Committee Reports::Report No. 02 - Provision of a national high speed broadband infrastructure::01 March, 2004::Report


Tithe an Oireachtais


An Comhchoiste um Chumarsáid, Muir agus Acmhainní Nádúrtha


An Dara Tuarascáil


Bonneagar ardluais leathanbhanda náisiúnta a sholáthar


[lena n-áirítear na costais ar úsáideoirí agus an cumas chun feidhmeanna Rialtais, Gnó agus Tráchtála a sholáthar tríd an mbonneagar ardluais leathanbhanda náisiúnta]


Imleabhar 2


Márta 2004


Houses of the Oireachtas


Joint Committee on Communications, Marine and Natural Resources


Second Report


Provision of a national high speed broadband infrastructure


[including the costs to users and the potential to deliver Government, Business and Commerce functions through the national high speed broadband infrastructure]


Volume 2


March 2004


α

CONTENTS


Volume 2


List of presentations


List of submissions and supplementary information


Section 1


Presentation 1 – Independent National Data Centre


Presentation 2 – South West Regional Authority


Presentation 3 – Leap Broadband


Presentation 4 – Telework & e-Training International


Presentation 5 – Ireland Offline


Presentation 6 – Southern Health Board


Presentation 7 – Health Systems Consultants


Presentation 8 – National Centre for Technology in Education


Presentation 9 – Atlantic Technology Alliance


Presentation 10 – Corevalue


Presentation 11 – Dublin City Development Board


Presentation 12 – Microsoft


Presentation 13 – Hewlett-Packard


Presentation 14 – Innovator


Presentation 15 – Disability Federation of Ireland


Presentation 16 – IAWS – AXIA


Presentation 17 – Dr. Sarah Skerratt


Presentation 18 – ComReg


Presentation 19 – Enterprise Ireland


Presentation 20 – IBEC - Telecommunications Industry Federation


Presentation 21 – Esat


Presentation 22 – Eircom


Presentation 23 – Cable providers – NTL


Presentation 24 – Cable providers – Chorus


Presentation 25 – Mobile Phone operators – Meteor, Vodafone, O2


Presentation 26 – ESB


Presentation 27 – MCI


Presentation 28 – Global Crossing


Presentation 29 – Telecommunications Users Group - IBEC


Presentation 30 – C2K, Northern Ireland


Presentation 31 – Professor William H. Melody, Economist


Presentation 32 – Forfás


Presentation 33 – Irish Broadband


Presentation 34 – Digiweb


Presentation 35 – Meteor


Section 2


Submission 1 – AXIA-IWAS


Submission 2 – Department of Communications, Marine & Natural Resources


Submission 3 – Information Society Policy Unit, Department of the Taoiseach


Submission 4 – Digiweb


Submission 5 – Eircom


Submission 6 – Grant County P.U.D., Washington


Submission 7 – IBM


Submission 8 – Mediasatellite Ireland


Submission 9 – Sky Pilot


Submission 10 – Department of Education and Science


Presentations by Date

Group/Perspective

Representitive(s)

Presentations Day One - 4th June, 2003

Independent National Data Centre

Mr. Tom Cahill

South West Regional Authority

Mr. John McAleer

Leap Broadband

Mr. Rory Ardagh

Telework & e-Training International

Ms. Nana Luke

Ireland Offline

Mr. David Long

Southern Health Board

Ms. Ursula O’Sullivan

Presentations Day Two - 5th June, 2003

Health Technology Consultant

Dr. Ricky Richardson

National Centre for Technology in Education

Mr. Jerome Morrissey

Atlantic Technology Alliance

Mr. Pat Shanahan

Corevalue (Broadband as an enabling technology to address existing and potential inequality)

Ms. Frances Buggy

Dublin City Development Board

Mr. Peter Finnegan

Microsoft

Mr. Joe Macri

Hewlett-Packard

Ms. Una Halligan

Presentations Day Three - 24th June, 2003

Gender perspective

Dr. Sadhbh McCarty
Ms. Elizabeth Nelligan

Disability perspective - Disability Federation of Ireland

Mr. Don Bailey
Mr. Brian Bolye

IAWS – AXIA

Mr. Bob Hansford
Mr. Cameron Milliken
Mr. Eugene Murray
Mr. Tom Tynan
Mr. John Tyrrell

Digital Divide – Regionalisation

Dr. Sarah Skerratt

ComReg

Commissioners:
John Doherty
Etain Doyle
Gary Healy
Isolde Goggin

Enterprise Ireland

Mr. Dan Flinter
Ms. Jennifer Condon

Presentations by Date

Group/Perspective

Representitive

Presentations Day Four - 1st July, 2003

Telecommunication providers - TIF, IBEC

Mr. Tom McCabe
Mr. David Healy
Mr. George Young

Esat

Mr. Peter Evans
Mr. David Taylor

Eircom

Mr. David McRedmond
Dr. Phil Nolan

Cable providers

Mr. Ed Brophy (NTL)
Mr. Mark Mohan (NTL)
Mr. Willie Fagan (Chorus)
Ms. Grainne McLaughlin (Chorus)

Mobile Phone operators

Mr. Andrew Kelly (Meteor)
Mr. Laurence McAuley (Vodafone)
Mr. Niall Norton (02)

Asset Owners, IE/ESB/BG

Mr. John McSweeney
Mr. John Wyse

Presentations Day Five - 8th July, 2003

MCI/Global Crossing

Mr. Ronan Lupton (MCI)
Mr. Eamonn Walsh (MCI)
Mr. Bernard Keogh (Global Crossing)

Telecommunications Users Group, IBEC

Mr. Brian Carolan
Ms. Siobhan Masterson
Mr. Paul McSweeney

C2K, Northern Ireland

Mr. Jimmy Stewart

Economist

Dr. William H. Melody

Forfas

Mr. Martin Cronin
Mr. Adrian Devitt

Irish Broadband/Digiweb

Mr. Ruairi Jennings
Mr. Jermey Nel
Mr. Colm Piercy

Meteor

Mr. Liam Hamilton
Mr. Andrew Kelly
Mr. Johnny McMahon

Submissions and Supplementary Information

AXIA-IWAS


- Supporting evidence for the Axia Ireland Broadband Proposition


Department of Communications, Marine & Natural Resources


- Cost of PCs in Schools, figures supplied by NCTE and Datanet


Information Society Policy Unit, Department of the Taoiseach


- Briefing by the Information Society Policy Unit


Digiweb


- Broadband Pilot Schemes


Eircom


- Update on Broadband & Investment


Grant County P.U.D., Washington


- Presentation to the delegation visiting Ephrata Washington State, U.S.A.


IBM


- The IBM in Ireland Submission to the National Plan for Women (2001-2005)


Mediasatellite Ireland


- B-DSL Technical Information


Sky Pilot


- Wireless Mesh Broadband Network Information


Department of Education and Science


- Briefing note for members on ICT in the Education Sector


PRESENTATION 1


Presentation by Independent National Data Centre


PRESENTATION 2


Presentation by South West Regional Authority


PRESENTATION 3


Presentation by Leap Broadband


PRESENTATION 4


Presentation by e-Training International


PRESENTATION 5


Presentation by Ireland Offline


PRESENTATION 6


Presentation by Southern Health Board


PRESENTATION 7


Presentation by Health Systems Consultants


PRESENTATION 8


Presentation by National Centre for Technology in Education


PRESENTATION 9


Presentation by Atlantic Technology Alliance


PRESENTATION 10


Presentation by Corevalue


PRESENTATION 11


Presentation by the Dublin City Development Board


PRESENTATION 12


Presentation by Microsoft


PRESENTATION 13


Presentation by Hewlett-Packard


PRESENTATION 14


Presentation by Innovator


PRESENTATION 15


Presentation by the Disability Federation of Ireland


PRESENTATION 16


Presentation by Iaws – Axia


PRESENTATION 17


Presentation by Dr. Sarah Skerratt


PRESENTATION 18


Presentation by ComReg


PRESENTATION 19


Presentation by Enterprise Ireland


PRESENTATION 20


Presentation by IBEC - Telecommunications Industry Federation


PRESENTATION 21


Presentation by Esat


PRESENTATION 22


Presentation by Eircom


PRESENTATION 23


Presentation by NTL


PRESENTATION 24


Presentation by Chorus


PRESENTATION 25


Presentation by Mobile Phone Operators


PRESENTATION 26


Presentation by ESB


PRESENTATION 27


Presentation by MCI


PRESENTATION 28


Presentation by Global Crossing


PRESENTATION 29


Presentation by Telecommunications Users Group - IBEC


PRESENTATION 30


Presentation by C2K, Northern Ireland


PRESENTATION 31


Presentation by Professor William H. Melody, Economist


PRESENTATION 32


Presentation by Forfás


PRESENTATION 33


Presentation by Irish Broadband


PRESENTATION 34


Presentation by Digiweb


PRESENTATION 35


Presentation by Meteor


Broadband for Ireland

HEARTWATCH and the Independent National Data Centre


Dept. of Communications, Marine and Natural Resources


-Mr. R. Lenihan


-Mr. F Marrinan


T. Cahill, Independent National Data Centre


Tom Cahill (marlow data services)

  • Relevant previous experience
  • Broadband & telecoms / internet


  • Music Control
  • 10 EU country offices / >80 monitoring sites


    WAN -Dublin Operations centre


    Emerging Internet (dial up) for customers


  • ETP
  • EDI, CRM and SCM in Nortel Networks


    Spar, An Post Intranet in PostGEM / IOL


    Eircom and Eircom.net (Transformation)


  • Interxion
  • Europe’s largest hosting & colocation company


    High-end broadband users


    Carrier neutrality (AT&T, Bell Canada (Teleglobe), BT (ESAT), C&W, Colt, Eircom, KPN Qwest (Ebone), Irish Broadband, Packet Xchange etc)


    IBM Premier partner, Oracle & SUN certified


HEARTWATCH

  • The initial implementation phase of a national strategy in primary care for the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease
  • Stakeholders
  • “Ireland’s Changing Heart” (Launch 27 March 2003)
  • The ‘NPC’ and the ‘INDC’

HEARTWATCH Targets

  • Reduce mortality by 15% among HEARTWATCH-registered patients
  • Improve level of morbidity in 25% of patients
  • March 2003 – March 2004: 480 GPs / 14,000 patients
  • Selection: 80% ‘computerised’
  • Plus -10% ‘to be computerised’ during the initial implementation phase
  • All data to be in electronic format
  • Confidentiality, privacy and security

INDC / ICT and the ‘Ideal’

  • National, centralised database
  • National, centralised applications…
  • …security
  • …backup
  • Obvious need for BROADBAND…..
  • Corresponding GP Practice infrastructure..

ICT – How it is….

  • The GP Practice and PC hardware / OS
  • Security & backup (the GP as ‘data controller’)
  • Practice Management Software (PMS)
  • IT support and maintenance
  • User skills
  • Internet….

INDC dependencies

  • PMS Vendors
  • Clinical dataset…
  • Internet
  • IT Support
  • Security & Backup
  • …hard decisions…
  • The ‘Interim Tool’ and its Upgrade
  • General IT Support…

INDC: Operating Environment


INDC - Service Providers

  • Hosting & Telecoms…
  • Security (physical & logical (Managed Firewall))


    Backup (“Datasafe”)


    Basic Support


    Basic Monitoring (ports & URLs)


    Performance Monitoring (not required)


    Internet (not much needed here)


  • Application…
  • Server (set up & development)


    Interim tool (set up, development & trouble-shooting)


    Support (server application)


    Web applications (not required)


  • Office LAN…
  • Support


INDC

  • Limitations to existing setup
  • Integration with existing PMS (these are GPs after all…)


    Changes in Clinical Data Set and PMS Vendor reaction


    Adjustments / upgrades to applications


    Trial studies / ad-hoc investigations


    Integration with other databases


  • Need for web-based applications….!

Broadband & GP Practices

  • Implications of Broadband
  • ‘Always on’… (must have security, backup)


    (Possible ‘dot.net’ implications…)


    Firewall and router (€200 – 700)


    User skills


    H/w and OS investments…


PMS Vendors

  • Implications of Broadband / web-based apps
  • Minimum standard ‘Integrated PMS’ with data import functionality


    ‘Seamless’ interface with web-based applications


    Probable long-term transition to ASP model, leaving database stuff to INDC-like operations


INDC -Implications

Hosting & Telecoms…


Security (physical & logical (Managed Firewall))


Backup (“Datasafe”)


Basic Support


Basic Monitoring (ports & URLs)


Performance Monitoring (applications & database)


Internet (more of this!)


  • Application…
  • Server (set up & development)


    Interim tool (set up, development & trouble-shooting)


    Support (server application)


    Web applications


  • Office LAN…
  • Support


INDC – web-based App


Possible future scenarios

  • 1 – It (data) all goes central…(Broadband)
  • 2 – It all stays local…(low bandwidth)
  • The increasing demand for ‘Standard Applications’ will ensure either 1 or 2 happens. A combination of 1 and 2 is not sustainable in the longer term

Questions


Presentation to the Oireachtas Joint Committee on Communications, Marine and Natural Resources


June 4th, 2003


John McAleer


Director


South West Regional Authority


Information and Communications Technologies


Potential benefits include:


» Death of distance


» Overcome peripherality


» New methods of working


» Access to markets


Ireland’s Knowledge based economy

Increasingly Ireland’s economic output is based on knowledge rather than raw materials


Therefore

Access to ICTS is increasingly important to the sustainability of all areas of the State


Broadband dependency

  • While economic opportunity greatly depends on Broadband
  • market forces suggest that the infrastructure will only be provided in areas where the customer base is large
  • Therefore the Information Society is more likely an agent of economic concentration rather than dispersal


Regional Authority Strategic Objective

  • To promote the economic sustainability of all areas of the region
  • To provide technology centers in Towns such as Bantry, Cahirsiveen, Listowel Newmarket etc.
  • To facilitate equality of access for all citizens to e-Government, distant education, teleworking .

All of these objectives are challenged by lack of bandwidth


Throughout Europe

  • Now very clear that areas are becoming more marginalised due to lack ofbandwidth-and not just peripheral or remote areas.
  • No good business case for the Telecom providers to service small populations
  • Ducting alone costs more than €140.00 per linear metre
  • New approaches required

The Case for Satellite Broadband


European Space Agency

  • South West Regional Authority co-funded by the European Space Agency to:
  • Trial
  • Evaluate and
  • Disseminate throughout Europe

The use of Satellite technology to deliver broadband to regions throughout Europe


South West Broadband project

  • Already clearly demonstrates the power of satellite to service towns
  • Economic viability of satellite enhanced bylinking to Wireless LANs
  • Europe’s most westerly Satellite/ Wireless LAN being launched Friday 6th June at Cahirsiveen – All welcome!

Conclusions and recommendation

  • Ireland should consider contracting alarge bandwidth sector on one or moreof the available satellite operators
  • 2 distinct advantages:
    Bandwidth costs would be significantly lowered

and


As the systems are fully scalable, priority bandwidth could be ascribed to particular users when required.


Cost effectiveness

  • Satellite costs approx. €7,000 per town
  • Immediate rollout
  • No excavations etc
  • Viability greatly enhanced by linking wireless Local Area Networks
  • Avoid obsolescence issues

Taking the matter forward

  • Would suggest and appreciate meeting of South West Regional Authority and our Space Sector partners with Joint Committee’s Consultants to discuss detailed aspects of our recommendation.

Go raibh maith agaibh


John McAleer


Director


South West Regional Authority


jmcaleer@swra.ie


Project Website – www.swra.ie/broadband.



leap broadband

Ireland’s Number 1 for Business Broadband


Rory Ardagh


Introducing Leap Broadband

Leap Broadband is the most successful ‘new entrant’ Broadband operator in Ireland with a, large, growing and Broadband enabled customer base


Leap Broadband is a specialist Broadband Internet Provider, and aims to be Ireland’s premier provider of flat rate, always-on Internet access and data services to the business community


Leap Broadband is Dublin based, and Irish owned. Founded by brothers Rory & Charlie Ardagh and Bart Bonsall to develop a network which will provide faster access to the Internet at more affordable prices than previously available on the Irish market.


Applications driving broadband demand


internet access today Broadband Technology Comparison


Cable Modems Omitted:


  • No cable “unbundled loop” available
  • Little access to business customers
  • Targeted at residential & casual users

Fiber


  • Largest Customers
  • Point density
  • High density urban, Office & Industrial Parks

Point to Point Radio


  • Largest customers
  • Point density
  • All areas (different freq)

FWA 1


  • High-density traffic
  • Urban areas

FWA 2


  • Medium-density traffic
  • Urban / suburban areas

DSL


  • Must have unbundled loop
  • Bandwidth limited
  • Urban / suburban areas
  • Residential, SOHO, SME

Broadband Satellite


  • Low-density traffic
  • Suburban / rural areas

FAST -the Leap Broadband Advantage

Flat rate - our highly competitive pricing enables businesses to spend as much time online as they wish without having to consider per minute call charges


Always-on connections to the Internet - no dialing in to check, send or receive emails or browse the Web


Scalable – Leap Broadband is a flexible service giving you bandwidth on demand so your Internet requirements grow with your business


Timely - the business critical benefits of Leap Broadband Internet access and data services can be installed within days



Some Leap Broadband Customers


3 Main Issues Facing Leap

“All consumers … deserve a new spectrum policy paradigm that is rooted in modern-day technologies and markets. We are living in a world where demand for spectrum is driven by an explosion of wireless technology and the ever-increasing popularity of wireless services. Nevertheless, we are still living under a spectrum ’management’ regime that is 90 years old. It needs a hard look, and in my opinion, a new direction.”


Chairman Michael K. Powell, Federal Communications Commission, October 30, 2002.


  • Wireless Legislation in Ireland MUST be updated urgently.

    – Currently Outmoded, more outdated, than the US and ‘Showing it’s 1920s Vintage’


    – Technological Advance has been stymied consistently because of this:


    • Delayed 3G roll-out because of battle between ODTR and Department of Finance over fees
    • Inflexibility of current legislation to meet modern technological advances – Where is DTV? Can’t we use that spectrum for Wireless Broadband?
    • Regulatory uncertainty as to COMREG’s ‘effective enforcement’ ability to make available the ‘idle/stranded’ Chorus/Eircom 3.5GHz spectrum

    Leap needs to be able to grow it’s business in a modern, progressive and competition friendly regulatory environment


3 Main Issues Facing Leap

  • State Assets ought be made available for use by Leap, and others, to provide Broadband to towns around the country:


    CIE has a great fiber infrastructure that, though incomplete, could be made available ‘as is’ to reach tens of towns around the country.


    ESB, also in state ownership, should be forced to make available a usable product at a reasonable price.


    Global Crossing connectivty should be provided all around the country instead of in just two Dublin industrial estates.


  • Leap wants to expand and provide it’s services outside of Dublin – however getting from Dublin to Strokestown still remains more expensive than getting from Dublin to Stockholm.

3 Main Issues Facing Leap

  • “Telecommunications is one area where the benefits of deregulation have still to come through to consumers through real competition”,

    Dr. John Fingleton, Chairman of the Competition Authority, Irish Times, May 27 2003.


  • Leap supports Dr. Fingletons assertion and would like to ask the Committee to seek that the Competition Authority undertake an independent evaluation of the state of competition within the Irish telecoms industry, to benchmark the effectiveness of the ODTR/Comreg to date, and to recommend any legislative changes necessary to achieve effective competition.

    Leap needs to be able to grow it’s business in a modern, progressive and competition friendly regulatory environment


leap broadband

Ireland’s Number 1 for Business Broadband


Rory Ardagh


E-Training International

Presentation


to the


ICT Sub-Committee


of the


Joint Committee on Communications, Marine and Natural Resources


Nana Luke


Director, E-Training International


Chairperson, Telework Ireland


Overview

  • Who we are
  • What we do
  • How we do it
  • The benefits of eWork
  • Our need for broadband
  • Scariff Community Broadband Project
  • The need for broadband
  • International comparisons
  • Action urgently required
  • … especially in rural areas

The question is no longer


   Why do we need broadband?


The question is: How quickly can we roll it out?


Fast -tracking WANs for rural areas is the way forward.


Broadband is essential infrastructure - this is not a regional or market issue.


Who we are

  • E-Training International is a business name of Bealtaine Ltd. since 2000.
  • E-Training International is managed by 2 directors of Bealtaine Ltd:
  • Martina Minogue


    Nana Luke


  • Bealtaine Ltd (est. 1994) also incorporates:
  • East Clare Telecottage (est. 1991)


    Taylor Lightfoot Transport Consultants (est. 1990)


Location -Rural:


Office premises in Main Street, Scariff, Co. Clare and home offices


Rural Market Town in East Clare, 25 miles Limerick, 22 miles Ennis.


Population 900, including hinterland 1,500


Comms: ISDN & PSTN


Chances of getting broadband through market forces – not good!


What we do

  • Translations
  • OASIS, BASIS, REACH


    Roche, IBM, Trumpf


  • Research
  • Dept. of Justice, Equality and Law Reform, NDP Gender Equality Unit


    Rural Resource Development (Clare LEADER) - Evaluation of IT resources in Co. Clare


  • IT and Softskills training
  • Clare LES


    FÁS Shannon


  • Training and e-learning content development
  • FÁS Curriculum Development Unit


    Intuition Publishing


    Primelearning.com


  • Design & Print
  • eWork consultancy
  • EU Projects
  • 4th and 5th FP


    Leonardo da Vinci


    ADAPT


    eContent


How we do it

  • Internet and email!
  • Databases of skilled eWorkers
  • Solid expertise in sourcing and management of eTeams
  • Growing list of major reference clients
  • Core employees, eWorkers as needed on contract basis
  • Network of 500+ translators
  • All World Languages


    Many specialist areas of expertise


  • Database of 150 skilled eWorkers
  • instructional design


    technical writing


    graphic design


    webdesign


    programming


    administration


    surveys & data entry


Benefits of eWork Model

Personal benefits:


Work where you live


Very short commute


Business benefits:


Flexibility: Core staff in small premises, project based eTeams work from home offices


No skills shortages!


Knowledge Based Business


  • no heavy machinery
  • no factory buildings
  • low environmental impact
  • relatively easy to implement

ideal for more rural areas


Benefits to community & for regional development


  • Local access to:
  • ICT equipment


    training


    services


  • Employment generation
  • Easier participation in labour force
  • Reduced commuting to larger centres
  • Catalyst for ICT developments in area
  • More balanced overall development

Our need for broadband

Knowledge based business -
could not exist without Internet and email


Needs:


Always online


Affordable Flat Fee Access


High speed connectivity


  • fast receiving and sending of files
  • fast Internet research
  • online training
  • Video conferencing
  • Collaborative working

Has to survive on:


Frequent dial-up via ISDN


Expensive metered access


Slow connection speeds


  • long delays to download-send files
  • slow and hence frustrating Internet research
  • forget bandwidth intensive applications!

Scariff Community Broadband Project

Community Broadband Project


Source Broadband Access to the Internet


Make available to Local Community via WAN


Leverage high speed Internet Access & even higher speed Local Area Network for:


  • Education
  • Business
  • Community Network
  • eHealth

Submitted to:


Dept of Communications, Marine & Natural Resources


Dept of Community, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs (CLÁR)


Interested Participants:


Scariff National School


Scariff Community College


Scariff Medical Centre


Derg Credit Union


Bank of Ireland


Scariff Library


Local Businesses


Local Sports Clubs


Local Development Groups


Clare County Council


Shannon Development


CLÁR Area:


Flagmount National School


Killanena National School


Home based eWorkers


The need for broadband

  • Need level playing field – nationally & internationally:
  • Equal access for schools & children at home


    Business competitiveness Cost & speed of broadband access


  • New Applications and Uses
  • New Business opportunities!


    Access global Markets from anywhere! - If we don’t, others will!


  • Bridge digital divide
  • Much cheaper, faster, more interesting Internet Access.


    Rural location must not be a barrier!


  • Unlock potential for eWorking!
  • 33% poductivity gains on top of 20% for dial-up eworkers!


    Balanced regional development


Evaluation of IT resources in Co. Clare


  • 70% of schools connected to Internet using analogue telephone lines!
  • 70% of communities have NO local public access to the internet

International Comparisons


  • Irish DSL penetration 1%
  • 94% of all businesses in Denmark have DSL!
  • 26% of home internet users in Belgium have DSL!

By 2008:


  • 28% of all EU households will have broadband
  • Belgium – 42%
  • Ireland – 14%
  • Greece – 10%
  • Northern Ireland
  • Available to 47.4% of homes


    55.9 % of schools covered


    50.6% of Libraries covered


    Pilots for rural access in progress


  • www.connectedcommunities.co.uk (Bringing Broadband to the Western Isles)
  • Spain – Asturias – May 2003 Regional Government launches 74 telecentres in small rural towns. All broadband enabled.
  • www.workingwithyou.co.uk
    BT’s site to stimulate broadband uptake – transparency, trigger levels

Urgent Action required!

  • The question is no longer
  • Why do we need broadband?


  • The question is
  • How quickly can we roll it out?


  • We are moving way too slowly – 30 months behind competitor countries (Forfas)
  • Broadband (DSL, WAN, FTTH, cable) is rapidly becoming global standard

Essential in order to stay competitive!


  • World Economic Forum Competitiveness Report 2002:
  • It is now easier to get broadband in Botswana and Romania than in Ireland! (52nd out of 81 countries)


  • IMD World Competitiveness Yearbook 2003 - out of 29 smaller countries, Ireland scores last in:
  • Suitable Internet Access


    Distribution of Infrastructure


    Maintenance of Infrastructure not adequately planned or funded (28th)


..especially in rural areas

  • Market Forces may never be enough.
  • Major Investment is needed NOW!
  • Government needs to take responsibility for this vital infrastructure
  • Industry has been voicing concerns for years – government needs to listen NOW!
  • Fast Track and fund Wireless Area Network Projects
  • Fast Track MANs (initial call was in October 2001…)
  • Promote and fund innovative approaches (e.g BT NI ADSL Exchange Activate – Community Broadband)
  • Level Playing field in Ireland
  • – broadband access should not be dependent on location /regional activities


  • Broadband Access to all schools – catalyst for community access?

Useful links

eWorking and Teleworking


  • www.telework.ie
  • www.ework.ie
  • www.familyfriendly.ie
  • www.ivc.ca (Canadian Teleworking Association)
  • www.tca.org (UK Teleworking Association)

Alternative Irish Broadband Coverage


www.eircomtribunal.com


  • www.irelandoffline.org
  • www.irishwan.org

International


  • www.connectedcommunities. co.uk (Bringing Broadband to the Western Isles)
  • www.actnowcornwall.co.uk
  • EU Objective One, BT, SW Regional Development Agency, Enterprise Agencies, Cornwall College


  • www.workingwithyou.co.uk
  • BT’s site to stimulate broadband uptake – transparency, trigger levels


General Internet


  • http://cyberatlas.internet.com
  • Has taken over Nua. Global Internet Stats.


  • www.electricnews.net

Irish & International Tech News


mail: chairman@IrelandOffline.org


www: www.IrelandOffline.org



Broadband - The Next Steps for Ireland


Ireland Offline


4th June 2003


Contents

1 Introduction

1.1 About IrelandOffline

1.2 The term “broadband”

2 Market overview

2.1 International views

2.2 The demand for broadband

2.3 Current Irish broadband market

2.3.1 Broadband Penetration

2.3.2 Growth in broadband

2.3.3 Explanation of Ireland’s poor broadband performance

2.4 Historical background

2.5 Recent developments

3 Current attempts to solve the problem.

3.1 Metropolitan area networks

3.2 Government-funded wireless projects

4 What needs to be done.

4.1 Looking at alternatives

4.2 Conclusion: prioritise wireless

5 Recommendations.

5.1 Support and fund local initatives

5.2 Increase availability of affordable backhaul

5.3 Raise public awareness of alternative technologies

References

1 Introduction

1.1 About Ireland Offline

Ireland Offline was formed on 13 May 2001 in response to the closure of an off-peak flat rate ISP service earlier that year. Since then it has evolved into a campaign group highlighting deficits in flat rate dial-up Internet access and broadband. Ireland Offline has been successful in lobbying for flat rate and such services are due to be introduced towards the end of June, 2003. Ireland Offline is an independent organisation and has no affiliations with any commercial organisations.


In this document we make a simple argument. Ireland is behind in the development of broadband technologies due to the lack of appropriate supply (not demand). This lack of supply is due to lack of competition particularly at the last mile infrastructure level. To solve the problem, competition in the form of alternative last mile infrastructure needs to be introduced.


1.2 The term “broadband”.

In recent years, the term “broadband” as it is commonly used internationally has come to mean the sort of high speed Internet access typically available through cable modems and DSL (digital subscriber lines) at a price affordable by homes and small businesses. Speeds offered by these means are usually a multiple (ten to fifty times) of that offered by analogue modems over telephone lines. The common usage usually does not include corporate digital communications via, for example, leased lines.


In Ireland, “broadband” sometimes refers to the regional fibre infrastructure, however in this document, the term will refer to those services as defined by the common international usage of the term as outlined above.


In addition we would not class wireless LAN “hotspots” as broadband since these do not provide residential or small business access. Hotspots are an example of what can be achieved for a couple of hundred euros once broadband is available at a particular location. They are not a solution to the problem of providing broadband.


2 Market overview

2.1 International views

A number of International reports have highlighted Ireland’s poor performance in introducing broadband.


In October 2001, the OECD [OECD 2001] ranked Ireland 27th out of 30 OECD countries in the development of broadband access.


In February 2003, the World Economic Forum placed Ireland 51st behind Namibia, Peru, Nicaragua, Botswana, Dominican Republic, Mexico, Guatemala, Brazil and Romania [WEF 2002]. In fact Ireland is lower than half way down on a list of 82 countries that includes some of the poorest in the world.


In May, 2003, the Swiss Business School, IMD, ranked Ireland last of 29 small economies for “Suitable Internet Access (availability, speed, cost)” in their World Competitiveness Index.[IMD 2003]


2.2 The demand for broadband.

In 2002, ComReg commissioned a report from the market research company, MRBI, [MRBI 2002] to find out the level of demand for broadband. Without the issue of price mentioned, they found that 46% of respondents (sample of adult population) were likely (32% fairly likely and 14% very likely) to get broadband if it were offered. They also found a large degree of price-sensitivity in the demand for broadband. There was approximately five times the demand at EUR 30 than at EUR 60 with negligible demand at EUR 70 or above. At the time of the survey, the only broadband that was available to most people was DSL in the region of EUR 100 and above.


In the Irish market, there is significant demand once the price approaches European averages in the region of EUR 30 to EUR 40. If this demand was met, Ireland would lead Europe in broadband take up.


2.3 Current Irish broadband market

2.3.1 Broadband Penetration (% of population) [ECTA 2003].

Country

Broadband Lines

Population

Broadband Penetration

Belgium

955,586

10,274,595

9.30%

Denmark

460,055

5,368,854

8.57%

Netherlands

1,358,384

16,067,754

8.45%

Sweden

602,863

8,876,744

6.79%

Austria

505,590

8,169,929

6.19%

Finland

273,000

5,183,545

5.27%

Germany

3,760,000

83,251,851

4.52%

Spain

1,525,440

40,077,100

3.81%

France

2,078,449

59,765,983

3.48%

Portugal

310,942

10,084,245

3.08%

UK

1,773,180

59,778,002

2.97%

Italy

1,156,000

57,715,625

2.00%

Luxembourg

6,892

448,569

1.54%

Ireland

7,287

3,883,159

0.19%

Greece

0

10,645,343

0.00%

The above table shows that Ireland is currently second from the bottom in a table of EU countries for broadband per head of population. Belgium has over 48 times the broadband penetration of Ireland.


2.3.2 Growth in broadband (per 1000 population)[ECTA 2002] (from end of June 2002 to end of March 2003).

Country

New Services since June ‘02

Growth (per 100 pop)

Netherlands

813,108

51

Denmark

220,780

41

Belgium

312,586

30

Finland

131,500

25

France

1,216,000

20

Spain

810,050

20

Austria

154,110

19

UK

1,063,580

18

Germany

1,160,000

14

Sweden

108,905

12

Italy

606,500

11

Luxembourg

4,192

9

Portugal

41,623

4

Ireland

4,790

1

Greece

0

0

This table shows that not only is Ireland second from the bottom for broadband penetration, but when compared with the figures for end of June 2002, Ireland is also growing its broadband connections much more slowly than other countries. Ireland continues to fall farther and farther behind at an alarming rate despite modest developments.


2.3.3 Explanation of Ireland’s poor broadband performance:- Lack of infrastructure competition.

The low broadband penetration and low growth in that penetration can be explained easily. Apart from cable modem Internet (covering at most 40,000 homes in Ireland) the vast majority of consumers in the country either had no access to broadband or, where available, broadband based on telephone lines and services was provided by the incumbent telephone company and resellers. Until recently, DSL provided by both Eircom or one of its competitors operating under LLU (Local Loop Unbundling) regulations, was only available in limited areas and the entry-level services were priced at over EUR 100, well above the international norm (EUR 30 -50) and outside the range considered affordable by residential customers. Also, the number of exchanges that were enabled to provide DSL was low and the line failure rate appeared to be high with one user group reporting an 80% failure rate. We believe that this was due to poor quality of lines and “pair gain” systems (devices which allow two virtual lines to operate over a single copper pair).


The reason for the high price is a lack of competition.


2.4 Historical background.

In other countries, cable TV companies have led the way in providing residential broadband. Broadband Internet via DSL was developed initially in the US in the mid- 90s as a means of combating competition from cable companies undermining revenue from dial-up Internet. It is unlikely it would have been offered otherwise.


Ireland has very high cable TV penetration, however very little of this is of a standard which supports two-way communication. Historically, cable TV became popular in the late ’60s and early ’70s during a time when only one Irish terrestrial TV channel was available and the public was willing to pay for more choice. What was known as “communal aerials” were erected so that a large central antenna could be used to receive British terrestrial channels. The signal was then relayed to homes via coaxial cable. These local systems were subsequently amalgamated into larger cable TV companies. Because the original appeal of cable TV in Ireland was to provide an access to a few additional channels, the capacity of the systems remained low.


In other countries where multiple terrestrial channels were already available, cable TV developed along different lines. Consumers already had a choice and therefore the cable TV providers had to provide a multitude of extra specialist channels like film and sport in order to make the package attractive. In addition, because the cable networks were developed later, the cable companies were not burdened with legacy infrastructure. Belgium, for example, has the highest broadband take up in Europe and also has very significant competition from cable TV with 41% [ECTA 2003] opting for cable modem Internet access.


2.5 Recent developments

From a high of EUR 107 for basic broadband, the price has come down to between EUR 50 and EUR 56. This has been made possible by the addition of a new bitstream1 service at EUR 27. While still expensive by European standards (norm: EUR 30 to EUR 40), we expect take up to increase somewhat. Unfortunately, prices are unlikely to come down further due to the still high (by European standards) bitstream wholesale rate of EUR 27. Excluding Ireland, bitstream ranges from EUR 13.3 in Belgium to EUR 25.4 in Austria [Infosoc 2001], making Ireland’s bitstream DSL the most expensive in Europe.


We believe that this reduction is largely due to the immanent introduction of flat rate Internet packages at the end of June 2003 as predicted in the Analysis Consulting report for Forfás [Forfás 2002].


There are plans for 150 exchanges to be enabled by September 2004 but no plans for the remaining 950 exchanges. These exchanges are outside large urban areas.


In addition, there has been an increase in competition from wireless operators in the Dublin area. Two companies now operate from Three Rock Mountain offering residential broadband in the EUR 50 region. One of them is trialing a EUR 30 service in the Tallaght area of Dublin. Also, the companies Net1 and Digiweb have begun offering wireless services in Louth, and Amocom in Cork.


Apart from these welcome exceptions we remain in the situation where one company controls most of of the market - several others reselling aspects of this. The illusion of competition is maintained by the requirement of this company to provide appropriate wholesale services for each of its retail services. Although this allows competitor companies to make money, the actual services provided depend on innovation by the incumbent telephone company.


ComReg’s MRBI demand survey shows that calling for demand-side initiatives is a smokescreen for inaction and high cost. Ireland has as much demand for broadband as other countries (see 2.2, The Demand for Broadband).


3 Current attempts to solve the problem.

3.1 Metropolitan area networks.

This solves the problem at a local but not last-mile level, however it will be essential for providing cheap backhaul for wireless broadband operators. Unfortunately, current plans seem to be slipping. The original plan outlined on 7 March 2002 was that 123 towns with populations over 1,500 would be completed. 67 towns would be provided with fibre rings by the end of 2003. However more recent announcements seem to indicate that only 19 of them will be completed by this year. This casts doubt whether the full project will be completed in five years.


3.2 Government-funded wireless projects.

Company

Amount (Euros)

Area Covered (examples)

Digiweb

66,446

Several towns in Louth.

Amocom

11,757

Cork City & Mahon area

Rococo/Trinity College

23,500

Trinity College Hotspots

O2, Esat BT

111,268

Hotspots in Hotels, Harbours, etc.

In addition to this, through EU funding, the BMW assembly has provided grants totaling EUR 250,000 for wireless projects providing broadband in Ballinlough Co. Roscommon & Ballyhaunis Co. Mayo, Strokestown, Co. Roscommon and Virginia, Co. Cavan.


4 What needs to be done.

Taking into account the lack of last mile competition and consequent lack of innovation, the solution will require developing alternative last mile solutions.


4.1 Looking at alternatives:

1. Wireless: no ultimate bandwidth limitation. No single ownership of the broadcast medium - individual operators hold or share spectrum allocations. Plenty of empty spectrum for future development. Downside - line of sight problems to some locations with particular technologies and frequencies.


2. Upgrading the cable system - very expensive - still have bandwidth limitations. Ownership of infrastructure limited to one company.


3. Powerline broadband. More bandwidth possible. Will ultimately hit limitations based on capacity of signal over copper. Another case of one company owning the last mile infrastructure hampering innovation.


4. FTTH (Fibre optic To The Home) - no upper limit to bandwidth. Very expensive. Ownership in the hands of one entity - there would have to be controls over coverage and pricing -vendor neutral wholesale.


4.2 Conclusion: prioritise wireless.

In our opinion, it is no longer time for trials. Immediate action is necessary and a proven alternative last mile technology exists.


If one of these solutions were to be pursued exclusively, we believe it should be wireless because it provides the most scope for competition and innovation. Not only between wireless providers and ’wired’ providers but also between wireless providers themselves. Wireless is not one single technology (like broadband over powerlines), but a family of technologies.


Wireless is currently the focus of major technological innovation for the delivery of broadband over the last mile in terms of range, bandwidth and cost. If the Government was to commit itself to the rollout of a nationwide competing wireless infrastructure, we stand to position ourselves to benefit directly from this innovation. We believe that by pursuing this strategy, Ireland would become not only the equal, but better than its peers for availability, cost and speed of Internet access.


This is because, with a national wireless infrastructure in place, the continued technological innovation in wireless will have an immediate impact on innovation in services and, as a consequence, the other providers of broadband have to continually innovate to compete, something which will not happen in countries where cable is the competing broadband medium.


5 Recommendations.

5.1 Support and fund local initiatives.

Up to a fifth of households in Ireland that are not connected to a public water supply are served by Group Water Schemes, with subsidies provided for infrastructure and training. In a similar manner, local co-operatives should be supported for the provision of local connectivity needs, DublinWan being an example of such a community group.


As well as funding for community initiatives, there should be increased funding for commercial initiatives particularly outside of large conurbations. In this respect, Government funding for Digiweb and Amocom is to be praised and encouraged. However, significantly more in this regard needs to be done.


5.2 Increase availability of affordable backhaul.

Facilitate affordable, simple connection to backhaul: The Government’s Metropolitan Area Network should be accelerated to reach its original target of 123 towns by 2007. ESB should be instructed to increase the number of POPs (points of presence) for connecting to backhaul and also sell capacity in smaller chunks. Currently the minimum available is 155 mbits/second, whereas chunks of 2mbits/second are more reasonable for local service providers and communities.


5.3 Raise public awareness of alternative technologies

A public awareness campaign highlighting alternative platforms for broadband delivery. This will help combat any consumer ’inertia’ that may be present with regard to switching from established platforms. Consumers should be made aware that DSL and cable modems aren’t the only possible means of getting broadband. Although there are no known health issues with wireless broadband, consumers may be wary of adopting such technologies.


References

[ECTA 2003] ECTA April 2003 (cable + DSL figures).


http://www.ectaportal.com/ectauploads/dsl_apr03.html


[CIA 2002] CIA World Factbook http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/


[ECTA 2002] ECTA June 2003 (cable + DSL figures)


http://www.ectaportal.com/regulatory/dsl_jun02.xlshttp://www.ectaportal.com/r egulatory/dsl_jun02.xls


[Infosoc 2001] EU Information Society, 8th Implementation Report.


http:


//europa.eu.int/information_society/topics/telecoms/implementation/annual_report/8threport/finalreport/com2002_0695en01.pdf


[Forfás 2002]Forfás: Broadband Investment in Ireland. Review of Progress and Key Policy Requirements.


http://www.forfas.ie/publications/ bband02.htm


[OECD 2001]OECD - The Development of Broadband Access in OECD Countries, October 2001.


http://www.oecd.org/pdf/M00020000/M00020255.pdf


[IMD 2003] IMD - World Competitiveness Index.


http://www02.imd.ch/wcy/countrylist/


[WEF 2002] World Economic Forum - Global Information Technology
Report 2002-2003.


[MRBI 2002] Consumer Demand for Broadband in Ireland - Findings of Survey Ian McShane, Managing Director, MRBI.


http://www.comreg.ie/_fileupload/publications/IanMcShane.pdf



mHealth


If you don’t know where you are going…. any road will get you there? Even though there are a lot of possibilities it’s still important to set a direction.


eGovernment is providing direction and opportunities so we need to introduce new technologies with business / service models in a way that maximises potential.



mHealth


Government + Health


eGovernment

eHealth

  • Access to Services and Information
  • Citizens and their right to information
  • Backend re-organising systems and services to provide better access
  • Using technology to improve Healthcare delivery e.g.
  • Telemedicine, Lab Results to GPs, Outreach Clinics, Appointment Booking
  • Electronic Patient Record


……There is structure in Healthcare

Foundation Technologies


  • Networks/Connectivity/CDRs/
  • Data Integration
  • Internet/Intranet/Extranet
  • Integrated Medical Devices
  • Imaging
  • Interactive Computer Telephony Integration

Advanced Technologies


  • Consumer/Patient Health Systems
  • Electronic Commerce
  • Relationship Management Systems
  • Workflow Technologies
  • Research Systems
  • Expert Logic
  • Wireless




  • Internet technologies have broadened access to data and information in a way that shatters previous models
  • Cost control


    Information access


    Clinicians, Healthcare Professionals


    Patients, Citizens


1.We need to understand that large advances are coming within 3-5 years, and current investments may require replacement / upgrading


2.Develop strong healthcare professionals education programme today to prepare for the tools that will be available in the near-and mid-term


A short overview of the SHB experiences addressing the challenges and opportunities of eGovernment


Health eSHB

Environment


  • 47,000 sq miles
  • 564k population base
  • 16,000 Staff, 6,000 field based
  • 250 Locations
  • Personal Computers – 3,800 Laptop Computers - 500
  • Mobile Phones – 1,200
  • Extensive WAN and Local Area Networks


10 Goals


1. Integration of patient based services


2. New ways of delivering services and information


3. Manage information as an asset


4. Manage creation of knowledge


5. Optomise use of resources


6. Create an effective organisation


7. Achieve an Electronic Health Record [EHR]


8. eEnable Clinical Systems


9. eEnable Administrative Systems


10. Develop an enabling Technology Architecture


What do we mean by that?


  • Providing Citizen Access
  • Listening Days, eGovt Initiatives,


  • Information & Knowledge Management
  • Medical Protocols, Research, Best Practice


  • Development of Single Patient Record
  • Advanced Communications
  • Telemedicine


Practical Examples


  • eProcurement
  • eServices
  • Births, Death & Marriages


    Environmental Health, Bridges Dental


  • Word Based Content Management System
  • Board-wide VPN [Virtual Private Network]
  • Integrated patient records
  • Community, Mobile Computing


  • Blended eTraining / eLearning

Interactive Hospital School



MOBILE … COMMUNITY PIMs



Integrated EHR


Where are we going now?


  • New National Health Strategy
    • including National Health Information Strategy
  • Continue to implement Health eSHB
  • Continue to work with eGovt. initatives
    • HeBE, eBroker, Benchmarks, EU Indicators, Govt. VPN, develop new means of delivery e.g. Digital TV, Health Portal, GP Access, etc….

E’…. is not just about computers and systems.


It is about people and processes and most importantly it is about thinking differently….


eSHB….. 2001


Opportunity and Challenge

Contact Details:- Ursula O’Sullivan


eMail:- osullivanu@shb.ie


Web:- www.shb.ie


Phone:- 021-4922990


eHealth eEurope eVolution


Dr Ricky J Richardson


BSc MBBS MRCP(UK) FRCP FRCPCH DCH DTM…H


Chairman - UK eHealth Association


Chairman – Pan European eHealth Working Group Pan European eHealth Working Group


European Health Telematics Association - EHTEL


Clinical Director – HealthSystems Consultants Ltd


Consultant Paediatrician


Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London


The Portland Hospital for Women & Children, London


The Speech, Language and Hearing Centre, London


Health is far too important a subject to be left in the hands of the medical professionals !!!!


Dr Halfdan Mahler - DG Emeritus - WHO


after Oscar Wilde



Who will be the primary care physician of the future?


The ePatient !


What is eHealth?



eHealth


  • Clinical Applications
  • TeleConsultations (previously Telemedicine)


    Clinical Decision Making Support Software


    Vital Signs Monitoring Services


    TeleHomeCare


  • eDissemination of – personalised - Healthcare Professional Continuing Education
  • Public Health education … Information
  • LifeTime Health Records - longitudinal healthcare event recording - ePrevention
  • eHealth Services
  • - National ePrescribing Services


    - eNursing




The Paradigm Shift

The Seven Drivers Forcing Change


  • Obligatory search for cost containment
  • Changing demographics
  • Peripheralisation of health care delivery
  • Changing disease patterns
  • Impact of information technology including IT support for clinical decisions - Telemedicine … eHealth
  • More informed and expectant patients C-Health
  • The well-being factor – responsibility shift into patients hands - The Wellness Paradigm




The Impact of Globalisation on Healthcare delivery

Healthcare Services move into the Retail Environment Shopping Mall medicine


C-health: - Health-on-line Websites


District General and Regional Hospitals become obsolete as a concept


Emergence of Epicenters of Medical Excellence




The Paradigm Shift The Impact

Healthcare Professionals


  • Healthcare practices - changing roles changing roles
  • Healthcare training
  • Financial remuneration/rewards
  • Healthcare vocation

Patients


  • Partners in the healthcare process

The Paradigm Shift Who will be the Primary Care Team of the Future?

The Informed ePatient


  • Family and friends
  • Patient Web Communities
  • Pharmacists
  • Medical Auxiliaries / Community Nurses
  • A “Super” Primary Care Physician?

Will the family doctor become “The Wellness Guardian-Caretaker”?




Telemedicine … eHealth The story so far

  • Interactive Video Conferencing - 1980
  • Tele-Radiology, USA - 1990
  • International Telemedicine - 1994
  • The Telemedicine Blueprint, Malaysia - 1997
  • Telemedicine “Comes of Age” - 1998 -TeleHealth? TeleCare? Citizen-Health?
  • Telemedicine becomes “Medicine” - 1999
  • eHealth : The Road Ahead 2003

European Commission

Mission Statement


To make medical services - wheresoever sourced - ubiquitously available across Europe


  • To promote eHealth & Telemedicine across Europe at all levels
  • To identify barriers to eHealth & Telemedicine and use all means to overcome them
  • To identify and promote technologies & solutions to achieve this aim


European Commission

Issues in Europe


Ageing Population


Candidate Countries – different levels of care


Present Healthcare Models --- Unsustainable


Solutions


Drive point of care outwards eHealth everywhere


Migration of


Patients


Healthcare Professionals



European Health Telematics Association

Mission


  • To develop a Pan European Strategy for coherent and ubiquitous healthcare provision for all Euro-citizens through eHealth & Health Telematics
  • To bring healthcare services into the home of every Euro-citizen
  • To facilitate this process by:-
    • Overcoming regulatory barriers,
    • Allowing remuneration flow; and
    • Identifying (and if necessary developing) appropriate technologies

eHealth Working Group (T2/T9) - EHTEL


Original Objectives


Virtual Demonstration Capability –


eHealth Best Practice Website –


Launched October 2001


Identify barriers to the widespread Deployment of eHealth – Promotion at all levels


Three Physical eHealth Demo sites


Nestor/Motion Media


Ireland


?????? Third site


Position Paper – eHealth for Europe for delivery Feb 2002



eHealth Working Group - EHTEL


Original Objectives (continued)


Solicit Industry Support – GlaxoSmithKline, Siemens, DTI (UK), Motion Media, PolyCom--Achieved and ONGOING


Grow the membership to reflect all member states - ONGOING


Invite candidate country representatives as observers –


ONGOING


Regular Meetings -


eHealth Working Group Members four meetings annually


Executive - monthly



eHealth Working Group - EHTEL


Deliverables – before July 2003


Presentations at leading telemedicine conferences across Europe


Achieved and Ongoing


Face to face meetings with senior Government Ministers, Civil Servants and Healthcare Professional Bodies across Europe


Achieved and Ongoing


Publications (peer review) and Media Appearances


Achieved and Ongoing


Self Certification process for website


Achieved and Ongoing


Physical eHealth demo sites


Achieved and Ongoing


Position Papers Months 12 and 30


Month 12 Achieved


Month 30 Ongoing



eHealth


Europe Where have we reached?


The Revolution is OVER !


eHealth is in……………. eVOLUTION!


There is much to be done!!!


eHealth


  • TeleConsultations YES - SOME
  • eDissemination of Healthcare Professional Education NOT YET
  • Public Health education & Information SOME BUT NOT FOCUSED OR UNIFORM
  • LifeTime Health Records NO
  • eHealth Services A LITTLE
  • - National ePrescribing Services


    - HomeCare Monitoring


    - eNursing


    - eMinistry of Health online websites


    Urgent Requirement


  • Pan European eHealth Research Facility
  • eHealth Applications and solutions capability
  • New applications testbed in Ireland
  • Exemplar site for Pan European use
  • Opportunities for technology companies located in Ireland

eHealth and the NHS - UK


The Consequences


National ePrescribing and eBooking Services


All Citizens - Electronic Health Record - ICRS


Massive use of - Home TeleCare


- Vital Signs Monitoring


- eNursing


Patients have choice of location and healthcare personnel


Changing role for - Primary Care Practitioners


- Pharmacists


- Nurses


The Telemedicine Blueprint Malaysia



Four Flagship Applications


  • Tele-Consultations
  • eDissemination of Continuing
    Education for all Health
    Professionals
  • Mass Customised
    Personalised Information
    and Education
  • Lifetime Health Plan

Concurrent implementation leads to reform 20 year implementation plan




Capability Through Partnerships


“Whatever affects one directly, affects all indirectly” – Martin Luther King



Large scale complex programmes benefit from an Integrated Approach


Need to work in Partnership to deliver the best results


A Holistic Approach


A Systems Approach.


Building a Partnership The South African Experience


Provide bespoke programmes based on understanding of local and international policy and standards as well as commercial developments.



The Developing World


Can leap-frog the traditional evolutionary process



Is this acceptable in our world?



Health Equity for the global community


eDissemination of Healthcare Professional education & public health information leads to ePrevention



The Healthcare Team


Doctors, Nurses, Pharmacists Technicians Administrators



If you want to work as a team


You must train as a team


Tan Sri Dato Dr Abu Bakar bin Suleiman May 2001 - Jeddah


The eHealthcare Team


Doctors, Nurses, Pharmacists, Technicians, Administrators



Integration of Health Sciences is the utmost priority to train the future eHealthcare professionals Train as a Team, Work as a Team Place the Patient at the centre of Care


Future eHealth environment



Healthcare Delivery in the new Millennium Where are we going?


  • The Multi-media Electronic Health Record
  • Integrated Health Information Systems
  • HomeCare Monitoring for the elderly/post inpatient care
  • Medical services move into the Retail Environment
  • A more holistic approach to healthcare delivery
  • - Traditional Medicine}


    - Preventive Medicine} At Primary care level


    - Self Treating Patients} “The Wellness Guardian”


    - Curative Medicine}



eHealth


The Major Consequences


Improvement of skills at primary care level


  • KEEP CARE LOCAL Super Primary Care
  • The InterNet (Broadbandwidth)


  • multi-media health records - by email
  • Constant Physiological Monitoring - Homecare


    Access to global Epi-centres of medical expertise


    Integration of medical, health, genomic, environmental, socio-economic data for ePrevention - Global Health Equity



    What’s on the electronic health horizon?


    Welcome to 2010




    Call My Agent


    The personal digital assistant of the future will do a lot more than organize our schedules and plan our days.


    In an overwhelming sea of data and messages, the Agent will use rudimentary artificial intelligence to sort, store, and forward info and messages based on individual priorities, preferences, and interests.


    It will interact with the earphone and all digital devices at work and at home, connecting them to the Net and instantly updating them. Think Palm's HotSync times 10.


    Say goodbye to money, keys, credit cards, beepers, and TV remotes.





    Phones will be low-powered, lightweight, ear-mounted, and equipped with one follow-you phone number. It connects to the Net via the Agent PDA.






    As you write with this pen, it captures your scrawled messages and beams them to your Agent PDA or your Tube rollup monitor.



    Electronic ink and GPS combine to provide a lightweight moving map that displays your exact location in all terrains.



    Comfort Zone



    In a completely wireless world, control over private space will be at a premium. Cell phones will be ringing and screens will be flashing, drowning people in a sea of data.


    Eyewear can provide a cone of silence and a zone of privacy.



    Smart Cubicles


    Workstations open completely, and the space becomes "alive," with computing and communication technology embedded in furniture and walls.


    Desks become optional as interactive screens hang from canopies, programmed to do documents, multimedia, spreadsheets, or ambient art.


    Smart chairs cancel noise and maximize comfort.


    In one generation these workstations can be controlled by thought?!


    Medical Mirror




    Broadband


    • ISDN – 1999 (64k)
    • ADSL – June 2000 (512k)
    • GPRS – Sept 2000 (56k mobile)
    • UMTS – Mid 2002 (2meg mobile)
    • Most Homes – 2003 (>2meg)
    • Personal Mobile – 2005 (>10 meg)
    • Where is it?


    Where are the challenges?? Not the technology - The People



    Health is far too important a subject to be left in the hands of the medical professionals !!!!


    Dr Halfdan Mahler - DG Emeritus - WHO


    after Oscar Wilde


    eHealth


    In the new world order, the ePatient will be in an electronic care continuum with global medical knowledge


    Dr Ron Merrell,


    Virginia Commonwealth University, USA


    Prishtina, Kosova,


    October 2002


    The Watershed Generation Gap



    • HUMAN NEURO-PHYSIOLOGY IS CHANGING

    Mary Lobascher 2000


    Value of Broadband to schools

    Current status of ICT in schools


    NCTE conducted a full national census of ICT in schools on three occasions: in 1998 (with Telecom Eireann), in 2000, and in 2002. The census had an overall response rate of 83%,


    Some Initial findings of ICT in schools census 2002


    Numbers of computers


    The schools that responded reported a total of 67,350 computers. These figures may be adjusted upwards to take into account the schools that did not respond. Assuming that the schools that did not respond had the same average number of computers as those that did respond, this suggests that the total number of computers in schools was 84,663.


    This is a 65% increase on the number reported in 2000 (51,307).


    Number of computers and pupil computer ratio


    Primary

    Post primary

    Special schools

    Number of computers reported

    34,122

    31,700

    1,528

    Average pupil computer ratio

    11.8

    9.4

    3.9

    2000 pupil computer ratio

    18.1

    13.0

    6.6

    1998 pupil computer ratio

    37

    16

    9

    Since1998, based on an investment of some €140m, significant progress has been made in this regard.


    Schools were asked to report the amount of money spent on ICT in addition to the grants received from NCTE


    Additional expenditure on ICT


    Primary

    Post primary

    Special schools

    Total “additional expenditure on ICT” since 2000

    5,165,456

    8,286,468

    242,624

    Average additional expenditure per school

    4,287

    21,523

    5,777

    Source of additional funds. % of schools who answered the question reporting each type.

    Primary

    Post primary

    Special schools

    Parent contribution

    39.9

    29.9

    19.0

    Fundraising activities

    47.2

    24.2

    33.3

    Commercial sponsorship

    16.5

    8.8

    28.6

    Other school funds

    42.2

    61.3

    85.7

    Pattern of Pupil Computer ratio


    The 2000 data revealed that disadvantaged schools were better-equipped, on average than other schools. This pattern continued in 2002. Disadvantaged primary schools, on average, had a pupil computer ratio of 10.5 to 1, compared with 11.9 in other schools. At the post primary level the disadvantaged schools had an average of 7.8 students per computer, compared with 10 for other schools.


    Disadvantaged schools


    Average PCR

    Primary

    Post primary

    Disadvantaged

    10.5

    7.8

    Not disadvantaged

    11.9

    10.0

    In 2000 there were significant differences in level of equipment between different types of post primary school. Vocational schools were the best equipped, and voluntary secondary schools were least equipped. These patterns persisted in 2002. Vocational schools had an average of 66. pupils per computer, compared with 8.3 for community schools and 11.3 for voluntary secondary schools.


    Post primary school type


    Average PCR

    N of schools

    Average PCR

    Community

    57

    8.3

    Comprehensive

    13

    8.5

    Vocational

    180

    6.6

    Voluntary Sec

    297

    11.3

    Total

    547

    9.4

    Location of computers in the school


    % of reported computers in each location

    Primary

    Post primary

    Special

    Classrooms

    49.5

    6.8

    63.7

    Computer room

    28.7

    61.3

    13.7

    Administration

    6.2

    6.6

    9.2

    Assigned to individual pupils with special needs

    5.0

    1.7

    3.5

    Mobile computers, laptops (not assigned to individual pupils)

    4.8

    3.3

    6.2

    General resource areas/library

    3.0

    2.5

    1.8

    Other (please specify)

    2.8

    3.5

    1.9

    Laboratories

    -

    3.5

    -

    Staff room or staff work areas

    -

    2.8

    -

    Learning support / remedial room

    -

    2.7

    -

    Careers room

    -

    2.1

    -

    Special classes

    -

    1.7

    -

    Special needs resource room

    -

    1.5

    -

    Classrooms with ICT


    Primary1

    Post primary

    Special schools

    % of classrooms with a computer

    74.8

    21.6

    84.1

    % of classrooms with Internet access

    30.1

    12.9

    29.3

    Networking and Internet access


    Primary

    Post primary

    Special schools

    % of computers networked

    30.5

    69.3

    19.3

    % of computers with access to the Internet

    38.8

    66.1

    32.6

    % of schools with Internet access on multiple machines via network or router

    22.3

    86.2

    23.6

    In 2000, 69% of post primary schools had Internet access via an ISDN line, but by 2002 this had risen to 85%. While most post-primary schools had ISDN, very few had broadband, with only 3.5% having DSL connections, and 1.9% having satellite connections.


    In the primary and special schools the picture was and remains very different. The majority of schools were using telephone lines to access the Internet, and less than one third had ISDN connections


    Internet connection


    Primary

    Post primary

    Special

    Via a standard telephone line (PSTN)

    72.4

    7.8

    65.6

    Via an ISDN line

    26.8

    85.4

    32.3

    Via a DSL broadband connection

    0.5

    3.5

    0.0

    Via a satellite broadband connection

    0.2

    1.9

    0.0

    Other (e.g., leased line cable)

    0.2

    1.5

    2.2

    Primary

    Post primary

    Special schools

    Average hours online each month

    14.0

    56.8

    24.6

    2000 average

    8.6

    42.9

    9.8

    Use of the Internet


    Primary

    Post primary

    Special schools

    % of schools with email

    89.8

    92.7

    85.7

    % of schools that provide email accounts for teachers

    16.2

    22.5

    14.3

    % of schools that provide email accounts for pupils

    4.8

    16.0

    5.7

    % of schools with an Acceptable Use Policy for safe use of the Internet

    61.3

    67.0

    50.5

    % of schools with a website

    19.3

    55.9

    21.0

    % of schools with a website that carries project of curricular work done by pupils

    11.7

    15.6

    5.7

    Pupil use of the Internet and email


    Never

    Occasionally

    Frequently

    % of pupils who use email at school:

    Primary

    59.5

    34.7

    5.9

    Post-primary

    50.2

    31.3

    18.5

    Special

    54.7

    29.1

    16.2

    % of pupils who use Internet at school:

    Primary

    33.2

    51.8

    15.1

    Post-primary

    22.8

    44.0

    33.2

    Special

    29.1

    49.8

    21.0

    Type of Internet use


    Most frequent uses of the Internet. % of schools that replied indicating frequent or regular use of the Internet for each of:

    Primary

    Post primary

    Special schools

    Pupils learning to use the Internet

    30.8

    33.6

    23.1

    Pupils using online learning resources

    28.1

    26.2

    15.2

    Pupils using searches to do their research

    31.8

    35.5

    13.5

    Teachers finding teaching resources

    64.0

    35.3

    37.9

    Teachers engaging in discussions online

    5.1

    2.2

    6.8

    Teachers engaging in professional development online courses, educational research

    5.8

    7.2

    12.6

    Teachers finding educational news and information on current events

    49.6

    58.9

    62.0

    School priorities and needs


    % high or very high priority

    Primary

    Post primary

    Special schools

    To get all pupils to a basic level of ICT skill

    96.3

    96.4

    89.1

    To get some pupils involved in high level ICT projects

    44.0

    65.5

    47.1

    To get all teachers involved in using ICT in their teaching

    85.2

    76.2

    96.7

    To integrate ICT into curricular subjects

    89.1

    77.3

    92.3

    Finding more suitable software/ on-line resources

    84.9

    77.3

    94.5

    To use ICT to support students with special needs

    94.9

    92.7

    97.8

    To ensure that pupils with no computer at home are not disadvantaged

    94.0

    87.2

    82.4

    To promote access to ICT by parents/ the wider community

    28.6

    50.4

    26.1

    To provide ICT training for parents/ the wider community

    21.0

    51.3

    24.5

    % high or very high priority

    Primary

    Post primary

    Special schools

    More computers in a central computer room

    42.7

    56.5

    16.0

    More computers distributed around classrooms

    69.9

    85.8

    64.8

    More computers for administration

    35.3

    47.1

    31.0

    % high or very high priority

    Primary

    Post primary

    Special schools

    Additional computer equipment

    79.1

    86.9

    73.3

    Replacement/renewal of older equipment

    78.3

    90.5

    82.2

    Provision for technical support or maintenance

    89.4

    92.2

    86.7

    Faster Internet access

    58.9

    75.8

    48.8

    Internet access on more computers

    57.2

    64.3

    61.6

    Development of a school network

    47.1

    65.8

    33.7

    Independent advice on purchase of hardware

    63.0

    64.1

    66.7

    Funding software purchase/licences

    83.2

    93.0

    86.8

    International comparisons increasingly underline the growing gap which exists in ICT provision against cutting edge education systems internationally. The EU Eurobarometer Survey of ICT in schools (2002) shows that Ireland is under the EU average for pupil to computer ratios (EU avg. 9:1) with the leading countries averaging as follows : Denmark 3:1, Finland 6:1, UK and Sweden 7:1. Ireland averages 10:1.


    Ireland is last in the EU in the provision of broadband connectivity within schools (0%), the EU average is 32% with Sweden, Denmark and Finland at 60% or above and the UK (where there is a commitment to 100% broadband provision by 2005) at 27%.


    Neither is it a co-incidence that the high ranking Nordic/Scandanavian countries are also the most technologically advanced and most profound users of ICT.


    Investment in ICT for the future


    Substantial funding will be required in the years ahead in the following broad areas:


    To provide schools with the necessary equipment, networks and support, including technical maintenance


    To ensure broadband connectivity to the classroom


    To enhance teacher proficiency in ICT managed learning


    To integrate ICT in the curriculum and provide digital resources for use in the classroom


    Broadband in schools


    The ‘always on’ nature of broadband connections allows school students to use the internet more easily as an everyday teaching, learning and research tool in the classroom. High bandwidth also enhances the effectiveness of classroom learning Schools need access to an information technology infrastructure including high levels of connectivity at an affordable price.


    Broadband is required in schools :


    • video and multimedia applications
    • Online learning environments (VLE/MLE) with digital repositories of online e-learning materials to support teaching and learning international research networks to support Irish researchers and educators
    • systems for communication, networking and collaboration for both students and teachers
    • school to school collaborations and e-twinning, locally, nationally and EU wide
    • online professional development
    • complex reporting and assessment systems
    • student/school administration systems
    • budgeting, finance and management systems.

    Digital Literacy


    The global knowledge society requires an additional range of life skills if each individual is to fully participate in and benefit from the new digital age which now emerging.


    The digital divide is not just about those who have no access to technology but about those who do not have the skills to use it effectively. We must ensure that our young people, especially those in disadvantaged areas, are provided with all these skills in their schools and that learning is made more attractive leading to greater educational achievement.


    Digital technologies and their applications have the potential to make learning exciting and highly participative. The provision of content-rich, user-friendly digital resources for teaching and learning will be a key requirement if this potential is to be fully realised. By digital literacy we mean that citizens can intelligently use technologies, such as the Internet to locate appropriate content, but more importantly, that they can creatively produce their own content in a digital format – whether it be a Web page, a piece of computer-assisted art, a digital radio or video programme or their own multi-media composition.


    Digital literacy is much more than the ability to read and write. It includes the ability to intelligently read all types of visual and aural information and to actively communicate ideas in visual formats; the ability to find and evaluate information and the skills to communicate ideas in visual and other formats.


    The innovative use of digital technologies is a key challenges facing education for the future. It provides opportunities for creativity, collaboration and expression – individually or in groups. It will help to unlock the unique individual potential to shine which every student possesses.


    Digital media has the potential to make learning exciting and highly participative. It allow us to be creative and active producers of digital content on an individual or team basis. One of the reasons that the computer games industry, an industry bigger than the film industry, has grown so rapidly is that the newer games allow the user to engage in character and narrative development and environment creation. The player becomes the creator.


    In general, the provision of rich interactive resources through broadband will provide schools with an unique opportunity to develop new classroom strategies for learning and teaching – one where cross-curricular learning takes place at the pupils own pace and learning style. Pupils will learn and practice higher order skills at a younger age and individualized learning will be enabled. Learning will be participative and collaborative.



    Atlantic Technology Corridor


    Building a World Class Technology Cluster



    ATC Advisory Board

    • Dick Meaney, Analog Devices, Chairman, ATC
    • Oliver Daniels, ADC, Vice Chairman, ATC
    • Pat Shanahan, CEO, ATC
    • Industry
    • Mike Conroy, Nortel Networks


      Noel Fogarty, Boston Scientific


      Chris Coughlan, Hewlett Packard


      Reginald Freake, Dell Computers


      Kieran MacSweeney, Avocent


      Michael Byrne, Ennis Information Age Services


      Gerry Joyce, Chorus & ShannonSoft


      Seamus Kilbane, NetIQ & ITAG


      David Silke, Nortel Networks


    • Universities
    • Cyril Burkley, University of Limerick


      Roy Green, N.U.I. Galway


    • Development Agencies
    • Kevin Thompstone, Shannon Development


      Emmanuel Dowdall, Western Regional Manager, IDA


      Seamus Bree, Enterprise Ireland


      Jim Keogh, Udaras na Gaeltachta


      Mike Foley, Shannon Development


    Cluster Profile


    Characteristics of an Emerging Cluster

    • Presence of ‘critical mass’ of innovative and dynamic firms in a single sector or related sectors, within a concentrated geographical area.
    • Inter-firm collaboration in research, skills and product development to generate scale economies for regions in global markets.
    • Linkages with research and education institutions to build innovative capacity through spin-off companies and commercialisation of ideas.

    The ATC Challenge

    Build a world class technology cluster


    • Change our/the mindset to build and drive a singular identity which represents the Corridor.
    • Catalyst for the transition from a manufacturing to a knowledge based economy.
    • Industry led initiative, significant in size, sustained over time, building critical mass.
    • Information, communications and medical technology companies.
    • Boundaryless Corridor, initially Galway to Limerick but expanding north and south.
    • Partners in National Spatial Strategy
    • counter balance to east coast cluster.


    Cluster Profile



    Opportunities and Constraints


    Common Issues for Technology Companies

    • Worldwide ICT recession and competition.
    • Rising costs and higher costs in regions.
    • Infrastructure deficits in air, road and telecommunications.
    • Competitive advantage increasingly based on skills and ingenuity – 3rd level course choice?
    • Build research/innovation linkages with Universities.
    • Collaboration as well as competition to drive more business.
    • Government support for broader regional concepts and strategies.

    …The Four Pillars…


    ATC Broadband Infrastructure

    • “In the Knowledge Economy, the ability to create, distribute and exploit knowledge and information is the main source of competitive advantage, wealth creation and improvements in the quality of life. Hence the availability of world class broadband telecommunications infrastructures and services is a critical factor in the investment location decisions of firms, particularly in exploiting the opportunities for higher-paid, higher value added employment”.
    • Cost effective broadband access is an imperative.
    • Telecommunications infrastructure must equate with Dublin in terms of availability, cost, levels of competition and capacity.
    • The existing duopoly of service providers is not fulfilling competitive business needs.
    • A shortage of carrier neutral infrastructure is an impediment.

    ATC Cluster Priorities

    • Completion of the N18 Limerick to Galway dual carriageway is an immediate and critical requirement.
    • Shannon Airport must be best transformed into an effective European regional and Transatlantic hub.
    • Broadband telecommunications costs must be a parity with Dublin prices.
    • Increase networking between MNCs and SMEs.
    • Increase research activity between industry and 3rd level educational institutes.

    Call to Action

    • Increased Collaboration
    • MNCs <> SMEs


      Industry <> University research


      Development agencies.


    • Government setting priority on infrastructure to enable a critical national asset.
    • ATC Cluster as the enabler of innovation and increased competitiveness.

    Broadband: Reducing the gender and other Socio-Digital Divides


    Experience, Education, and Effect


    By Frances M Buggy, MBA – Business and Government technology consultant.


    A presentation to the Joint Oireachtas committee on Broadband, July 2003


    Most inequities, including those of gender, opportunity, and education - apparent in the digital world, are due to socio-economic factors and socio-cultural expectations that apply generally, rather than to any particular characteristic of the technology itself. This is borne out by the work of many analysts including Proff. E. Trauth of PennState University. http://www.ist.psu.edu
    With the correct prioritisation of deployment, Broadband can enable a partial reversal of some of the generally evident geographic, educational and economic inequities.


    Women are among the many disadvantaged groups when it comes to accessing the Internet in the optimum way. Ideally access should not be by dial-up – the “demand killer” as evidenced by relatively stagnant Irish Internet access rates; but by affordable high speed always on connection delivering decent bandwidth experience at all hours of the day 7 days per week.


    The primary reason for this gender disadvantage is because in Ireland technology is normally accessed first and fastest, in the workplace, where women are under-represented. This under-representation is further compounded by the disproportionately low number of women in the technology facing sectors of Science, Engineering and ICT study disciplines and resultant careers.


    The manner in which one accesses the Internet greatly influences ones usage patterns – home based access is primarily dial-up access at realistic Irish speeds of around 33 on a 56k modem. This method of access inhibits and often prohibits the key activities of the Internet – search, appreciation of the structuring of information, online collaboration, audio-visual shared learning


    The bridging of this predominantly urban/ rural, male/female, educated/uneducated, and single/family based digital divides will be broadband enabled but fuelled by the stimulation of an appetite for education and advancement among under represented groups, and by parents for their children.


    In society, women are generally community builders and usually passionately interested in the education of their families - these two behavioural factors can be leveraged when women in communities, and as parents are targeted and encouraged to get involved in learning more about using the internet to ensure that with their guidance, their children and their communities can compete effectively.


    Broadband, through the provision of secure high speed remote access to the work and educational infrastructure can also be used by these same women and men to facilitate upskilling and re-entry to their careers following a parental career break; and reduce the pressure to choose between parenting and a career. This should increase the retention and progression of skilled qualified women in SET, whose numbers are already at a low base.


    These findings are supported by the Greenfield Report, commissioned by the DTI/UK government to address how the UK economy can ensure it fulfils its innovation potential through the retention and induction of Women into Science Engineering and Technology. Dr. Lucy Cusack of Forfas has initiated a similar examination process for Ireland


    Some objectives of this presentation


    1. Encourage public representatives to look at this infrastructure, not as the sum of its component parts – but as a cost effective enabler of socio-economic re-balancing…” Focus on the Swan, not the paddling”
      Particularly in the key areas of:
      • Lifelong Learning and R & D to international standards,
      • Facilitated by Work/Life balance initiatives for both genders in the workplace. Flexible work practices and Management by Objectives rather than by presence - for men and women in ICT and SET in particular, as these areas are often characterised at senior levels by long working hours.
    2. Foster a SUPPLY driven model in infrastructural roll-out, which does not require knowledgeable demand before roll-out of the experience. Broadband=Enablement, should ignorance/disadvantage preclude enablement?
    3. Both conceptually and operationally, separate any infrastructure from the licensing of a carrier to run services on it – encouraging a truly competitive, value, added universal service.

      E.g. Jan Carlson of SAS said in 1970 at the start of the Customer service revolution, “We fly people not planes” – adopt a mindset, which focuses on obligations for service delivery rather than the infrastructural elements.


    4. Effective Reversal of general societal inequities could be measured against key benchmarks of increased female participation and retention in the workforce, particularly in the Science Engineering and Technology disciplines where they are least prevalent and where Ireland needs to make an International impact; together with increased uptake of lifelong learning by women and men who are parents.

    Some General Usage Inequities and constraints:
    1/File sizes are becoming larger as modern educational and organisational competitiveness depends increasingly on speedy real time exchange of large volumes of data, images, and real time audio and video interaction for meetings, interviews, consultations and project management. Broadband by definition is really a low contention method of transferring files of .5 to 2mg on average.


    If users are caught in a bandwidth bottleneck as is common especially in the indigenous SME sector – it has been proven that they will negatively amend their behaviour, and if the bottleneck no longer exists – they begin to fully exploit the technology, and become more cost effective, competitive, more creative, and more innovative.


    2/Conference organisers are very confined by high event-related communications costs and negligible bandwidth, which inhibits the international exchange of real time, shared learning by live audio visual conferencing for example. E.G. Due to communications unreliability in a range of venues throughout the country including Dublin, in over 5 years of running Irish and International events with the IIA – we never once used live infrastructure to deliver presentations or content – it was always from a stored file on a CD


    Spatial Planning and Budgeting
    Until comparatively recently, Broadband has not been mentioned in NDP or NSS documents, and has not been specifically reflected in planning and local government legislation. This fact if uncorrected, has the potential to further inhibit broad understanding and therefore broad exploitation of available technologies and the continued under exploitation of related infrastructural opportunities as they arise at local, regional and National level.


    • Place broadband at the top of the infrastructural agenda, and insist that all infrastructural projects always include a 20-25% contribution to covering the cost of parallel broadband rollout – as it has a transforming multiplier effect on all other infrastructure
    • Encourage NIRSA, ComReg, and the NSS team at the Department of the Environment to carry out a cost benefit analysis comparing broadband spend with other infrastructures – the multiplier effect is greater.
    • Immediately reflect this raising of Broadband nearer to the top of the priority list in the NSS planning guidelines currently being developed at local and regional level

    Supply Driven Rollout

    It has become obvious since deregulation in 2000 that Ireland cannot depend on Telecoms companies or demand drivers alone to deliver broadband.


    To have demand one must:


    • Know what one is missing, Broadband is like the AA, you don’t miss it until you have used it to avoid being left on the side of the road watching others pass you by
    • And have pre-existing and RELEVANT online INTERACTIVE SERVICES rather than static Content which one wishes to access. (Ref. Online usage patterns highlighted by IIA surveys and Global Usage surveys from the Global Visualisation Unit of Vanderbilt University in USA (www.vanderbilt.edu)

    It is valid to compare the transformational effect of widely available affordable broadband, with that of the last major Supply driven rollout: Rural Electrification


    a scheme that revolutionised Ireland in the past,


    Affordable available Broadband will have a MORE transforming effect


    • Because before electricity people could still access available information by newspaper and steam radio, But if one does not have affordable broadband there is really no existing substitute. One is already cut off from significant informational, educational; R & D, collaborative and marketplace /procurement resources already open to other competing Nations.
    • TV only became possible following electricity supply – what application could follow widely available Broadband?

    Broadband infrastructure and the telecoms market Eircom and BT/Esat will act only on a business case basis, and on energetic compulsion by Comreg, and the Competition Authority. Their “2 Telco waltz” around the regulatory environment, has deferred their need to invest, and has cost Ireland its advantage over emerging Eastern European countries. (See comparative cost and performance tables on http://www.irelandoffline.org) I applaud the efforts of Min Aherne and ComReg regulator Etaine Doyle in this regard to date.


    Some infrastructural recommendations

    - True competition drops price and increases access – Support ComReg and the Competition Authority in their efforts to ensure real competition in the marketplace, and actively encourage Eircom to wholesale single billing, and realistically and economically unbundle the Last mile of copper into Irish homes.


    - In this way, so the home or small office user can reduce the access bottleneck and pre-select any carrier by bandwidth availability, quality of service, cost effectivess; and availability of single billing. Line Rental /Multiple billing and modem adjustment requirements are effective barriers to entry for residential users, and residential users yield a lower return than business users so until comparatively recently – telecom companies were content to argue about LLU rather than work to change it.


    - M.A.N management company (MSE) should be an expanded resource almost like the Treasury Management Agency – but be a National Network Management Agency, and have entitlement to confidential access to full information from commercial carriers as to infrastructure roll out and usage, to avoid further shameful duplication and allow the National Network to avail of other infrastructural build opportunities.


    - MAN – look at innovative rollout mechanisms which might save money and allow for interconnection of the MAN rings – and the ability to charge private carriers using the infrastructure, to defray the cost


    - Broadband is Not just DSL – reality of access is required rather than an aspirational press release – e.g. 88 out of 440 exchanges are supposedly DSL enabled, but in reality only some of the exchanges quoted in advertisements can currently deliver broadband, and even then – only to within 2.5km of the exchange.


    - Because broadband is not just DSL there is a need to focus on the solutions for locations which are 2.5 KM or more away from the nearest DSL-enabled exchange, as the Irish population is dispersed throughout rural areas and in urban clusters of insufficient scale to command the urgent interest of a telecoms company. E.g. Hotspots/ Wireless LANs, broadband VPN’s, Satellite enabled asynchronous access, splayed access for business and community users enabled by the MAN rollout.


    - ComReg need to continue to exert pressure on: LLU rates, single billing of all services, FRIACO, and encouraging the aggressive rollout of smaller competitive services – satellite enabled, fixed wireless etc – combinations which have an enabling effect on existing infrastructure.


    Demand stimulation:

    It is essential to take an omnipresent supply model approach to broadband provision, but develop value added demand driver services in parallel. These demand drivers could be funded through – co-ordinating public/private submission of Interreg, FP6 eTen Telecom and eContent funded projects of National and Regional significance, before we lose our 75% funding status in 2006 (Objective 1 in Transition)


    [The experience I have gained - working with National stakeholders at regional level to resolve ICT issues of National and regional importance leads one to believe that the South-East Information Society Strategy a 6 county project in the SE - is Ireland in microcosm.]


    Demand drivers include:


    1/eTailing:


    1. The active visibility critical mass of retailers and service providers on the Irish marketplace which could attract large volumes of consumer and SME transactions,


    2. Actively driving Irish users online through improved service levels and discount incentives only available online, together with effective budgeted integration of online media in the corporate marketing mix/media schedule. A cursory glance at UK TV advertising provides evidence of the contrast in approach by retail and service providers serving the UK versus the Irish market - most Irish advertisers don’t have an electronic marketing budget and many don’t even quote their web address!


    3. Relevant online services which stimulate interest whether one is male or female: eLearning/blended learning, Work Life Balance/eWorking; eHealth, eGovernment services, eBanking with more competitive offers online.


    2/e Health:


    The primary care and diagnostic sectors could be revolutionised, taking pressure off the hospital sector and facilitating faster diagnosis, better aftercare, and more effective patient care in their own homes – where they want to be. E.g.


    • Broadband circulation of large volumes of shared data and bio-image files between specialists and centres of excellence, rather than moving ill patients by ambulance on poor roads from the regions to Dublin.
    • Broadband transmission of MRI and CT scans instead of duplication of expensive tests upon admission, or unnecessary road movement just to facilitate specialist consultation.
    • Home PC’s/laptops with broadband connections and a web cam attached – all cheap technology – for audiovisual monitoring and conversing with some patients who are home-based through illness;

    3/eGovernment service development:


    Certain eGovernment services depend on National deployment from Departmental back-end systems – however a different non-centralised approach is required at local government level.


    One which focuses on the on the transaction/knowledge management capability development of services from individual local authority back-ends, using process mapping, increased standardisation of database and firewall formats, rather than on what the front end forms will look like. A Possible focus on local back ends, potential data-mining, and common process mapping as developmental drivers – by CMOD & LGCSB & rollout in pilot regions – eg the six local authority IT departments in the South-East already work closely together in this regard and would be an ideal site for pilot trials. EGovernment should be about enhancing and re-inventing the relationship with the citizen – not just automating it.


    Also work to make eGovernment content relevant to every citizen instead of being an expression of organisational administration – the OASIS website is a good example of this approach – it is organised around Life events rather than departmental administration.


    4/eLearning: The current approach Nationally, appears to be characterised by too much fragmentation, and a lack of “joined-up” thinking by policy makers and those in charge of 3 rd level bodies
    Too much fragmentation currently exists in the manner of third level eLearning deployment in Ireland - The withdrawal of €10million funding for a shared National eLearning platform is one of the single biggest mistakes made in Ireland – as there is now duplication of spending on an individual organisation basis instead of a co-ordinated approach that creates a shared platform/eLearning infrastructure for use by all third level bodies.


    This lack of a shared National platform can create a situation where Institutes of technology and Universities are effectively hostages to fortune in terms of high-ticket renewable campus licences and duplicate implementation charges from primarily 2 US/UK based eLearning companies.


    A National eLearning platform co-ordinated by HEA might have combined the provision of global best practice in a manner which minimised licence cost and optimised shared organisational learning, and both indigenously and internationally provided functionality.


    Lifelong blended learning will be the key to National and industrial continuous improvement, increased competitiveness, and the facilitation of career change among disadvantaged groups in Ireland


    A 36% drop in secondary school leavers is envisaged in the short to medium term; and this should concentrate the minds of those running bodies of Higher education of the need to focus their efforts on more easily distributed Blended Lifelong learning without any perceptual bias against non-traditional methods of delivering undergraduate or postgraduate programmes.


    PHD and Executive MBA programmes are among the kind of programmes, which lend themselves to this kind of blended delivery; the third level sector in Ireland must now compete with the top “Ivy league” in the US and Europe – who can sell their strongly branded, and prestigious educational offerings worldwide – using broadband enabled computer mediated environments.


    Education:


    While education is a demand driver for Broadband, it is also crucial to look at how our education system is performing in terms of the creation of adequate numbers of male and female students pursuing careers in the key science engineering and technology sectors.


    The HEA reports show the disproportionate involvement of urban rather than rural lifelong learners, and male rather than female students in disciplines of national economic significance, which are natural usage areas for broadband enabled collaboration and R/D – Science Engineering and ICT technologies.


    To reverse some of these trends, which underpin the digital, and SET divide, some educational initiatives are essential:


    1/Active SET Careers Guidance Intervention is required with final year primary/First year secondary school students in co-ed and Girls only schools by well-briefed career guidance teachers and guest speakers from a county-by county mentor panel of women who have built careers in Science Engineering and Technology. (SET) (Ref. www.witsireland.com talent bank)


    This intervention should be aimed at influencing informed subject choice as early as possible – so that Mathematics, Physics, and Chemistry are available, demystified and chosen as subjects throughout second level, especially by girls. Possibly suggesting an approach to Business careers through a more balanced pursuit of graduate SET degrees and post-graduate business degrees.


    2/Extra points could be allocated to these SET and R/D enabling subjects, as in the past with Irish – to encourage choice and retention to Leaving Certificate.


    3/Extra curricular and inter-school activities which focus on these subject areas should be encouraged and funded through public-private partnerships between government, academia and relevant regional and industry groupings


    4/Educational infrastructure should be actively designed to facilitate shared learning and collaboration


    E.g. HEANET running professionally managed networks at secondary as well as third level;


    Implement wireless LAN’s of student laptops to encourage informal clusters of computer mediated activity;


    Change from desktop to laptop provision at secondary level to increase the computing lifestyle of students and ensure that the student’s family are encouraged in their involvement with the laptop enabled online access to homework resources.


    Move existing desktops in secondary schools to the primary sector so that children learn to play with technology before they develop any “received” learning barriers


    Ensure that each school is a wireless hotspot which can recoup funds through splaying its signal to neighbouring commercial or community organisations not on the public MAN


    Re-design school insurance and staffing arrangements so that their community can avail of school broadband access after school hours for community training or development initiatives.


    5/ Certified Lifelong learning and career conversion strategies, need to be delivered in a Blended fashion (offline and online) to facilitate:


    • A Work Life balance for men and women - consciously developed with public and private sector support -so that it is possible to hold down a full time job while pursuing career enhancing degree level education
    • Career conversion of women from commerce and communication fields to possible project management careers using the same accumulated skills - in Science Engineering and Technology should be prioritised by the Forfas Expert Skills Group, HEA, and Science Foundation of Ireland
    • Built on a community based familiarity with and enthusiasm for ICT’s gained through free well-tutored online experience gained on ideally HEANET network enabled secondary school computing equipment

    Work-Life Balance/eWork:


    Use broadband as an enabler of Work-Life balance for both men and women – so that part of ones working week does not involve commuting, facilitates intensive periods of quiet research and administration from home or preferably from ones nearest dedicated eWork centre, and access to high bandwidth resources for career development, lifelong learning, and collaboration in virtual teams.


    Ework and Flexible working: Clustered rather than home based eWork solutions need to be provided at entry and senior levels for very different but compelling reasons.


    These clusters should be supported by all the public and private regional stakeholders, ideally located on the edge of every regional Campus of further education or in dedicated rural catchment centres – so that quality broadband access can be associated with the economically essential activity of shared lifelong learning, secured remote access to the corporate environment and community involvement, rather than any one private company, government agency or regional stakeholder.


    The positive effect of this cluster phenomenon, especially for women re-entering their careers, is borne out by various studies in Flexible working e.g. (www.flexwork.eu.net), and the experience of community groups who have made a great success of any of the CAIT (Dept. Environment) funded initiatives.


    1. eWork needs to lose the association with low-income telecottage/part-time activity and needs to be appreciated by employers and staff alike as a life/career enhancing extension of the secure infrastructure of the workplace.


    2. It is essential that the management of those availing of remote /technology enabled flexible work arrangements select motivated senior people from both genders irrespective of perceptions of their parental status.


    3. MBO: Achievement of objectives should be uppermost in staff evaluation terms, rather than the current status quo of expectation of evidence of the employee’s presence over excessively long hours in a centralised office.


    4. It is also essential that public or private sector eWork/Flexible working does not confine those availing of it to low status part-time work, nor does it preclude those availing of it from promotional opportunities.


    eLogistics and roadspace management


    Broadband enablement is particularly appropriate for Ireland, as we need to export more internationally tradable services and goods with a high value to weight ratio – i.e. goods with a significant service-wrap/ software/ service value-add.


    - Without this infrastructure for larger indigenous Irish industry, our GDP suffers, exports are depressed, and cost effective procurement of sub supply becomes merely an aspiration.


    - Broadband makes more effective supply chain management possible, and companies can focus on value add activities on a more competitive cost base.


    - In Ireland we have a disproportionate dependency on road transport, and a relatively poor road infrastructure. Broadband can allow one to locate and manage warehouses and stock movements in a manner, which optimises the available infrastructure, minimises road related delays, and improve the administration of delivery management.


    Among its many transformational effects, access to Broadband can make geography – into history.



    Citizens On Line


    www.dublin.ie:


    Creating


    an E based Community in the City


    www.dublin.ie - promoting the Dublin City Strategic Plan



    • Key issues in CDB Strategy Development
    • Key issues in Integration: access to information; shared database; virtual one stop shop
    • Key issues in Social inclusion: avoid digital divide; empower through ICT; integrate knowledge, entertainment and business
    • Key issues in Participation: Providing access and enabling authorship and shaping of information to needs

    What is Dublin.ie?



    • www.dublin.ie is a web portal which provides a gateway to all citizens in Dublin
    • It’s a one-stop shop providing a bridge linking people, information and services
    • It provides an open forum inviting citizens to discuss issues online
    • It houses 14 marketplaces with valuable up-to-the minute information on everything from Sport to Democracy.

    Dublin.ie - The Gateway to the City



    Summary of the Project


    In this project we are trying to create an audience in many ways:


    i) create online services relevant to the every day to day life of a city dweller.


    ii) use technologies that are within the culture and reach of everyone, e.g. TV access.


    iii) provide education and training in technology and the opportunity for community groups to participate.



    • iv) look to a long-term sustainable model on which government services can ‘piggy back’.
    • v) the servicing of information and relevance is handled at a micro interest level without obligation of state to provide continuous support.

    The Key is to develop a “content management system” which every user can use to update their content.


    Project Objectives


    • Establish a shared vision and consensus among the public and commercial sectors around developing dynamic digital content targeted at local communities.
    • Address the danger of increasing social exclusion through the digital divide.
    • Develop multi-focused theme marketplaces involving citizens, communities of interest, businesses and the public sector.


    • Create innovative avenues of communication and access
    • Build capacity for content management among the community and voluntary organizations, NGOs, the small business, community and statutory agencies
    • Increase demand for and ability to access on line public services

    Why Communities on the web and how...?


    • Establish presence through the Directory by means of business card and profile statement…lifted from registration form
    • Create for members and for potential members website with dynamic and static information
    • Join a community/communities of interest, the marketplaces and share information, goods, resources, opportunities and access price reduction on goods and services.

    What is available now on www.dublin.ie?


    • Web information base: CDB & County info, links to agencies
    • Content management system on all pages, including User logon
    • Free email facility linked to yourcounty @ yourcounty.ie
    • Hosted and managed service
    • Special incentives from local companies featured on banners
    • Links to other sites and search engines


    • Free web sites for community groups & small business
    • Searchable directory of local services (including Councillors)
    • Facilities database and booking facility
    • E Payment gateway
    • Events / funding opportunities information/calendar
    • News features organised by group/sector















    Coming soon to www.dublin.ie


    • Range of Marketplaces built around Community needs. E.g. Family Marketplace: Constantly updated information on:
    • childcare provision
    • number of places
    • number of staff
    • employment opportunities
    • and location.

    New features on www.dublin.ie


    • A Marketplace brings all the websites that belong to Childcare organisations or interested bodies into a shared space. It allows agencies with services to link. It allows reduced price access to commerce.
    • E Democracy facility linking Civil Society, Local Govt, National Govt, and European Govt. (linked to Governance projects under Framework III)




    • Facility to print a “newsletter” on line and in hard copy by drawing the information from website content. Will also allow for brochure production.
    • Consultation Manager: permitting gathering information
    • Collating and analysing data, providing feedback (Off line version)
    • On Line polling based on relevant issues

    Coming soon to www.dublin.ie


    • Mapping of locations and services
    • On Line census/data research facility
    • On Line interagency “chat rooms”& case conference facility
    • Schools interactive network including closed webspace for classmates.


    Future Potential Value of Broadband to Ireland Inc.

    Presented by


    Joe Macri, General Manager


    Microsoft Ireland


    to Oireachtas ICT Sub-Committee


    On Thursday, 5th June 2003


    Proposed Agenda

    • Innovation & adoption
    • Applications & realising benefits
    • Barriers to address & recommendations


    Digital Decade

    • Citizen
      • Entertainment: News, Gaming, Music/Video
      • Educational: Connected learning community
      • Vocational: skills & lifelong learning
    • Business
      • Productivity gains e.g. e-procurement
      • New services e.g. on-line customer care
      • FDI: supporting vision of moving up the value chain
    • Government
      • Citizen services
      • Productivity gains
      • e-inclusion

    Realising Benefits

    • Increased long term GDP
    • Increased Business growth (new, relocation)
    • Promotes Job Growth (traditional & Hi-Tech)
    • Increased Tax Base
    • Business Anywhere (geography, location)
    • Provides Increased Network Security

    Source: The Payoff of Ubiquitous Broadband Deployment - Gartner


    Barriers to address

    • Cost
    • Access – Ireland has the 3rd lowest penetration of PC in the home in western Europe
    • Education – Ireland is 3rd last in EU for access to computers & IT in the classroom
    • Perception

    Recommendations

    • Citizen Access
    • 1. Discounts for disadvantaged people


      2. Group purchase


      3. Public IT literacy programme


    • Physical Access
    • 1. Remote rural satellite service


      2. Building certification scheme


      3. Incentives for home PC adoption


    • Education sector
    • 1. Free broadband to schools


      2. Extend teacher training


      3. Internet as a resource for homework


    Questions?

    Thank You


    Microsoft®


    © 2003 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.


    This presentation is for informational purposes only. Microsoft makes no warranties, express or implied, in this summary.


    Presentation to the Joint Committee on Communications, Marine and Natural Resources


    (ICT Sub Committee)


    5th June 2003


    Martin Murphy
    Una Halligan



    Overview of HP in Ireland


  • Over 4,000 employees in Ireland
  • Sales & Services Subsidiary, covering all Ireland
  • HP International Bank managing 3. 5Bn$ of assets, & HP’s finance arm in EMEA
  • DIMO - Dublin Inkjet Manufacturing Division, Dublin
  • EMEA CSSC (Customer Solution & Support Centre) for proliant & storage products, Dublin
  • European Software Development Centre, Galway

  • ROADBAND

    New Connections, the Government Action Plan on the Information Society, was launched in April 202.


    “It ambitiously sets out the Government’s Strategy to ensure that Ireland established itself as a world leading location for e-business and knowledge-based economic activity and that the benefits….are available to all Irish citizens”.


    “The objectives for Broadband infrastr ucture and services include: Making open-access affordable, always-on Broadband infrastructure and services for businesses and citizens available throughout the State, within three years. Broadband speeds of 5mbit/s to the home and substantially higher for business users as the minimum standard within ten to fifteen years”.


    Broadband Ireland Inc

    Competitive Advantage


    Enables effective E-government


    Empowers Citizens


    Level playing pitch for all Regions


    Promotes Partnership


    Benefits

    E-government


    Healthcare


    Education


    Social Value

    Bridge Digital Divide


    Promote e-inclusion


    HP - Citizenship



    Our Vision Philanthropy


    Using our IT expertise to deliver solutions that bridge the Digital Divide:


    We live up to our responsibility to society by being an economic, intellectual and social asset to each country and community in which we do business.


    HP bringing IT solutions to the Community in Ireland


    Gender Aspects of the National High Speed Broadband Infrastructure

    Presentation to the Oireachtas Joint Committee on Communications, Marine & Natural Resources, sub-committee on ICT.


    Sadhbh McCarthy


    Gender Strategy in Broadband deployment

    • Policy
    • Gender Considerations
    • Opportunities
    • The Road Map
    • Summary
      • Where we are
      • Where we can be

    Gender equality and ICT policy

    • ICT policy does not take up gender initiatives specifically
    • In the ICT sector, gender usually advanced as a a subset of disability and other marginalised groups
    • Gender strategy does not necessarily incorporate ICT focus.
    • Therefore among the gender & ICT groups, there is no consensus as to what are priority areas for action should be.
    • Convergence needed

    Gender Considerations

    • Access
    • Capacity & Skills
    • Equitable content (economic & social)
    • Public Sector provision of services

    Gender Considerations- Access

    • Technology costs hinder penetration to individuals and in some cases the community.
      • Cost of Entry (PC, Fixed Line installation, Sign-up Internet Costs)
      • On-going costs: with no realistic flat rate / always on cost, the potential for out of control costs inhibits the uptake for many households
      • Access issues are further exacerbated by the urban / rural divide where community based access (e.g. libraries) are also inaccessible.

    Gender Considerations- Capacity and Skills

    • Women in the home
    • Women with little knowledge of english,
    • Women with low levels of literacy and lack of access to technical education…….
    • All of these women are excluded from the knowledge network and knowledge economy
    • Meanwhile these women are further alienated from their Partners and Family who are gaining access and competencies through Work and School

    Gender Considerations - Economic & Social

    • Economic
      • Taking advantage of eCommerce savings (67% of ecommerce transactions are airline tickets)
      • Searching for a job on the internet, emailing your cv
      • Getting online training - CBT
      • Access to Consumers Rights and Issues
      • Online Banking
      • Technology competency as a tool for employment
        • Teleworking ……. Specific considerations
      • Social
        • Making an online hospital appointment
        • Helping your children understand the world around them
        • Virtual Networks for support for home carers and home makers
        • Communication with remote family members
      • Social and Economic Inclusion.

    Gender Considerations- Public Sector Policy

    • Provision of Services - Government should be leading by example
    • Policy Makers have not realised the full potential of ICTs in Gender Development
    • No enabling frameworks in place.
    • Current ICT models for Government delivered services, remain restricted to:
      • digitisation of available information
      • automation of existing manual processes
    • Fragmented initiatives - no cohesive strategy
    • Creative thinking and new approaches needed - community based

    Opportunities - Social & Economic Equality

    • With gender specific policy initiatives we can create an enabling environment which promotes :
      • Women’s Economic Empowerment through ICT (Full participation in the Knowledge Economy)
      • Women’s Social Empowerment through ICT (Enhancing access and capacity in the areas of health, education and basic social services)

    The Road Map....

    • The majority of the poor (in Ireland) as in other countries are women and they experience vulnerability and powerlessness to a much greater degree than men.
    • Equitable access to ICT and the capacity and skills to use that access are critical to many women
    • This access can and should be deployed through the broadband rollout
    • But… women need to be involved in decision making regarding the development of the new technologies in order to participate fully in their growth and impact.
    • As with many technology deployments, provision on access and content is key to initial demand. Follow through usage and content is driven up from the community and the individuals.
    • Summary - where we are...

    • The current broadband infrastructure deployment is to be welcomed (MANs, WLAN, VSaT etc.)
    • Without gender consideration of content and services, this will not be enough.
    • Without specific tactical (CAIT) and strategic (PSB, Reach) initiatives women in particular will remain on the wrong side of the digital divide.
    • However….. Ireland is technologically vibrant, committed to gender equality and uniquely positioned to deliver both the strategic and tactical programmes needed to deliver a fully inclusive knowledge society and economy.

    Summary - where we can be….

    • We have all the complexity without the scale…
      • We can emulate (Sweden, Korea, Canada) …. Followers
      • We can Innovate…. Leaders
        • We can set up prototype ICT models
        • Build Partnerships (NGOs, Public, Private)
        • Focus on research and innovation
        • Set the type of aggressive targets of penetration, access and usage that can be achieved with true convergence of infrastructure, content and service provision.
      • Securing an inclusive society and maintaining the competitive advantage of our ICT economy











    Axia Ireland Broadband Proposition

    How The Supernet Works


    Ireland’s Broadband Solution

    New Connections, the Government Action Plan on the Information Society, was launched in April 2002.


    “We wish to see Ireland within the top decile of OECD countries for broadband connectivity within three years.”


    “Axia's basic value proposition to government is:


    Ireland can have a ubiquitous broadband network for all public agencies and solve the rural service deficits for about the same annual cost they are already spending today!”


    Axia are implementing a similar solution for the Government of Alberta


    Who is Axia?

    • Canadian company, headquartered in Calgary, Alberta
    • Founded in 1995


      Toronto Stock Exchange listing


    • Partnered with Cisco and Microsoft to win the key role in implementing broadband solution for Alberta government.
    • Experts in helping customers perform better through IP technologies and services
    • Acknowledged leaders in their business area
    • Excellent revenue growth throughout history


    How The Alberta Supernet Works

    • SuperNet is an electronic grid of cable, telephone and wireless connections that will link 422 communities across Alberta.
    • Every school, library, health-care facility and government office will be tied into this high-speed broadband network
    • Private business/individuals will be able to "piggy-back" on to it
    • The grid can be separated into two main parts:
    • The base network will link the province's 27 major urban centres.


      The extended network links 395 more distant communities


    • Once the connections have been built, government offices, libraries, health-care facilities and schools across Alberta will be linked

    A six-megabit high-speed broadband connection can cost as much as $10,000 per month today - and service levels of this type are available only in major urban centres. By contrast, Alberta SuperNet will provide 20-megabit service to every government institution in the province for less than $700 per month.


    Services

    • Services allow any location to connect with any other location on the network and access the world wide web.
    • Transport includes “Class of Service” features which allow all convergence data types to be delivered, video, voice and data.
    • Network is monitored and controlled from a central source that allows real-time operations. This permits easy configurations and changes to be made.


    Alberta SuperNet


    4700 Service Locations


    427 Towns and Villages


    How The Supernet Works

    • Points of Presence and Meet-Me Facilities.
    • These are key junctions throughout the grid


      Private Internet Service Providers can link their local networks into the SuperNet, to take advantage of broadband access.


      This system creates a competitive marketplace where telephone and cable companies, and new suppliers, will have equal access to SuperNet - which means they'll want to offer services to their customers at competitive prices.


    • This is especially important for rural communities:
    • accessing these PoPs and Meet-Me Facilities means that ISPs won't be faced with the daunting and costly task of laying cable from outlying towns to the nearest major urban centre


      which will translate into reasonably priced Internet access across Alberta. (In fact, the SuperNet contract stipulates that rural and urban access rates will be equal.)


      Alberta’s Goals with SuperNet.

    • The SuperNet will eliminate the "digital divide" between metropolitan and non-metropolitan Alberta
    • Many business limitations of locating outside metropolitan Alberta will be eliminated.
    • In both their personal life and work life, residents will have the benefits of being globally connected without having to move to metropolitan Alberta.
    • The SuperNet will give Alberta residents first mover advantage.
    • Learning, healthcare, etc. will reach new performance levels with broadband online services

    Broadband

    • To lead the world in IP requires more than fast transport.
    • Leading IP applications “converge” all voice, video, data and graphic information into a single network format.
    • The use this network effectively requires that the entire network be controlled, monitored and operated from a single and uniform standpoint.
    • Alberta SuperNet uses this integrated approach.
    • All systems are based upon open standards which encourage participation and use.

    John Chambers Cisco CEO says an address about broadband;


    An important factor will be cooperation between a variety of agencies and the government, With high-powered bandwidth-hogging applications becoming more and more in demand (these include e-commerce, e-learning and supply chain management). Building the infrastructure from the top down will be crucial.


    "Remember- a half an hour of video is the equivalent of half a year of emails," says Chambers, stressing the need to be able to handle the heavy data, voice and video traffic demanded by today's consumers.


    But it isn't just transport that will be important. Studies have shown that enterprise CIOs want more than just a provider of transport- they want customized value-added services”



    Connecting Albertans to the World

    Arthur R. Price.


    Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


    Axia NetMedia Corporation


    • "By putting a third party - Axia - in the pivotal role, as opposed to a party that would have inherent conflicts with others within the traditional telecom sector, the Government of Alberta is able to ensure that universal access at competitive prices is available to Albertans on an ongoing basis.”
    • "We've created competition where the size of the market would not otherwise support competition. We've done this by ensuring open access and encouraging competition at every level of the technology delivery process, thus enabling the customer to be the decision-maker."

    Where does Ireland Stand?

    • Ireland Trails nearly every country in the OEDC list in terms of Internet availability
    • Leaders are:
    • Korea, Canada, Denmark, Belgium Sweden and USA
    • Trailers are: Ireland 29th behind Hungary, Czech Republic & Mexico

    OECD Org for Economic Cooperation & Development


    Ranking of Countries: Internet Users



    • Steps begun to address the broadband weakness
    • but slow movement means Ireland is actually losing ground.


    • Enterprise Ireland/Forfas/IDA have recognized that a solution to the problem is necessary, to maintain a dynamic economic growth in the future.
    • Ireland has already lost jobs and businesses because of the broadband infrastructure weakness.
    • Plans to diversify future development out of Dublin and Cork are dependent on adequate and affordable broadband in rural Ireland.

    Broadband

    • Most phone cos. say DSL is adequate.
    • This is because these services maximize their embedded investment.
    • All knowledable experts deny this conclusion but may argue how much faster is necessary.
    • Irish Government's own reports say 5 Megabit and above speeds are necessary for future.
    • However, some officials within government remain unconvinced.
    • Independent outside report commissioned by Forfas and presented to full Cabinet in 11/02 and 5/03 reaffirms high speeds

    New Connections, the Government Action Plan on the Information Society, was launched in April 2002.


    “It ambitiously sets out the Government’s strategy to ensure that Ireland establishes itself as a world leading location for e-business and knowledge-based economic activity, and that the benefits … are available to all Irish citizens.”


    “The objectives for broadband infrastructure and services include:


    Making open-access, affordable, always-on broadband infrastructure and services for businesses and citizens available throughout the State within three years. Broadband speeds of 5mbit/s to the home and substantially higher for business users as the minimum standard within 10-15 years.”


    Broadband Stagnation

    • Without an unexpected new competitive threat or direct Irish government intervention, neither Eircom nor ESat BT will willingly solve the Irish Broadband deficit
    • There are strong financial incentives to maintain the status quo “monopoly”.
    • The incumbents will avoid having to respond to the introduction of competition BUT WILL accommodate once put in place by government.

    What is the Challenge?

    • Ultra high-speed internet communications links are the economic infrastructure of the future
    • Ireland is lagging far behind the EU and the rest of the world in these key economic assets.
    • Nothing currently planned in the private sector is designed to improve Ireland's last place position
    • No Government in the EU has been successful in forcing telecoms to unwillingly install these services
    • Government must intervene if things are to change

    What is the Solution?

    • Governments has accepted the necessity to act
    • Implementing “New Connections”
    • Maximize private sector investment
    • Proposition
      • Develop the existing framework further


        Government as Enterprise Customer


        • Leverage Buying Power

      Adopt a similar strategy to that which is being successfully implementing by the Government of Alberta


    Methodology

    • Place the government in the “enterprise customer” role of aggregating its purchasing power across the entire marketplace
    • Use the enterprise customer to base load the nationwide IP network and provide the government with ubiquitous broadband IP network and high-speed local access
    • Align the commercial interests of a network operator with those of the enterprise customer
    • Significant Savings in Govt. Spending are Probable
    • By Server Consolidation


      Lower Telecommunications Costs


    • Network operator – non-conflicted party
    • creates and manages “last leg” to link non-competitive markets to competitive markets


      Establish Meet-Me facilities in competitive markets


      Create Points of Presence (PoPs) in non-competitive markets


    • Link with broadband IP network
    • – optical wherever possible, wireless where optical is not appropriate


    • Provide government with local access to network
    • In competitive markets – buy services from carriers to connect government premises to Meet-Me facilities


      In non-competitive markets – create (build) the network for local access to Points of Presence (PoPs)



    Final Observations

    • Axia believes that every community in Ireland with a school, hospital or government office can have affordable and available connections.
    • Axia will deliver a ultra high-speed connection to every town and village in Ireland


    • These connections are necessary regardless of where you live in Ireland
    • Axia’s connections allow communication with any other location in Ireland without additional change
    • Full Service Delivery - voice, video and data
    • The desirability and necessity of a modern, low cost and widely available digital electronic infrastructure for the efficient delivery of government services and for Ireland to fully benefit from participation in today’s and tomorrow’s global knowledge economy is supported by all thoughtful observers who do not have a vested interest in maintaining the status quo.
    • Axia is convinced that Ireland can have a state of the art, extremely high speed, nationwide, IP infrastructure to connect every government, public agency, school and health care facility regardless of where it is located in the country for less than these agencies are now spending on obsolete communications services today from incumbent suppliers.
    • This public sector IP network can be expanded to also meet the digital communications need of Irish businesses and citizens without continuing government subsidies, in a way encourages continuing competition and increases services diversity and availability as well as lowering costs. This is true again regardless of where they are located. Rural users have exactly the same services as Dublin locations.
    • Axia believes that if the government of Ireland implements the recommendations of the New Connections report using an innovative business model and provides multiple megabit services to all of Ireland, the government will spend less on funding its operations over the next five years than if it chooses to ignore this opportunity.
    • The key to success of this is to harness the creativity, power and innovation of the private sector to work with government to meet their policy objectives rather than having their objectives mutually opposed. The broadest segment of the private sector will be motivated by the government aggregating its buying power into a significant and comprehensive business opportunity.
    • Axia’s assertions can be objectively tested. All the government needs do is conduct a comprehensive, fair and open competitive tender for the best solution to these broadband services needs. Recent Government initiatives are a small but excellent first step but will not on their own meet the broadband challenges facing Ireland. Aggregation is the key.

    What Would it mean in Rural Ireland?

    • It means rural residents receive exactly the same benefits at exactly the same costs as urban citizens. No advantage for Dublin
    • It means new businesses can occur anywhere in Ireland at the same cost to developers
    • Rural residents will not be disadvantaged in receiving full government services such as education and health
    • Offering services to rural consumers and businesses is a new revenue opportunity for local entrepreneurs and organizations


    The Regional Business Opportunity

    • In Alberta, Axia is the direct service provider only for government, all other customers are served by independent businesses who connect to the Axia network
    • Low cost reliable access can be provided to anyone (including incumbents like Eircom) or any new entity who wishes to offer consumer and business connections
    • Every independent service provider is treated in exactly the same way, there are no advantages to the incumbent Telco's
    • Axia guarantees connection rates will not rise and may become much lower

    Joint Committee on Communications, Marine & Natural Resources

    ICT Sub-Committee

    Dan Flinter


    Chief Executive Officer


    Enterprise Ireland


    24th June 2002


    Enterprise Ireland Client Base


    Strategy


    Client Telecommunication Requirements


    Some Conclusions


    Agenda


    Development Agency focused on the particular needs of indigenous business


    Services include Commercialisation of Publicly Funded Research, Business Development and International Marketing


    10 offices in Ireland and 34 International locations


    Enterprise Ireland


    3,500 Client Companies


    Annual Turnover €24 Billion


    Exports €11 Billion


    Multiple Sectors


    Regionally dispersed


    Enterprise Ireland Client Companies






    Enterprise Ireland’s Strategy – linking these three key elements






    Essential for Researchers involved in International collaborations


    Fundamental toz normal business activities – all companies


    Critical to the development of new “high tech” sectors such as Digital Media


    Necessary for Regional Development


    Telecommunications Infrastructure


    “Always-on” Internet for basic eBusiness


    High-Tech Companies require access to higher Bandwidth Services


    Competitive costs


    installation & operational


    Guaranteed Service Levels


    lead times & technical support


    Regional availability


    EI Client requirements


    Dedicated eBusiness Unit


    Webworks - Regional High Tech Clusters


    Partners in National “MAN” Projects


    Digital Media Incubator in Digital Hub


    Commitment to availability of EI Services on-line


    Enterprise Ireland Initiatives


    Unbundling the “local loop” to enable wide availability of DSL


    NDP Initiatives to increase the availability of Fibre:


    Development of the National Broadband Backbone


    Increasing number of nodes providing access into the Backbone


    Development of local Broadband Networks linking into these nodes


    Possible use of Alternative Technologies in the regions


    Current EI Client Priorities


    Telecoms and Internet Federation

    Presentation to


    Joint Oireachtas Committee on
    Communications, Marine and Natural
    Resources


    ICT Sub-Committee


    Over 60 Member Companies


    Telecoms service providers, users, equipment manufacturers


    Affiliated to ICT Ireland within IBEC


    Has remit for IBEC Telecoms Policy


    Industry Groups including


    Regulatory, Wireless, Wired, Internet Service Providers, Hosted Services and Cable & Broadcasting


    The Irish Telecoms Industry

    14,700 employed - 3% of GDP


    Global Industry recovering from retrenchment


    Recent Positives in Irish Context


    DSL price halved - 3 competitors


    FRIACO introduced - Broadband ‘conditioner’


    3G network trials


    New entrants e.g. Wireless operators


    National routes - ESB and Aurora


    Ireland’s Telecoms Infrastructure

    Provides a critical business infrastructure


    Little or no subvention


    Despite license fees and regulatory charges


    Good Basic Infrastructure


    Fixed line has near universal coverage


    National mobile 2G/2.5G coverage


    Good connectivity both National and international


    Lack of platform competition to date


    Low implementation levels - upgraded cable, fixed wireless or competing technologies


    Perceived shortfall in broadband uptake





    Investment

    1997 - 2003


    € 5 Billion from industry


    Government spent less than 3 %


    Investment is ongoing


    800,000 lines enabled for DSL Service


    3G network Roll-out progressing


    Ongoing Investment is conditional on market factors


    Technology

    Gradual increase in utility as bandwidth increases


    NOT proportionate - 80/20 rule applies


    Mobile technologies trade ubiquity for bandwidth


    Competition based on:


    Services e.g. DSL on Fixed Network


    Platforms e.g. develop cable and wireless systems


    A Policy Choice must be made


    Service

    Dial-Up

    512 Kb

    5 Mb

    Internet Browsing

    x

    x

    x

    Simple E-mail

    x

    x

    x

    Commercial E-mail Teleworking

    x

    x

    Online Gaming

    x

    x

    Video Conferencing

    x

    x

    DVD quality video

    x

    Agendas

    Users


    Pricing / Services


    Operators


    Need for commercial returns


    Government


    “Ireland Inc” / FDI


    Regulator


    Ensure fair competition / service standards


    Provision of Broadband

    International challenges for Government in dealing with “freed offspring”


    Overarching Policy needed


    Joint Oireachtas sub-committee will help


    Regulatory Intervention is Complex


    Encouraging both competition and investment by incumbent


    Not always complementary !


    Government Intervention

    Co-operation with industry


    Engagement needs to be improved


    Proposed Levies not the way to proceed


    Relations need to be simplified


    Industry / Government / Regulator


    Users


    Within boundaries of Competition policy


    Broadband Deployment

    Need to align efforts and focus


    Telecoms Strategy Group


    Background


    Membership


    Forum for Dialogue


    Industry Bodies


    Government Departments


    Work programme


    Interim Report


    Market Development


    Full report


    Regulation in Ireland

    Should ensure fair competition…..


    while protecting Investment environment


    This will encourage effective and sustainable competition


    Services versus infrastructure based competition


    DCMNR


    ComReg


    Competition Authority


    Telecoms Regulation

    Optimum Regulatory Focus will include


    Promoting Competition


    Facilitating Investment


    Ensuring adequate margins at wholesale level


    Market Forces should set pricing


    Electronic communications directives


    Being transposed - due in July


    Regulation based on Competition law


    Platform Neutrality


    ComReg

    Near Term Industry concerns


    Cost of Regulation - operating surplus


    Decision making process/consultation procedures


    Lack of transparency/justification for decisions


    Use of Publicity


    Long term strategic issue with regulation


    Need to move to competition law


    Pricing of Broadband

    Innovative pricing


    Addressing needs/ability to pay


    Impeded by complex regulatory structures


    Services level segmentation required


    Success of Low fare airlines - analogy


    DSL - Progress


    Source: Norcontel, Broadband Telecommunications in Ireland – Benchmark Study, Update Report March 2003.


    Vision Needed

    Practical, realisable Government vision is required


    Clarity will be Essential


    Policy


    Investment Criteria


    Directions to Regulator


    Agreement needed


    not a zero-sum outcome



    Presentation to the Oireachtas Sub-Committee on Broadband

    Peter Evans


    David Taylor


    1st July 2003


    Summary of Presentation

    • Who are Esat BT ?
    • What has Esat BT done ?
    • Broadband ADSL Services
    • Roadblocks
    • What can Government do ?
    • What can Esat BT do ?
    • Questions and Discussion

    Who are Esat BT ?

    • We are a full service communications provider (Voice, Data, Internet, eBusiness, Solutions)
    • We serve all segments of the Irish Market throughout the 26 counties (and to the whole island in conjunction with BT Northern Ireland)
    • We employ 1000 full-time staff in offices in Dublin, Galway, Cork, Limerick and Waterford
    • We are the second largest fixed operator with approximately 10% share of the fixed market.
    • We are owned since 2000 by BT and are fully integrated into BT Global Services Division

    What has Esat BT done ?

    • We have invested over €600M in our Network in Ireland since 1997 (€60M in 2003)
    • We have been consistently first to market with innovative Internet services:
    • - Subscription services: Ireland On-Line, 1991


      - Free services: Oceanfree, 1998


      - Broadband Services: Esat BT ADSL, 2002


      - Bundled off-peak Internet minutes: Netsmart, 2002


      - FRIACO (Anytime) Service: IOL Anytime, 2003


    Esat BT brings National competition

    • We have brought competition, choice and innovation to Irish Consumers and Businesses - on a national basis
    • We use wholesale services from eircom where we do not have our own infrastructure.

    Alternative Delivery of Broadband Services

    • Corporate/MNC Market well served by fibre broadband
    • - Esat BT uses its own infrastructure


    • Small and medium companies and residential users can only realistically be supplied broadband by ADSL. ADSL uses the copper loop (final mile.)
    • - Esat BT is totally reliant on eircom providing wholesale services at the right price and right service level.


    Alternative Delivery of Broadband Services

    • Corporate/MNC Market well served by fibre broadband
    • - Esat BT uses its own infrastructure


    • Small and medium companies and residential users can only realistically be supplied broadband by ADSL. ADSL uses the copper loop (final mile.)
    • - Esat BT is totally reliant on eircom providing wholesale services at the right price and right service level.



    These 3 are inter-linked. Success only comes from low wholesale prices and high wholesale service levels.


    ADSL Services

    2 Wholesale Products are available to OLOs for DSL: Bitstream and Local Loop Unbundling



    Roadblocks

    • High wholesale prices.
      • - LLU charges under legal challenge. Eircom want €27 per month European average circa €12 per month.


        - Bitstream. Eircom charge €27 per month European average circa €20 per month.


    • Slow Progress in resolving wholesale service issues.

    Driving Awareness of Broadband

    • FRIACO is not broadband but will in itself drive Internet awareness, by bridging the Dial-Up and Broadband Gap

    Access Method

    FLAT RATE PRICING

    SPEED

    Dial Up (Metered)

    NO

    NO

    FRIACO (Anytime)

    YES

    NO

    ADSL Broadband

    YES

    YES

    • Broadband for Schools
    • - Current spend of €70 per week for 2 hours Narrowband (56K/64K) access. All paid to eircom.


      - Esat BT can deliver a combined Broadband/Anytime product for <€40 per month


    What can Government do ?

    • Assist with Demand Stimulation before build-out
    • - needs to become a customer rather than a supplier of broadband services


      - Broadband rings will extend the reach of fibre, but will not address the final mile - access issues at wholesale level still exist.


      - Price stimulation: e.g. Subsidies, Low VAT for broadband ?


    • Address Regulatory Issues to facilitate competition
    • - Clear Government mandate needed to ensure regulatory focus is placed on wholesale Broadband issues; price and service.


      - Greater urgency on the part of ComReg for LLU and Bitstream services.


    What can/will Esat do ?

    • We will build additional network
    • - roll out more fibre network and additional LLU, should the current pricing and unbundling process issues be resolved


    • We will work in Partnership with Government
    • - through PPP’s / Government Fibre ring programme / Schools / Health services / Northern Ireland etc.


    • We will continually drive down price points
    • - As our costs are driven down, we will pass these on to our customers but we cannot drive down eircom’s input wholesale prices - that is a matter for the regulator...


    • We will continue to develop new and innovative products
    • We will assist the awareness of Broadband and eServices through advertising, partnerships, events and sponsorship

    Thank You


    Questions ?



    Telecoms and Broadband


    Joint Oireachtas Committee on Communications, Marine and Natural Resources


    ICT Sub-Committee


    Dr. Phil Nolan, CEO


    David McRedmond, Commercial Director


    1st July 2003


    Agenda

    1. Industry Context


    2. eircom Today


    3. Broadband Ireland


    4. Call to Action


    Industry Context

    • Challenging time in Telecoms post-Downturn
    • Major challenge is attracting Capital


    • Share of Telephony Voice Market is 60% Mobile / 40% Fixed
    • No growth in Fixed Line Telco’s


    • Fixed Telecoms increasingly focused on Data
    • Data is significantly lower margin than Voice


      Networks, designed for short-duration voice, require investment


    eircom Today

    eircom is a commercial company driven by both customer and shareholder value


    • eircom is Ireland’s telecoms Infrastructure
    • €1billion invested over past 5 years and €1billion in next 5


      Other operators are largely re-sellers of eircom’s network


    • eircom is driving efficiency and value for Consumers
    • Workforce halved from 18,500 in 1985 to below 8,500 today


      Prices reduced from highest in Europe to cheapest quartile today


    • eircom is operating in a Competitive market
    • 60% of voice market is mobile


      Wholesale prices are at European average (including lowest Interconnect and lowest Flat-Rate)


      eircom is first country in Europe to introduce CPS, and operates in one of Europe’s most liberalised markets


    Reducing Cost Base

    eircom is delivering value by reducing its cost base



    • Headcount reduced by 23% in last 5 years
    • Headcount reduced by 1,700 employees since Valentia acquisition
    • No Industrial Action
    • eircom’s analysis shows operating cost per line below BT levels

    Improving Ireland’s Competitiveness

    Telecoms one of the cheapest products in Ireland despite high cost economy



    According to Forfás:


    “Ireland was the 2nd most expensive country in the EMU 12 for all consumer goods and services in 2002…”


    “By contrast, Ireland was found to be relatively cost competitive for communications.”


    Consumer Pricing Report, Forfás May 2003


    Real Prices Falling

    eircom Retail Price Movements v CPI – 1997 to 2003



    • eircom prices have reduced by 20% since 1997 (50% in real terms)
    • Prices will continue to be below inflation for next three years

    Average Residential Bill


    Average Business Bill


    Business Broadband (Leased Lines)


    Business Broadband (International Leased Lines)


    Broadband

    eircom is rapidly advancing the Government’s vision for Broadband Ireland


    • eircom has built a world-class backbone network
    • Most efficient and lowest-priced in Europe


      Excellent national coverage and International capacity


    • Meeting all the needs of Corporates investing in Ireland
    • Cheapest international connectivity and competitive leased lines


      Standards of service are ‘EU leading’ (ComReg)


    • Roll-out of mass-market Broadband well advanced
    • Over half of lines covered; on target for two-thirds by year end


    Supply is no longer the issue: Take-up is the Challenge…


    eircom exchanges already enabled for Broadband

    Represents over 50% of all lines


    Dublin Area: Beggarsbush, Blanchardstown, Ballyboden, Belcamp (Coolock), Bray, Cabra, Celdbridge, Clondalkin, Clontarf, Coolock, Crown Alley, Crumlin, Custom House, City West, Dolphins Barn, Dundrum, DunLaoghaire, Finglas, Greystones, Lucan/Ballydowd, Leixlip, Merrion Square, Malahide, North Main (north city centre), Nutley, Palmerston, Phibsboro, Priory Park (Stillorgan), Rathmines, Rochestown, Santry, Ship Street (city centre), Shankhill, Sandyford, Swords, Summerhill, Sutton, Tallaght, Terenure, Walkinstown, Whitehall, Dublin Airport.


    Outside Dublin: Arklow, Athy, Ballina, Ballinasloe, Ballincollig, Bandon, Carrick On Shannon, Castlebar, Castletroy, Churchfield (Cork), Dennehys Cross (Cork), Dooradoyle, Douglas, Drogheda, Dundalk, Ennis, Enniscorthy, Gorey, Killarney, Limerick (Roches St.), Listowel, Mallow, Mervue, Naas, New Ross, Portlaois, Quaker Rd (Cork city), Rathedmond, Roslevin (Athlone), Shannon, Shannon Airport, Shantalla (Galway city), Sligo, Tralee, Tuam, Waterford, Wellington Rd, Westport, Wexford, Wicklow,…


    eircom exchanges being enabled for Broadband

    Nationwide: Ashbourne, Athlone, Balbriggan, Chardavin (Limerick), Carlow, Cavan, Clane, Clonmel, Cobh, Cork central, Dunboyne, Dunshaughlin, Foxrock, Galway, Glanmire, Hettyfiel (Cork), Kilkenny, Kinsale, Letterkenny, Longford, Lucan, Macroom, Maynooth, Middleton, Monaghan, Mullingar, Navan, Nenagh, Newbridge, Newlands Cross, Newmarket, Portmarnock, Rathcoole, Rush, Skerries, Thurles, Trim, Tullamore, Tycor (Waterford),…


    Broadband Prices

    Price is one component to stimulate demand. eircom’s prices for Corporate broadband are extremely competitive, and mass-market prices represent value



    • Benchmarking of new products (e.g. Broadband) is notoriously unreliable, but…
    • eircom’s Broadband prices recently halved to competitive level
    • eircom provides Wholesale Broadband products allowing competition at retail level
    • Price is not an absolute - need to balance marketing, supply & demand, speed of rollout…and pricing is dynamic

    Call to Action

    Broadband take-up is everyone’s issue. eircom is delivering but more is required


    • Appropriate regulatory environment
    • Cost-driven regulation was appropriate in the past but regulation now needs to reward investment


      The network must never be priced below cost: it is too important and too valuable


    • Government should focus its telecoms resources on stimulating demand
    • Fiscal incentives e.g. tax breaks on Broadband or PC’s


      Faster rollout of e-government


    • Wider Broadband industry also has a job to do
    • Cheaper PC availability


      Promote and build content


      Market


    Cable’s role in the delivery of Broadband

    Presentation to Joint Oireachtas Committee on Communications, Marine & Natural Resources


    ICT Sub-Committee


    1 July 2003


    NTL Ireland - Background

    • Entered the Irish residential market in 1999 with the purchase of Cablelink
    • ntl Ireland’s main business is Multi-Channel Television
      • Circa 370,000 residential TV customers (50,000 digital customers)
      • 76% penetration in cabled areas
      • We are an Irish cable company - 550 employees in Ireland
      • Over the past 4 years we have invested considerably more money in Ireland than we have generated
    • Main competitor is Sky
      • UK focus - circa only 11 employees in Ireland (advertising sales)
      • Pays UK VAT @ 17.5%, not Irish VAT@ 21%
      • Never regulated in Ireland
      • Revenues returned to UK
      • Circa 275,000 digital customers in Ireland

    ntl’s Footprint in Ireland



    NTL Ireland & UK Network Map


    NTL in the UK

    • Largest cable company in the UK
    • 2 million TV customers
    • 2.4 million Telephone customers
    • 660,900 Broadband Internet customers
    • 436,300 Dial-Up Internet Customers

    All figures as at 31 March 2003


    Broadband – the UK Experience

    • NTL is the largest cable broadband provider in the UK
      • Launched Broadband in 2000
      • 12,500 customers after year one
      • 112,000 customers after year two
      • 550,000 customers after year three (end 2002)
    • Drivers of broadband take-up
      • Platform competition
      • price leadership
      • product leadership
      • network availability
      • product innovation

    UK: Competition between cable and DSL drives penetration


    UK Broadband Users at end May 2003


    Source: Oftel Internet and Broadband Brief June 2003


    NTL Ireland -Broadband

    West Dublin Experience


    • NTL launched Broadband to West Dublin in early 2002
    • Available to 23,000 homes in this area
      • 2,200 customers now availing of the service in this area
      • 9.5% Penetration achieved
      • 15% Penetration target for end 2003
    • Key findings:
      • no real understanding of ‘Broadband’
      • major sales effort required
      • customers are price sensitive

    Broadband Customer and Sales Feedback

    • Customer education major part of sales process
      • most consumers are unaware of the benefits of Broadband
    • Up-front costs a major barrier to entry
      • installation fees, cost of modem
    • Time on-line more than doubles when using Broadband
    • Key Selling Points:
      • Always-On
      • High Speed
      • Flat Rate monthly fee
      • No telephone line required

    Broadband -Fixed Line Market Review

    Provider

    Package

    Speed

    Price

    Modem

    Install Fee

    NTL

    Always-On 600

    600kbps

    €40

    provided

    €65

    Eircom

    i-stream starter

    512kbps

    €54.45

    €145.20

    €199.65

    EsatBT

    IOL Broadband

    512kbps

    €49.49

    provided

    €190

    UTV

    Click-Silver

    512kbps

    €47.50

    provided

    €99

    NTL’s Broadband Expansion Programme

    • NTL launched Broadband to 4,125 new homes in Lucan in May 2003
      • NTL is planning to launch to a further 6,000 homes in August
    • A total of 16,000 homes will be made available this year
    • NTL have access to over 400,000 homes
      • Potential for delivery of circa 140,000 Broadband homes in Dublin, Galway & Waterford by end 2004 (subject to internal Capital approval)
    • Will investigate (in Q4 2003) the potential for enabling the remainder of NTL’s network for Broadband

    Broadband Product Summary

    • NTL can offer real platform competition in the Irish market
    • Already leading the way on Price (€40)
    • …….. and on Product (600k Vs 512k)

    Regulatory Issues

    • Has regulation encouraged or hindered investment?
    • A mixed answer: on one hand regulation has facilitated market entry………..
    • …….but on the other it has removed scarce funds that might go towards broadband investment i.e. 3.5% cable licence fee
    • New Regulatory Framework should eliminate some of these distortions and lead to a better investment climate
    • Regulation in this sector cannot simply be about competition for competition’s sake but has to also stimulate investment and innovation i.e. sustainable competition
    • The key is creating incentives for investment: this will lead to infrastructure-based competition
    • Operators must be confident that they will be in a position to make a return on investment
    • Regulators must abandon their fixation on low prices because the corollary is low levels of investment
    • Regulation must redouble its focus on the creation of competing infrastructure and hard decisions need to be taken to support this

    Policy Environment

    • A need for greater public policy coherence
    • For example clear that National Spatial Strategy was not aligned with Regional Broadband Programme
    • Requirement that broadband infrastructure requirements are factored into local and national planning & development guidelines
    • Awarding Government VPN to eircom sent a negative signal to new entrants
    • One arm of Government trying to encourage competition while the other strengthens the position of the dominant incumbent
    • Measures that lead to closer co-ordination between industry and Government will improve situation
    • Telecom Strategy Group is a good first step but need for a permanent advisory and monitoring group

    Policy Principles

    • Government policies should foster innovation and competition between the entire range of broadband platforms – DSL, cable modems, satellite, 3G and fixed wireless - and reduce regulatory intervention with respect to broadband applications and services
    • Public policy should encourage new investment in broadband infrastructure and networks through a combination of public funding where there has been market failure, competition and the removal of regulatory uncertainty and disincentives, particularly planning disincentives
    • Broadband policy should encourage innovation and government should not pick technology winners and losers
    • ComReg should review and scale back any regulations that hinder widespread access to broadband services

    Policy Recommendations (1)

    • Impose ducting requirement on developers of new housing estates
    • Automatic ‘right-of-way’ for Broadband networks
    • Hands-off regulatory approach to new services
    • Greater focus on awareness raising and provision of public information
    • Joint Funding
    • MMDS licencing for Broadband

    Policy Recommendations (2)

    • Public sector and regional demand aggregation initiatives
    • New market-based approach approach to spectrum alloaction: prevent ‘spectrum hoarding’
    • Introduce a new Radio Spectrum Bill to amend current legislation which prevents spectrum trading
    • Will remove the current artificial scarcity of spectrum for valuable broadband applications
    • Will enhance innovation in the development of broadband products and services in Ireland and deliver enormous economic benefits
    • Investment incentives, potentially including targeted tax incentives for usage, should encourage broadband deployment to consumers and businesses

    Conclusions

    • UK experience is that inter-platform competition is the key driver of broadband take up, service innovation and price leadership
    • Cable has a vital role to play in bringing these benefits to the Irish market
    • Significant investment is required and will be driven by the commercial viability of the core cable television business

    CHORUS

    BROADBAND DELIVERY


    Technologies / Networks

    • Cable Modem
    • Fibre Networks
    • Fixed Wireless
    • Wireless Networks

    Cable Modem

    • Typical Delivery Speed
    • 512kb downstream


      128kb upstream


    Requires Upgraded Networks


    HFC 550 MHz +


    • Available on upgraded Networks
    • Kilkenny
    • Clonmel
    • Thurles
    • €50 per month flat rate
    • Chorus has about 40 Cable Networks passing 220,000 homes.
    • Most do not currently meet Specification to deliver broadband.


    Issues

    • Cost of upgrade to HFC 550MHz +
    • R.O.I
    • Combination TV/Data services
    • Standard Services
    • Regulatory Issues – Local Authorities
    • Cabling of new Estates
    • Link to Government Funded MANs in Cork, Limerick, Athlone etc., could reduce upgrade costs by up to two thirds

    Wireless Access

    • Fixed Wireless Access (FWA) Broadband 26 GHz
    • Fixed Wireless Access (FWA) Narrowband 3.5GHz
    • MMDS 2.5- 2.6 GHz



    Broadband FWA

    • 26GHz
    • Customer (CPE) equipment too expensive about 5k
    • Business Model has to be proved

    Narrowband FWA

    • 3.5 GHz
    • 36 Base Stations largely used for Telephony High Speed Data in Limerick, Nenagh Region – Keeper Hill.
    • 512kb downstream
    • 128kb upstream
    • Price €50 per month - residential

    MMDS

    • Widespread – passing 442,000 Homes
    • Traditionally used for Broadcast
    • Allowed 15% of Spectrum for forward path in 1999
    • Availability of Spectrum post 2005 – 3G
    • Use of Spectrum for return path- using cable modem
    • Need to have good Digital TV/Product to support broadband Network / Services
    • Low Cost ubiquity
    • Cable /Wireless can provide competition to DSL
    • Outside of Urban areas wireless may be only option

    Chorus Needs

    • Regulatory Equity and Certainty
    • Full co-operation from local Authorities – cabling of new estates planning requirement.
    • Synergy with Government funded networks
    • Return on Investment = profiling /matching of supply and demand

    Welcome

    Mobile Market

    Wireless Vs Wireline (Ireland)


    High data usage per user.


    Mobile Infrastructure Overview.

    • Here and now!
    • Three mobile network operators.


      2G (GSM) networks providing nationwide service.


      2.5G (GPRS) networks offering higher data speeds with new applications and services


      Mobile broadband technology - internet & email on the move


      Wireless LAN offering up to 11MB


      Extension of broadband access within licensed GSM spectrum - consultation underway


    • Next Step!
    • 3G licences awarded in July 2002.


    Consumer Data Service


    1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005


    Working with Business

    Mobile can and does…

    • Support the communication needs of staff in the field, reducing time and effort of relaying/accessing information to/from other persons in the field or Head Office.
    • Increase efficiency in work practices by replacing / complimenting existing processes and procedures by providing mobile connectivity.
    • Enhance existing services offered by Government Departments or to the public by using mobile based applications (voice / SMS / email / multimedia).
    • Deliver savings on the cost of providing public services.

    Mobile Toolkit

    • Suite of capabilities that a mobile operator can bring;


    The Consumer Market

    Mobile Market Summary.

    • High dependency on mobile networks for daily communication needs.
    • More people use mobile than fixed line networks; both number of lines, and number of minutes.
    • Large early adopter market segment.
    • High uptake of new products and services.

    Conclusion


    Conclusion

    • Mobile networks already support the daily communication needs of over 3 million people in Ireland.
    • Mobile applications enable organisations to communicate, transfer / access information while in the field, and improve how they deliver their core business activities.
    • When access to government services is provided over mobile the services will be more transparent, more accessible, more efficiently accessible and cost effective than other means. Overall this will be of benefit to the citizen and the Government as a whole.
    • Applications such as WLAN address Digital Divide

    Think Mobile!


    Q & A


    Thank you


    1 Primary school data based on 1,809 cases, as many schools did not report the number of classrooms.


    1 Bitstream access refers to the situation where the incumbent installs a high speed access link to the customer premises (e.g. by installing its preferred ADSL equipment and configuration in its local access network) and then makes this link available to third parties, to enable them to provide high speed services to customers. The incumbent may also provide transmission services to its competitors, to carry traffic to a higher level in the network hierarchy where new entrants may already have a broadband point of presence.