall be joined with a Select Committee to be appointed by Seanad Éireann to form the Joint Committee on Enterprise, Trade and Employment to consider —


(i)such public affairs administered by the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment as it may select, including, in respect of Government policy, bodies under the aegis of that Department;


(ii)such matters of policy for which the Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment is officially responsible as it may select;


(iii)such related policy issues as it may select concerning bodies which are partly or wholly funded by the State or which are established or appointed by Members of the Government or by the Oireachtas;


(iv)such Statutory Instruments made by the Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment and laid before both Houses of the Oireachtas as it may select;


(v)such proposals for EU legislation and related policy issues as may be referred to it from time to time, in accordance with Standing Order 81(4);


(vi)the strategy statement laid before each House of the Oireachtas by the Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment pursuant to section 5(2) of the Public Service Management Act, 1997, and the Joint Committee shall be so authorised for the purposes of section 10 of that Act;


(vii)such annual Reports or annual Reports and accounts, required by law and laid before both Houses of the Oireachtas, of bodies specified in paragraphs 2(a)(i) and (iii), and the overall operational results, statements of strategy and corporate plans of these bodies, as it may select;


Provided that the Joint Committee shall not, at any time, consider any matter relating to such a body which is, which has been, or which is, at that time, proposed to be considered by the Committee of Public Accounts pursuant to the Orders of Reference of that Committee and/or the Comptroller and Auditor General (Amendment) Act, 1993;


Provided further that the Joint Committee shall refrain from inquiring into in public session, or publishing confidential information regarding, any such matter if so requested either by the body concerned or by the Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment; and


(viii)such other matters as may be jointly referred to it from time to time by both Houses of the Oireachtas, and shall report thereon to both Houses of the Oireachtas.


(b)The quorum of the Joint Committee shall be five, of whom at least one shall be a member of Dáil Éireann and one a member of Seanad Éireann.


(c)The Joint Committee shall have the powers defined in Standing Order 81(1) to (9) inclusive.


(3)The Chairman of the Joint Committee, who shall be a member of Dáil Éireann, shall also be Chairman of the Select Committee.’


Seanad Éireann on 17 October 2002 ordered:


‘(1)(a)That a Select Committee consisting of four members of Seanad Éireann shall be appointed to be joined with a Select Committee of Dáil Éireann to form the Joint Committee on Enterprise and Small Business to consider —


(i)such public affairs administered by the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment as it may select, including, in respect of Government policy, bodies under the aegis of that Department;


(ii)such matters of policy for which the Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment is officially responsible as it may select;


(iii)such related policy issues as it may select concerning bodies which are partly or wholly funded by the State or which are established or appointed by Members of the Government or by the Oireachtas;


(iv)such Statutory Instruments made by the Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment and laid before both Houses of the Oireachtas as it may select;


(v)such proposals for EU legislation and related policy issues as may be referred to it from time to time, in accordance with Standing Order 65(4);


(vi)the strategy statement laid before each House of the Oireachtas by the Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment pursuant to section 5(2) of the Public Service Management Act, 1997, and the Joint Committee shall be so authorised for the purposes of section 10 of that Act;


(vii)such annual Reports or annual Reports and accounts, required by law and laid before both Houses of the Oireachtas, of bodies specified in paragraphs 1(a)(i) and (iii), and the overall operational results, statements of strategy and corporate plans of these bodies, as it may select;


Provided that the Joint Committee shall not, at any time, consider any matter relating to such a body which is, which has been, or which is, at that time, proposed to be considered by the Committee of Public Accounts pursuant to the Orders of Reference of that Committee and/or the Comptroller and Auditor General (Amendment) Act, 1993;


Provided further that the Joint Committee shall refrain from inquiring into in public session, or publishing confidential information regarding, any such matter if so requested either by the body concerned or by the Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment; and


(viii)such other matters as may be jointly referred to it from time to time by both Houses of the Oireachtas, and shall report thereon to both Houses of the Oireachtas.


(b)The quorum of the Joint Committee shall be five, of whom at least one shall be a member of Dáil Éireann and one a member of Seanad Éireann.


(c)The Joint Committee shall have the powers defined in Standing Order 65(1) to (9) inclusive.


(2)The Chairman of the Joint Committee shall be a member of Dáil Éireann.’