Committee Reports::Report No. 02 - Women in Management in Local Administration::01 May, 1996::Report

0. Report Structure

This report examines the question of gender balance in management in Local Administration. First, the background to the work is outlined. Second, the Joint Committee outlines its recommendations for attaining an appropriate gender balance within the management structure of Local Administration.


The researcher’s report to the Joint Committee is included to indicate the basis of the Joint Committee’s recommendations.


1. Introduction and Background to the Study

Background to the Preparation of the Consultants Study.


1.1.Joint Oireachtas Committees on Women’s Rights have undertaken many studies to highlight the obstacles to the equal participation of women and men in all aspects of Irish life. It is of some concern to this, the current Joint Committee, that, as yet, the management structure of Local Administration bodies do not reflect (a) the gender balance of society and (b) the number of women who work in these bodies.


It is from this perspective that the Joint Committee decided to study the level of women in management in Local Administration. It was concerned about why there were so few women at Senior management and what could be done to improve the situation.


This report represents the result of the research commissioned in this area.


Researcher’s Study

1.2.The complete results of the work done by the researcher presented to the Joint Committee is included in this report. The Joint Committee considers it to be a comprehensive and valuable examination of the issues involved in getting more women into senior management positions in Local Administration.


Joint Committee’s Recommendations

1.3.The Joint Committee lists its recommendations, which it feels are eminently practical. The Joint Committee wishes to emphasise the concrete nature of its recommendations and its intention to monitor their implementation.


Acknowledgements

1.4.The Joint Committee wishes to thank its researcher, Ms. Evelyn Mahon for her valuable input into its deliberations on this topic and her preparation of the annexed study.


2. Recommendations

In considering the results of the research the Joint Committee is conscious of the need to recruit management on the basis of the most eligible applicant irrespective of gender. The Joint Committee wished to promote the following recommendations:


Re. Local Appointments Commission:

2.1.The Local Appointments Commission should publish an annual report which includes the gender breakdown of all applicants and respective success rates. These should be related to each competition.


2.2.An information campaign should be launched by the Local Appointments Commission encouraging women to participate in competitions. Such a campaign should emphasise the gender neutral philosophy behind these competitions and bolster the confidence of potential applicants.


2.3.To facilitate the LAC each local authority should provide very clear job specifications for advertised posts and detail any qualifications which are mandatory as opposed to optional. In addition the personal skills and competencies necessary to carry out such a post should also be outlined in a way which enables any board member to evaluate applicants’ possession of such skills. Accurate descriptions would lead to more inclusive competition and ensure equity.


2.4.Interview boards should not proceed without a gender balance.


2.5.A comprehensive directory of available people who are available to sit on interview boards should be drawn up and updated regularly for internal use by LAC. This list should be used to ensure gender balance on interview boards.


2.6.In so far as possible, each candidate in the final interview stage should be given some indication of their performance in competitions.


2.7.Given the workload of the Commissioners, and the growing importance of equality, it might also be appropriate to extend the number of commissioners and to include a representative from the Department of Equality and Law Reform or from the Department of Enterprise and Employment on the Commission.


2.8.To ensure impartiality, Chairpersons of interview boards should be selected from diverse occupational background, age and gender.


On competitions held at Local Authority Level:

2.9.A common interview content, a uniform approach and procedures such as that used by the Local Appointments Commission is desirable. Staff who sit on interview boards should be trained in interview techniques and personnel staff should have special training to ensure equitable approach and treatment. This policy should be monitored by the Department of the Environment.


2.10.This report forms a base line audit of the position of women in management in Local Authorities. It showed considerable variation between Authorities. This variation must be addressed by the introduction of active equality policies in all Local Authorities. The responsibility for this policy should rest with the City/County Managers, operating under guidelines to be issued by the Department of the Environment.


2.11.Such equality policies must be continuously monitored and their effectiveness reviewed as is presently done in the Civil Service. To facilitate this, each Local Authority should include a chapter in its annual report giving a gender breakdown of applicants for each competition and their respective success rates.


2.12.Each Local Authority should provide very clear job specifications for advertised posts and detail any qualifications which are mandatory as opposed to optional. In addition, the personal skills and competencies necessary to carry out such a post should be outlined in a way which enables any applicant to assess their possession of such skills. Accurate descriptions would lead to more inclusive competitions and ensure equity.


2.13.Formal criteria for the selection of candidates must be supplied and each candidate treated in a fair and equitable manner.


2.14.Interview boards should not proceed without a gender balance.


2.15.The same criteria suggested for the LAC in establishing interview boards should be applied at Local Authority Level. Consideration should be given to establishing a base of interviewer from all Local Authorities. This would widen the potential for gender balance on boards.


2.16.In so far as possible each candidate in the final interview stage should be given some indication of their performance in competitions.


2.17.It is regrettable that interview selection which is not considered the optimum form of selection process by many personnel theorists and by half the staff surveyed is still the only dominant form of competition. The possibility of using other forms of competitive selection appropriate to particular posts and similar to those used in some parts of the private sector should be considered.


2.18.Greater team management within the organisation should be promoted. This would improve organisational morale by giving employees better access to information on the Local Authority as a whole and by promoting the personal development of all staff.


2.19.Information on training and development courses should be made widely available to staff in all areas and participation actively encouraged by personnel departments.


2.20.Senior management in Local Authorities should be made aware that career development and job commitment are of equal importance to both sexes notwithstanding the perceived traditional roles of men and women. Responsibility for this should rest with the Department of the Environment.


Women in Management in Local Administration


Report submitted to the Joint Committee on Women’s Rights


By


Evelyn Mahon & Lucy Dillon


Department of Sociology


Trinity College


Dublin


April 1996


Acknowledgements

Many people contributed in different ways to this study. I would like to thank the Joint Oireachtas Committee on Women’s Rights for funding the study. I am also extremely grateful to former Chairwomen of the Committee Monica Barnes, and Theresa Ahearn and members of the previous two Committees for their support of the study. I would like to especially thank Chairwoman Mary Wallace and members of the present Committee for their perceptive comments on an earlier draft of this report.


I would like to express my gratitude to Una Connolly, former Clerk when the study was initiated, Pat Timmins, present Clerk to the Committee, and Mairead McCabe of the Secretariat for their help at different stages of the project.


I am also indebted to Frank Sheedy formerly of the Local Appointments Commission and Beryl Ryan of Dublin Corporation who as Personnel staff initially helped me to fully understand recruitment and promotion in Local Authorities. Special thanks are due to Teresa Whitaker, Shane O’Donohoe and Nicola Byrne who all worked on the project at different stages and to Lucy Dillon, co-author of the report, who worked full time on the project for the last six months.


The aim of the study was to get an overview of the position of Women in Management in Local Authorities and to make a contribution to equal opportunity policy for the benefit of women and men in the future. To an extent then this study might be considered a base line, one against which gendered differences in the future can be compared. Such a study depends on the good will and support of those who participated in the study. So my greatest debt is to all those with whom I conducted interviews as they spoke honestly about their working lives, and their experiences on interview boards and to all those men and women who completed and returned the postal questionnaire. I hope that we have accurately represented their views and that you will find the report interesting and informative.


Women in Management in Local Administration

Report to Joint Committee on Women’s Rights April 1996

Introduction

This research was commissioned by the Committee on Women’s Rights to investigate the position of Women in Management in Local Administration. This report is based on a study designed to depict and explain the absence of women from top posts, to investigate the extent to which there are improvements in the gender composition of middle management and to make recommendations to ensure equal opportunities for all staff including women in the future.


The research presented here is based on (1) qualitative in-depth interviews with Local Authority staff at all levels drawn from urban and rural councils and corporations and interviews with those who served on interview boards; (2) on gender audits of staff by grade collected from Local Authorities; (3) a gender breakdown of competitions for posts organised by the Local Appointments Commission and from Local Authorities and, (4) on data collected from a survey of Local Authority staff using postal questionnaires.


Chapter One depicts investigate the absence of women from the most senior posts. While Chapter Two outlines the recruitment procedures to these posts which are the responsibility of the Local Appointments Commission. This chapter includes all the data for management competitions taken place between 1992 and 1994.


Chapter Three examines the representation of women in middle management. While Chapter Four reviews the competitions and representation of women in them. Women have to reach middle management positions in their Local Authorities in order to become eligible candidates for the top positions. It transpires that there is a low representation of women in middle management, though this varies between Local Authorities.


Chapter Five depicts the representation of women in the supervisory posts of Senior Staff Officer and Staff Officer. As might be expected there is a better representation of women in these posts but they are supervisory rather than managerial ones. The competitive interview is used to select candidates for these posts and the competitions held between 1992 and 1995 are reviewed.


Chapter Six analyses the postal survey data to see whether any key differences between men and women exist, and if differences emerge in terms of personal characteristics in career orientation and self efficacy.


Chapter Seven draws together all the conclusions from in-depth interviews, competition audits and the postal survey and makes recommendations for future equal opportunity policy.


Chapter 1 Gender Distribution in Top Managment

All Men at The Top

Table 1 shows that there are no women in the most senior grades of City and County Managers and Assistant City and County Managers. At the next level there are only two women County Secretaries and one woman Finance Officer. The three of these were appointed in 1994.


TABLE 1:1


Distribution of Women and Men in Senior Administrative Grades 1995


POSITION

TOTAL

MALE

FEMALE

Co.\City Manager

33

33 (100%)

0

Assistant Co.\City Manager

27

27 (100%)

0

County Secretary

26

24 (92.3%)

2 (7.7%)

Finance Officer

27

26 (96.3%)

1 (3.7%)

Senior Administrative Officer

23

22 (95.7%)

1 (4.3%)

Administrative Officer

156

134 (85.9%)

22 (14.1%)

Principal Officer

7

7 (100%)

0

Assistant Principal Officer

15

14 (93.3%)

1 (6.7%)

Senior Staff Officer

282

214 (75.9%)

68 (24.1%)

Staff Officer

423

215 (50.8%)

208 (49.2%)

TOTAL

1019

716


(70.3%)

303


(29.7%)

Gender Distribution in Management by County


(See appendix 2 for classification by gender)


Table 1:2 GENDER DISTRIBUTION WITHIN TOTAL STAFF IN LEVELS: SENIOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, PRINCIPAL OFFICER, ASST. PRINCIPAL OFFICER, SENIOR STAFF OFFICER & STAFF OFFICER*

COUNTY

MALE

FEMALE

CAVAN

6 (75%)

2 (25%)

CARLOW

7 (100%)

0 (0%)

CORK COUNTY COUNCIL

38 (76%)

12 (24%)

CORK CORPORATION

17 (60.7%)

11 (39.3%)

CLARE

8 (66.67%)

4 (33.33%)

DONEGAL

15 (88.24%)

2 (11.76%)

DROGHEDA

3 (75%)

1 (25%)

DUBLIN

156 (64.5%)

86 (35.5%)

DUNDALK

2 (50%)

2 (50%)

DUNLAOIRE\RATHDOWN

41 (53.9%)

35 (46.1%)

FINGAL

51 (68%)

24 (32%)

GALWAY CORPORATION

6 (75%)

2 (25%)

GALWAY CO. COUNCIL

10 (47.6%)

11 (52.4%)

KERRY

15 (83.3%)

3 (16.7%)

KILDARE

8 (57.14%)

6 (42.86%)

KILKENNY

7 (87.5%)

1 (12.5%)

LAOIS

7 (63.65%)

4 (36.35%)

LEITRIM

4 (44.44%)

5 (55.56%)

LIMERICK CO. COUNCIL

13 (72.22%)

5 (27.78%)

LIMERICK CORP.

8 (44.44%)

10 (55.56%)

LONGFORD

5 (83.33%)

1 (16.67%)

LOUTH

5 (55.56%)

4 (44.44%)

MEATH

10 (71.4%)

4 (28.6%)

MAYO

12 (80%)

3 (20%)

MONAGHAN

5 (55.56%)

4 (44.44%)

OFFALY

5 (83.33%)

1 (16.67%)

ROSCOMMON

9 (69.23%)

4 (30.77%)

SLIGO

7 (70%)

3 (30%)

SOUTH DUBLIN

41 (53.9%)

35 (46.1%)

TIPPERARY NR

5 (41.7%)

7 (58.3%)

TIPPERARY SR

14 (77.78%)

4 (22.22%)

WATERFORD CO.COUNCIL

11 (91.67%)

1 (8.33%)

WATERFORD CORP.

9 (81.81%)

2 (18.18%)

WEXFORD

10 (62.5%)

6 (37.5%)

WESTMEATH

12 (100%)

0 (0%)

WICKLOW

13 (81.25%)

3 (18.75%)

TOTAL

595 (65.9%)

308 (34.1%)

Getting To The Top: An Organisational Career.

Getting to the top position in any hierarchy is usually the apex of an individual’s career. Within any organisation professional and job-related qualifications and a series of successive promotions are required in order to gain access to the most senior positions. Successive promotions to hierarchically ordered positions are important. ‘Property in positions’, as such promotions may be called, may be regarded as a resource independent of property in skills and credentials, not least because access to positions does not depend on formal credentials alone. This is especially true of organisations such as Local Authorities which have bureaucratic structures, and a hierarchical organisational structure like a pyramid.


Women, it has been argued are at a disadvantage in procuring ‘property of position’ and the result is that men tend to dominate such hierarchies. Further it has been argued that the extent to which getting to the top of one’s career is dependent on formal qualifications rather than ‘property in position’ the more successful women are likely to be. In seeking to explain the gendered nature of top management positions in Local Authorities one must first establish the promotional routes to success. Having outlined the processes and practices one can then examine possible causes of the gender imbalance.


Collins writing in (1979) on career in Local Authorities said, “The overriding fact is that an organisational career is made in a political environment, and success goes to those individuals who recognise that fact and act on it most assiduously. The one who makes it to the top is the organisational politician, concerned above all with informal ties, maneuvering toward the crucial gate keepers, avoiding the organisational contingencies that trap the less wary”(1979 :31).


County and City Managers

Chubb (1974) in his assessment of 24 City and County managers in office described them as “men of considerable ability and varied experience at the height of their powers”. He showed that managers had varied backgrounds, qualifications and careers. McKinsey and Co. in 1971 however, called for change to ‘broaden the road to top management posts’ claiming that ‘local authority work’ is not attracting people of a sufficiently high calibre for either management or technical jobs. They recommended that Local Authorities should be able to appoint people from outside the service ‘to fill any post from clerical officer to County Manager’.


Profile of City and County Managers

Previous research gives us a good profile of the composition of men in these senior positions. The average age at the time of appointment has been in the mid-forties. Until 1994 City and County Manager posts were permanent ones and there was little movement out of management before the compulsory retirement age of 65. Between 1960 and 1982, there were only 51 City and County Management appointments. Between 1993 and 1994 there were 13 competitions for City/County Managers and Assistant City/County Managers.


Recent changes especially in new urban centres have brought about some expansion especially in the Dublin area. However, there is still only a total of 33 City or County Managers in 1995. There has been a growth in the number at the next grade, that of Assistant County Manager, who now number 27. There are no women in either grade.


Work Experience

A study of the 30 incumbents in 1987 showed that 24 out of the 30 had no significant work experience prior to joining Local Government. Of the remainder, one had previous experience in accountancy, two in engineering, and three in the Civil Service. This practice has remained the same until recently when a small number of top appointments went to men “outside’ the service including one who came from the private sector. These were noted as the exception rather than the rule, and even in the latter case he had some local government experience early in his career.


Educational Qualifications

There are no formally specified qualifications such as degrees for these top two positions. In the 1987 study for instance 4 out of the 30 incumbents had secondary education only while another four had degrees or diplomas before entering Local Government. However, 22 of these men had acquired diplomas or degrees while working through part time study. By a process of in-service training they acquired degrees in accountancy or public administration. Those recently appointed were more likely to have degrees, but they are still the exceptions. The postal survey responses show that the majority of the overall sample were recruited with Leaving Certificate (84%). Only 7% had a degree at time of recruitment and 7% a postgraduate degree.


Typical Career Routes

The majority of top managers in the past entered as Clerical Officers: 82% of those in office in 1979, 80% of those in 1987. Prior to that there was a greater degree of openness to competition with only 60% of managers in 1966 having entered at Clerical Officer level. Over time it appears that certain experiences, largely defined as ‘administration in Local Government’, have been viewed as central to the job. While recruitment for these top positions is open competition selection practices in the past have favoured internal candidates. Top managers have been largely drawn from the internal Local Authorities labour market. The postal survey returns confirm the importance of this internal labour market with a majority beginning their career at the Clerical Officer grade.


The Internal Labour Market of Local Authorities

The Devlin Report put a high value on the peripatetic nature of a local government career describing it as one which “has an impressive system of staff mobility”. Collins noted that ‘among the current managers an average of four separate changes of authority had been made on their way to their managerial post usually necessitating moving house with all attendant inconvenience and costs’. An analysis of the 30 incumbents in 1987 showed that only two served the same county throughout their Local Government career. The rest served an average of 5 different counties.


Of the 13 County Managers who responded in the postal questionnaire, the majority had moved Local Authorities more than four times, two respondents having moved 8 times. They had also moved house three or more times because of promotion. A quarter of respondents had moved house seven times.


It was speculated that the Local Appointments Commission gave a heavy weighting to length and variety of experience. This Garvin (1963) argued may ensure safe selection but prevented the infusion of new blood. Among the administrative experiences most highly valued by managers is the position of Town Clerk. Fifteen of the 30 incumbents in 1987 had been Town Clerks. The latter post like all Local Appointments was the responsibility of the Local Appointments Commission. The interview for the post of Town Clerk was seen as a tough one. The salary was low and the assignment seen as an isolated position with a lot of responsibility, presumably a good managerial training experience. Geographical mobility was a mandatory early step for would be Managers.


Viewed in terms of career development, the post of Town Clerk was a position in which incumbents gained confidence, decision making and managerial expertise. The status of the post varied according to town size so that men often moved from a Town Clerk position in one town to the same position in a bigger town. The following case study based on an interview conducted for this research shows a not uncommon peripatetic career route.


Case Study A and His Career Route to Date (now a Manager)

Move 1 : Recruitment:


Joined as CO in 1965 in provincial town


Did correspondence course Accountancy and Secretarial ACIS


Move 2 horizontal move:A few months after appointment moved to another town as CO


Move 3 (education) :After one year as CO got Study scholarship for a year to IPA


Move 4/promotion : Following year Town Clerk in small UDC


Move 5/promotion Three years later Town Clerk in bigger town


Move 6/promotion Four years later AO in larger town(called B) (AO new posts in 1976)


Move 7/promotion :Four years later Finance Officer in CO.Council


Move 8/promotion :Two years later Town Clerk in town B; /also got Co.Sec in another County;


Move 9/promotion: Seven years later move to Asst. Manager in city;


Move 10/promotion : Less than a year later he moved back to city B in Asst. Co. Manager post


Move 11/promotion : Last move to City Manager two years later now aged 47.


Interestingly all these competitions were conducted through the Local Appointments Commission except move 6 which was held by a Local Authority.


While the above profile is of a recent appointment, it seems fairly typical of the career routes of appointees to those posts in the past, since the internal labour market route became important. In many organisations the importance of internal labour market routes grows as the organisation expands. Those already in charge of the organisation favour the recruitment of types similar to themselves and the promotion of their own staff. In many ways this strengthens their power and control within the organisation. In addition, they are familiar with the way the organisation works.


Two recent appointments to posts at the level of Assistant County Manager can be seen as ‘outside ‘appointments. However, their career profiles are still very intertwined with the Local Authority structures, as the following career trajectories show.


Case B

Move 1 : recruitment after school to : E.O. ( Dept. of Environment);


4-5 years as EO but one of this on paid study leave to get a degree;


Move 2 : promotion to A.O ( through open competition/Dept. of Finance); continued to study economics, got study leave fellowship..


Move 3: to ESRI on fellowship;


Move 4: got AP in Environment while on fellowship


Move 5: after 5 years as AP went into private sector for 7 years; on key Commissions etc. relevant research background etc.


Move 6: open competition to present job at Asst. level


Case C.

Move 1: recruitment Adult Executive Officer( Dept. of Environment) half way through studying for a degree finished degree by night


Move 2: five years later promoted to Higher Executive Officer ( confined internal interview);


Move 3: promotion nine years later to Assistant Principal in Dept. (seniority);


Move 4: secunded to semi-state sector for couple of years


Move 5: to present job


While both of these successful candidates are considered ‘outside’ appointments they both worked in the Department of the Environment which is the Civil Service department responsible for Local Authorities. This experience was deemed comparable to Local Authority experience.


Keen Competition for Top Posts

Top positions are few, so competition between candidates is likely to be tough. A strong career orientation early in one’s working life is necessary. Extra ‘relevant’ qualifications might be an advantage, but qualifiactions are not mandatory so experience and a proven record of achievement in the job are more important. Scholarships or fellowships bestow special status on applicants, experience gained in special assignments is a valuable asset, a variety of job assignments which allowed a candidate great development scope are all significant in separating what might be called the “best “from the rest. To a certain extent, the agenda they pursue in the jobs and their achievements are self-initiated. Some leadership qualities are desirable for candidates. The ability to get things done, to accomplish things is crucial according to those who sat on interview boards.


Educational Qualifications and Promotion

The interaction between educational qualifications and promotion is difficult to assess. There are at present, I surmise, two competing views among senior management. One which emphasises the importance of education especially university education while the second which is somewhat sceptical of that view, preferring the long in-service career in Local Government. Those who espouse the first view may be more likely to favour the appointment of outsiders while the second will favour insiders.


Senior management is not seen as a professionalised area to which professionally trained managers apply, it is the apex of an organisational career. The following quotes by senior managers on the importance of education generally illustrates this diversity of opinion.


“Degrees are important for a number of reasons, one is discipline and commitment, it indicates an approach you have. Reasonable credit is given to those with degrees, more so for doing them than for their content.”


“Applications of qualifications to the job is what is important, not the degree or qualifications per se”


“You do seem to get some people who spend all their time getting qualifications and lack the capacity to apply anything”.


“There is a huge pool of people out there who have been to university, have worked in the private sector, we should be bringing these people in at all levels of the organisations”.


Interviews with members of interview boards revealed that in-service experience still takes precedence over external qualifications. The majority of staff were recruited as Clerical Officers with Leaving Certificate qualifications which is confirmed by the survey returns, but they also show that women were more likely to be recruited as Clerical Assistants\ Typists than men, 21.2% of women compared to only 1.2% of men. This further emphasises the prevalence of in-service experience over external qualifications


Promotional Procedures

All promotions in Local Authorities are made on the basis of competitive interview. The Local Appointments Commission (LAC) manage those for the following grades: City and County Managers, Assistant City and County Managers and those of Finance Officers and County Secretaries. Each Local Authority is now responsible for their own recruitment and promotion for posts below those appointed by LAC. In the next section. I will outline Irish Local Government’s responsibility for the recruitment and selection of staff, with a focus on the Local Appointments Commission.


Chapter 2 Recruitment and Selection

The Operation of The Local Appointments Commission in Relation to Senior Administrative Posts in Local Authorities.

In this chapter we are primarily concerned with appointments to the chief positions of Finance Officer, County Secretary, Assistant City Managers, County Managers and Town Clerks which are filled in most cases by the Local Appointments Commission. But first, I will review this recruitment and selection process used by the Local Appointments Commission.


Irish Local Government

The Irish Local Government system follows the English pattern in its origin and in much of its general structure, law and language. It has however, according to Bannon (1991), two characteristics of its own a system of City and County Management and the Local Appointments Commission (Roche:1982:10). The enactment of the Cork City Management Act in 1929 brought the administration of services under one individual who answers to the council but who has a statutory position and powers. The Manager is directly appointed following an open competition for the position conducted by an independent agency called the Local Appointments Commission.


The Local Authorities have two functions labelled ‘reserved’ and ‘executive’. The reserved functions are those performed by the elected representatives: decisions on major matters of policy and principle including the adoption of annual estimates, borrowing of money, and managing of development plans. ‘Executive’ ones include the employment of staff, acceptance of tenders, management of Local Authority properties, the collection of rates and day to day administration. Over time there has been a professionalisation of the delivery of services to the community at large.


Staffing

Direct ministerial control is exercised over staffing numbers and recruitment procedures. Issues of concern to staff are negotiated at central level through the Local Government Staff Negotiations Board (LGSNB) to which the councils’ staff unions bring their claims etc. While managers views are represented, issues relating to pay and conditions of service are effectively determined at a central level and the decisions reached centrally apply equally to each Authority1.


The Local Appointments Commission

The Local Authorities (Officers and Employees) Act 1926 established the Local Appointments Commission (LAC) as a separate recruitment agency. The purpose of the Act was to provide a system of open competitive appointments to Local Authority offices. The Local Appointments Commission is independent of the Authorities concerned. The Act provides for the appointment of three Commissioners by the Executive Council of Local Authorities. Since 1932 the office of Chairman of the Commissioners has been filled by the holder of the office of Ceann Comhairle of the Dail. Since 1959 the offices of the other two Commissioners have been filled by the Secretaries of the Departments of the Environment (formerly Local Government) and Health. The 1926 Act also specifies a Local Authority “council of a country, country borough, borough urban or rural district .. town commissioners”. These bodies now include the Vocational Education Committees, and the Health Boards, larger Harbour Authorities and Fisheries Boards (Sheedy 1994).


Changes Over Time in Remit of the LAC

Over time, as Local Authorities assumed a greater role in the selection of their staff the role of the LAC was reduced. The Act specifically covers the selection of Chief Executive Officers; Professional Posts and Other Offices and Employments. The Chief Executive office under every Local Authority was designated to be filled by the LAC i.e. County and City Managers etc. Initially this term included minor posts such as Town Clerks of small towns. The present position is that the post of Town Clerk of an urban District Council with a population in excess of 9,000 is filled by the LAC. All offices/positions (except teachers) which were in-part professional or technical in nature were automatically included in the original act. They included engineers, planners architects, all of whom are appointed by the Local Appointments.


In 1970, the Minister for Health was determined that some appointments to professional posts should continue to be made under the Act, while others such as consultant posts could be appointed by Hospital Authorities. Over time, nurses and midwives, part time professional posts and general practitioners posts were removed from Local Appointments Commission. Only the posts of Matron and Assistant Matron continue to be filled by Local Appointments Commission.


Exemptions Under Section 5

In terms of ‘other offices’ under the Act the Minister could decide to which of the offices the Act would apply. At present it is applied to mainly senior posts (above grade 7) in the administrative category (e.g County Secretary) and in certain specialised functions (e.g Librarian, Accountant and Finance Officer). Assistant County Managers are also filled through LAC. Within the Health Boards only the Chief Executive Officer and Programme Managers are appointed under the LAC.


Section 5.1 of the original Act allows Local Authorities to make appointments to posts (except those of City and County Manager) under special conditions and with Ministerial sanction. Three conditions must be met before the provision can be employed:(1) the appointment is made within three months of it becoming vacant; (2) the appointee holds a pensionable job under the Authority (or another Authority) (3) the latter office related to similar matters as the vacant one. This is to cope with special cases where there is a splitting of a Local Authority into two or an amalgamation of two Authorities. When County Dublin was divided into three administrative areas extensive use was made of section 5.


In addition, the Acts no longer apply to positions which are created on a temporary basis. Further, Local Authorities can be empowered (with ministerial consent) to fill posts to which the Acts apply in a temporary capacity, for an unspecified period. In Dublin County Council (established in January 1994), which have posts above those of grade 7 but below Assistant Manager level, these posts can be filled from eligible officers serving with these bodies by the Board themselves. ( The legitimation for doing so is said to derive from their staff numbers which are similar to those of some Civil Service departments).


This review shows the tendency over time to reduce the role of the Local Appointments Commission as the Local Authorities or Health Boards themselves assume a greater role in staff appointments. From interviews conducted to date, many of those at present in senior posts would have been promoted over time by the Local Appointments Commission. They are a national agency and as such maintain a national profile of staff. Appointments in Local Authorities and Heath Boards are the responsibility of the Chief Executive officer and their personnel staff.


Recruitment and Selection Procedures : The Professional Approach

Recruitment and Selection procedures are part of women/ manpower management. According to Gunnigle and Flood (1991:65) it comprises manpower planning, job analysis, recruitment, selection, induction and follow up. The entire process should be a continuous and coherent one. The assessment features of this task are central to the effort to achieve a ‘dynamic matching’ of the individual and the organisation, to the achieving of a strategic ‘fit’. Such an assessment includes: job analysis, recruitment which involves attracting a group of potentially employable candidates to apply for the vacancy identified and selection which is the process of ‘choosing from that group the right employees to fill the vacancy” (Gunnigle and Flood :1991:65).


Job Analysis and Selection Processes

Job analysis is an essential part of the Recruitment and Selection process. In personnel selection there is a focus on the job content derived from job specification and the corresponding behavioural and personal requirements of those considered suitable for appointment to those jobs. Sheedy (1994) outlined the steps necessary to the job analysis phase: job content must be described in term of goals and requirements, criteria which correspond to tasks and behavioural attributes which must be specified, predictors of both must be identified and predictor instruments must be obtained. The outcomes of this process are:


(1) a job description which is a statement of the purpose scope and duties of the job;


(2) a job specification which gives detailed information on knowledge and skills required to carry out the job;


(3) a description of the type of person required including qualifications, aptitudes etc, and


(4) a statement of the terms and conditions of employment associated with the job.


The above steps are very important ones in personnel selection procedures. The next stage is the recruitment phase.


Recruitment of Candidates

At the recruitment phase one has to ‘resource’ or attract candidates either through internal or external labour markets. Internal sourcing comes from transfers, demotion and promotion of existing staff. External options are through advertisements, informal networks, manpower or recruitment agencies.


Selection : Interviews

Interviews remain the most widely used selection tool and is used by Local Appointments Commission and Local Authorities generally. There are differences among respondents and in research literature on what constitutes a good interviewer and whether the qualities required are innate or can be acquired. Obviously those who subscribe to the latter support training in interviewing skills for those on interview boards.


References

References either written or verbal (the latter typically by phone) are a widely used selection tool. However, most research shows that typically references are requiredafter the job offer has ben made and not before. The latter is the procedure used by Local Appointments Commission.


Job Specification

The process begins with a request from the Local Authority to organise a competition for the job specified. This sets in motion a series of steps leading to the filling of the post. In the case of a County Manager this post can generally be filled within 8-10 weeks from the receipt of a statutory request from the employing Authority. Ideally the LAC in the first instance is provided with a job specification or the general particulars of the post. Apparently this is not always forthcoming nor as comprehensive as they would like it to be. To assist employers in this regard LAC has a set of Notes for Guidance of Persons Completing the Job Specification Information Form. This is very comprehensive. This procedure is in keeping with informed personnel practice.


The Local Appointments Commission is essentially a recruitment agency so it cannot prescribe a job description, yet effective and fair recruitment procedures are based on comprehensive job descriptions. The Commissioners initiated the preparation of a formal Job specification for certain posts but it is felt that this process needs further development to ensure that there is a comprehensive profile of the post.


The Local Appointments Commission has a remit for open competition and equal opportunity. Vacancies are advertised in the National press and professional publications. Applicants are supplied with a job description and details of the post. This also contains the following reference; ‘The Local Appointments Commissioners are an independent statutory body with a remit for open competition and a commitment to a policy of equal opportunity”.


Effectiveness of the Search for Candidates

The effectiveness of the search might be gleaned from the number of applicants. In 1992 there were two competitions for County Managers posts with 32 applicants for the first one and twenty eight for the second, all of these were men. Presumably some of the same men applied for both posts. But the differences in the number of applicants warrants explanation, as the number interviewed for the first competition was 21 as contrasted with only 11 for the second. In subsequent competitions the number of applicants varied from 51 for competition 3 in 1993 down to only 15 for competition 3 in 1994. Only two competitions out of the fifteen held between 1992 and 1995 included a female candidate (only one in each).


According to LAC officials the small number of applicants can be explained partly by the public versus private sector pay differentials which is seen to deter external applicants and partly presumably because of the perceived intense competition for such posts. However, it would also seem that there may be a public perception that only those with experience in Local Authorities would be considered ‘suitable candidates’. This public perception while not necessarily true might reduce the number of possible applicants, -male and female. Yet is it difficult to know in the absence of comparative data from jobs in the private sector whether these numbers indicate successful searches, or whether the numbers are disappointingly small which would suggest that the competition may not be perceived as open by eligible candidates who do not apply. This perception might well apply equally to men as to women. From interviews with Local Appointments Commission members about recent competitions it seems that few Irish external candidates apply, while there have been a small number of British applicants.


Variation in the number of applicants could also be explained by the location of the job. Some posts in large urban centres and university towns are likely to attract more candidates than other peripheral counties. The competition returns supplied to this researcher do not give county or city so this explanation could not be investigated.


Irish Test

Further, it might be interesting to ask to what extent the applicants who are qualified to apply in all other respects except the Irish test are deterred from doing so by the reference to the Irish test. All Local Appointments Commission jobs refer to an Irish test, it would be informative to know the importance of this test. How many take it? is it ever a deciding factor? This is important because it could possibly deter those who are otherwise qualified.


When is a Search Successful?

An overall review of the search for each competitive post would be useful. What are the assumed indicators of a successful ‘search’? This particualr question has not been formally addressed.


Lack of Female Applicants For Senior Posts

The Local Appointments Commission had no female applicants for most senior Local Authority posts in 1987, 1989 or 1990. In 1991 there was one female candidate for an Area Manager post in Dublin Co. Council. There were no female applicants in 1992 for two competitions for County Managers. In the 1993 competition there was only one women applicant. In 1994 there was only one woman applicant.


The Assistant County/City Manager/Personnel Officer competition in 1994 attracted 5 female candidates, one of whom was invited for interview. She was not appointed.


Table 2:1 County Manager Competitions 1992


 

Competition no.

one


(all male)

two


( all male)

No of eligible candidates

32

28

No invited for interview

21

11

No. placed on panel

9

5

No. considered for appointment

2

1

Gender breakdown of board

all male

all male

Table 2:2 County Manager Competitions 1993


 

Competition no.

one


(all male)

two


(all male)

No of eligible candidates

40

43

No invited for interview

19

22

No. placed on panel

7

9

No. considered for appointment

2

2

Gender breakdown of board

all male

all male

Table 2:3 County Manager /City Manager, Assistant County Manager Competitions 1993


Competition


no. 3,4,5,6

Male


No 3

Female


no.3

Male


No.4

Male


No. 5

Male


No.6

Female


No. 6

No. of eligible candidates

50

1

21

29

43

1

No. invited for interview

15

0

9

19

19

0

No. placed on panel

3

0

3

6

6

0

No. considered for appointment

1

0

1

2

2

0

Gender Breakdown of Interview Board

All Male

All Male

All Male

All Male

All Male

All Male

Table 2:4 County/City Manager Competitions 1994


Competition no.

one


(all male)


two


(all male)


three


(all male)


No of eligible candidates

21

19

15

No invited for interview

13

19

14

No. placed on panel

4

4

2

No. considered for appointment

1

1

1

Gender breakdown of board

all male

all male

all male

Table 2: 5 COUNTY/CITY MANAGER COMPETITIONS 1994


Competition No. 4

MALE

FEMALE

No. of eligible candidates

32

1

No. invited for interview

10

0

No. placed on panel

3

0

No. considered for appointment

1

0

Gender breakdown of interview board

4

0

Table 2:6 County/City Manager Competitions 5 & 6 1994 (all male applicants)


 

MALE

MALE

No of eligible candidates

18

16

No invited for interview

6

16

No placed on panel

2

5

No considered for appointment

2

1

Gender breakdown of interview board

4

0

Table2:7 Assistant County /City Manager Personnel Officer 1994Competition No One


 

MALE

FEMALE

No of eligible candidates

38

2

No invited for interview

21

1

No qualified by panel

4

o

No considered for appointment

2

0

Gender breakdown of interview board

3

1

Table2:8 Assistant County/City Manager Personnel Officer 1994 Competition No 2.


 

MALE

FEMALE

No of eligible candidates

28

5

No invited for interview

12

1

No qualified by board

1

0

No considered for appointment

1

0

Gender breakdown of interview board

4

0

Conclusion

We see from the tables that a very small number of women have applied for the most senior posts. However, only two were shortlisted and none of them have been appointed. There were no women on any of the interview boards for City/County Manager or Assistant Manager.


County Secretary Post

The post of County Secretary in 1992 attracted 23 male candidates for the first competition and 32 for the second. The competitions attracted 2 women and 3 women respectively. However, their overall success rates at every stage of the competition were worse than those of their male colleagues. While one woman was placed on each panel, neither was considered for appointment, while a third of the men were. Consideration for appointment is based on one’s overall ranking in the competition. The person who gets the highest marks is offered the post first. If he/she refuses it then it is offered to the next person on the panel.


Table 2:9. County Secretary Competitions 1992: First Competition


 

MALE

FEMALE

No of eligible candidates

23

2

No invited for interview

14 (60%)

1 (50%)

No placed on panel

3 (21%)

1 (100%)

No considered for appointment

1 (33%)

0 (0%)

Gender breakdown of interview board

3

0

Table 2:10 County Secretary Competition 2 1992


 

MALE

FEMALE

No of eligible candidates

32

3

No invited for interview

14 (43%)

1 (33%)

No placed on panel

6 (42%)

1 (100%)

No considered for appointment

2 (33%)

0 (0%)

Table 2: 11 Secretary Competition 1 1993


 

MALE

FEMALE

No of eligible candidates

20

1

No invited for interview

10

0

No placed on panel

3

0

No considered for appointment

1

0

Gender Breakdown of interview board

2

1

Table 2:12 County Secretary Competition 2 1993


 

MALE

FEMALE

No of eligible candidates

19

3

No invited for interview

15

2

No qualified by Board

3

1

No considered for appointment

1

0

Gender breakdown of interview board

2

1

In 1993, two competitions for the position of County Secretary attracted 4 female candidates, two of whom were selected for interview, one was qualified and placed on a panel but was not considered for appointment.


Table2:13 Competition No. 1 for County Secretary 1994



 

MALE

FEMALE

No of eligible candidates

38

0

No invited for interview

13

0

No qualified by Board

2

0

No considered for appointment

1

0

Gender breakdown of interview board

2

1

Table2:14 County Secretary Competition No. 2 1994



 

MALE

FEMALE

No of eligible candidates

40

4

No invited for interview

21

5

No qualified by Board

1

1

No considered for appointment

1

1

Gender breakdown of interview board

3

1

Table No.2:15 County Secretary Competition No. 3 1994




 

MALE

FEMALE

No of eligible candidates

58

10

No invited for interview

28

4

No qualified by Board

7

1

No considered for appointment

3

0

Gender breakdown of interview board

2

1

Table No.2:16 County Secretary Competition No. 4 1994




 

MALE

FEMALE

No of eligible candidates

21

3

No invited for interview

21

3

No qualified by Board

1

1

No considered for appointment

1

1

Gender breakdown of interview board

2

1

First Women Appointed as County Secretary

A review of the 1994 competitions shows that three of the four competitions attracted women applicants. Two were appointed, thereby creating a new precedence by the appointment of 2 women to these high level posts. The gender composition of the competitions since 1993 have included one woman on the interview board.


Finance Officer Competitions 1993

The Finance Officer was a post which in the past did not require any special qualifications. There is now a stipulation that appointments to some Local Authorities will need an Accountancy qualification. As can be seen from Table 2:17, there was one woman appointed to the position of Finance Officer in 1993. In 1994, a woman was considered for appointment but she is the same female so there is still only one female Finance Officer.


Table 2:17 Finance Officer Competitons No. 1 1993




 

MALE

FEMALE

No of eligible candidates

46

11

No invited for interview

19

3

No placed on panel

6

1

No considered for appointment

0

1

Gender breakdown of interview board

4

0

Table2:18 Finance officer Competition no 2 1993



 

MALE

FEMALE

No of eligible candidates

49

11

No invited for interview

16

2

No qualified by Board

3

1

No considered for appointment

1

0

No placed on panel

3

1

Table2:19 Finance Offcier Competition No 1 1994



 

MALE

FEMALE

No of eligible candidates

70

18

No invited for interview

29

3

No qualified by Board

8

0

No considered for appointment

2

0

Gender breakdown of interview board

4

0

Table 2: 20 Finance Officer Competition No 2 1994



 

MALE

FEMALE

No of eligible candidates

31

7

No invited for interview

31

7

No qualified by Board

17

3

No considered for appointment

1

0

Gender breakdown of interview board

5

0

Table2:21 Finance Officer Competition No 3 1994


 

MALE

FEMALE

No of eligible candidates

45

6

No invited for interview

16

1

No qualified by Board

4

1

No considered for appointment

0

1

Gender breakdown of interview board

3

1

Town Clerk Post

Competition No. 1 for Town Clerk attracted 5 women candidates and in the first competition a woman was appointed. However, in the second competition there were no women applicants. There were also fewer male applicants : i.e 14 as contrasted with 22. This is quite puzzling but is likely to be a reflection of the location and attractiveness of the post. The position varies in status and salary depending on the size of the town or city. The overall national returns for Town Clerk posts shows an increase in the number of women, but not all of these posts are handled by the LAC. As noted above smaller areas are under Local Authorities.


Table 2:22 Town Clerk Post Competition Number 1 (1992)


 

MALE

FEMALE

No of eligible candidates

22

5

No invited for interview

22

5

No placed on panel

3 (13%)

1 (20%)

No considered for appointment

0 (0%)

1 (100%)

Gender breakdown of interview board

2 (66%)

1 (33%)

Table 2:23 Town Clerk Competition No. 2 (1992)



 

MALE

FEMALE

No of eligible candidates

14

0

No invited for interview

14

0

No placed on panel

4 (28%)

0

No considered for appointment

1 (25%)

0

Gender breakdown of interview board

1 (33%)

2 (66%)

Table 2:24 Town Clerk Competition No. 1 (1994)


 

MALE

FEMALE

No of eligible candidates

10

4

No invited for interview

10

4

No qualified by Board

4

0

No considered for appointment

1

0

Gender breakdown of interview board

2

1

Table 2:25 Town Clerk Competition No. 2 (1994)



 

MALE

FEMALE

No of eligible candidates

12

3

No invited for interview

12

3

No qualified by Board

4

0

No considered for appointment

1

0

Gender breakdown of interview board

1

2

If At First You Don’t Succeed, Try And Try Again

From a research point of view it would be interesting to know why none of the female candidates for the first competition for Town Clerk applied for the second one. Further, as the position of town clerk is now one at middle management the low number of female applicants needs to be explained. In terms of the 1992 competition, only one woman was considered for appointment from the first competition. All male competitors for the second competition resulted in the appointment of one man. (See table 2:23) In the two competitions in 1994, women did very badly with none of them deemed qualified by the Board. For those competitions, women were included on the interview boards.


Overall Review of Candidature

Based on interviews with Local Appointments Commission staff there is a dominant view that the national competition pool for top positions is small and there is a sense that emergent talent becomes known. This must have been crucially so in the past when all Local Authority applicants would have applied to the LAC and been interviewed by them for posts attained to date.


However, at the present time, there may be a sense of a self-fulfilling prophecy inherent in this view about the pool of available candidates. If it is understood that they must be drawn from the local authority structures then the pool is small, if they do not have to be drawn then it may well be that local authorities are failing to attract ‘outside’ talent. In addition the almost complete lack of female applicants contributes directly to the low candidature. However, even when women competed, they have not been very successful in the past. Without access to the competition notes, it is difficult to know why women are not more successful.


Gender Composition of Interview Boards for LAC

In terms of gender breakdown of interview boards, there were no women on the interview boards for County Managers in 1992. Of the 14 competitions for County/City Managers and Assistant County/City managers held in 1994-95 only one had a woman on the interview board. There was only one woman on the board for the second County Secretary competition in 1992. However in the 1993 and 1994 competitions all six boards had one woman. In the competitons for Town Clerk in 1992 and 1994, all boards included a woman. There has been an improvement over time in the number of women appointed to interview boards by the Local Appointments Commission.


From personal interviews with LAC staff, I know that greater efforts were made in 1993 and 1994 to appoint more women to interview boards. The staff argue that it is quite difficult to get a long list of women at a sufficiently high level. Such women when identified will agree to sit on such boards once or at most twice a year as it is seen as very time consuming. Given the greater supply of men in senior management this is not seen as problematic.


The Competition: Short Listing

The interview board is also responsible for the short-listing of candidates for interview. This is a requirement under the legislation and the board are given guidelines on it. The Commissioners may if they think it necessary add to the short list. The short-listing is done by examining the submitted curriculum vitae or application form. In the words of Commission staff, “an application form is a record of achievement usually in chronological order”.


Of course some applicants may well understate their achievements and others may overstate them. Nevertheless, it is true to say that the interview can test an applicant’s overstatement whereas understatement may mean that you are never called to interview! Interview training or training in procedures for short selecting candidates is not mandatory for Board members though LAC staff are professionally trained and at all stages supervise procedures and make sure competitions are legally conducted. To do so, they have to work especially closely with the Chairperson of the Board. A number of those who sat on interview boards were interviewed for this study and they said that the interviews were organised and held in a professional manner. There was however, a tendency to favour those who had already an established career in Local Government.


Marking Schemes Used at Interviews

There are three main areas:


1)qualifications


2)general competence usually interpreted as benefits of experience or “what they have achieved,’ and,


3)personality and general suitability.


Between 50% and 60% of the marks go for the second category with the balance divided between the other two. Usually between 20% and 25% go for personality or personal attributes necessary for the job. In terms of qualifications, it is “the application of qualifications to the job” that is important, not qualifications per se.


Each member of the board is asked for a general account or assessment of each candidate and then asked to categorise them under the following headings; excellent, very good, good, average, poor. The candidates are usually ranked in order of merit. A written report is made to the Commissioners by the board. The appointment is then made by the Local Appointments Commission.


Composition of Selection Boards

A minimum of two experts are usually appointed to the board in addition to an independent chairman (usually a man). The post of chairman is an honorary one and is not renumerated. However, this has not always been feasible and there has been an increase in the extent to which fee paid chairpersons are used. Such fee paying chairmen are often retired public sector employees. Those invited are drawn from professional bodies, universities, and from the public and private sector.


In the case of competition for County Managers, for instance, there is a lay chairman usually a retired County Manager, a County Manager (from another Authority), a manager from a public or private sector and the secretary or his representative from the Dept. of Environment and a LAC staff member will be in attendance.


One can see here that there is a predominance of membership drawn from the public sector. These men (in the past they were all men) are considered ‘top class managers’ who are good at interviewing and know what the requirements of the jobs are. Existing managers are classified as experts in the field competent to make sound judgments.


However, some applicants interviewed by this researcher claim that the interview boards for such positions are unpredictable and it means that some candidates can be lucky or unlucky for instance, the balance in terms of private or public sector board members might favour or disfavour ‘outsider’ candidates. Balancing the chances of inside versus outside candidates is difficult. Being known to people on the board could be an advantage or disadvantage. The survey returns showed that men were more likely to know interview board members than women in Local Authority interviews.. Basically, the composition of a Board will affect its deliberation and its eventual selection decisions.


The Competitive Interview

The competition for these senior posts is based on interview performance. Despite its lack of predictability it is used extensively and these competitions are not supposed to take other issues into account. Matters relating to the candidates applications, and misgivings about candidates must be addressed at the interview and in that way form part of the interview process. Board members are issued with notes for interview boards by the Local Appointments Commission which inform them of the professional procedures (see appendix). The staff of the Local Appointments Commision instruct the board in the procedures of the selection process. However, board members are not trained in interviewing and this remains a problematic issue given their competitive nature.


Perceptions of Interviews by Those Who Served on Interview Boards

Those Local Authority staff interviewed to date vary in their attitude to interviews as a mode of selection. Those who sat on interview boards have evaluated individuals as requested based on their curriculum vitae, academic qualification, range of experience and how they responded to the questions asked.


Yet others say:


“the interview is a subjective thing..ok. marks are given for education, achievements but in the final analysis the interview is subjective, not scientific. Interview performance is very important and how you relate to them (the candidate) and how you think they would fit in - that can’t be scientific”


“An element of luck comes into it from the candidate’s point of view. It is subjective”.


“You can be very unlucky or lucky on the day”.


Gender Balance on Interview Boards

The identification of and agreement of the best candidate will reflect the composition of the board. The absence of women from such boards is therefore quite serious. While female board members in no way are thought to necessarily influence the outcome of interviews, it reflects and encourages a focus on gender equity in the entire process.


The stipulated eligibility requirement for interview boards is that those on the interview boards must be at least two grades higher than the post for which they are appointed interviewers. The absence of women from top posts means that it is difficult to get eligible women to sit on boards for the most senior appointments. According to the Local Appointments Commission staff, many (of the few) eligible women refuse because of pressure of work etc. The recruitment of women from outside Local Authorities is one response to that, but still presents some difficulties for them.


Members of the Local Appointments Commission interviewed claimed that they regularly updated their board members and included ‘new’ women but said that a valid directory of suitable women who were willing to serve on interview boards would be welcomed. At present suitable women come to their attention via newspaper reports, from contact with universities and public bodies. For senior posts a woman is more likely to be placed on an interview board if there are women applicants. Otherwise it is still quite common to have all male interview boards and all male applicants. This of course reproduces the idea of male power and authority, making it eventually difficult for women to be considered eligible candidates. When all the board members and applicants are men there is a real danger that ‘being a man’ becomes an implicit criterion for appointment to senior posts.


Lack of Training

Given the competitive significance of the interview, it is regrettable that interview training is not mandatory for board members. Without explicit job descriptions, and the attendant identification of skills etc. it is far more likely that the interview process is subjective and unscientific. In practice this can mean that not all candidates are assessed in an identical fashion and research elsewhere shows that this can discriminate against women. The Local Appointments Commision has commenced this training in the case of interviews who recruit engineers, so it would be advisable for them to extend this training to other sectors, especially to managerial posts.


Conclusion

The upper management levels of Local Authorities remain almost exclusively male dominated. As we saw from the tables, in the majority of cases few women apply. Even when women are eligible few are called to interview and few are recommended for appointment. To be an eligible candidate, you must have already achieved a middle management position in a Local Authority. The career path is best described as a linear one where on advances up within the organisation, one’s promotions being like the rungs of a ladder each taken in turn. In the next chapter we will examine the representation of women in middle management positions.


Recommendations on Local Appointments Commission

The Local Appointments Commission has an excellent reputation and is generally considered fair and impartial. It does exist under certain restrictions as it is a recruitment agency. The following recommendations if implemented would augment its image as a fair and impartial agency and contribute further to the recruitment of the most talented staff.


1.The Local Appointments Commission should publish an annual report giving the gender breakdown of applicants for each competition and their respective success rates.


2.Special search committees may be required to encourage a greater number of applicants from a wider range of sectors to increase gender balance among applicants.


3.To facilitate the LAC each local authority should provide very clear job specifications for advertised posts and detail any qualifications which are mandatory as opposed to optional.


4.The personal skills and competences necessary to carry out such a post should also be outlined in a way which enables any board member to evaluate applicants possession of such skills. Accurate descriptions would lead to more inclusive competition and ensure equity.


5.Each competition should be concluded by an overview of the competition in terms of its effective search, number and diversity of applicants etc.for both the outcome of the shortlisting and the interview competition.


6.A gender balance on all interview boards should be maintained, and a comprehensive directory of women who are agree to sit on interview boards should be drawn up and updated regularly.


7.Given the difficulty in getting voluntary interview board members, perhaps a small number of professional interviewers should be recruited until such time as a gender balance is available.


8.Given the fact that interviews are tantamount to examinations, each candidate should ideally be given some feedback on their performance. In this way it could be like a formal appraisal and be a learning experience. Those who performed well might be encouraged to compete again, while those who had not relevant skills might acquire them or not continue to apply.


9.Given the salience of the Commissioners, and the growing importance of equality, it might also be proper to extend their number and to include a representative from the Department of Equality or Labour.


The practice of appointing retired Local Authority employees as chairmen should be reviewed as older men may be more likely to have traditional views on women’s roles in society. Chairpersons should be selected from more diverse occupational backgrounds and ages, and gender.


Chapter 3 Gender Distribution of Middle Management

Introduction

As shown in chapters one and two, men who achieved the top positions of County and City Managers did so as part of a career path in which they continued to rise over time. This kind of career path is based on a linear career concept (Driver: 1977&1988). Those who internalise and work on a linear career concept are more likely to also engage in long range contingency planning. They make maximum use of information in developing their career. This includes being open to new information and having an ability to incorporate this in the information structure underlying their career concept. A linear career is one for life beginning in their youth and any direction of change in its pattern will be upward. Generally speaking, such a career concept is very persuasive extending to other areas of their lives as well.


The decision making style of those who have a linear career concept is characterised as a hierarchic one. This lends itself to a very careful career plan with a long range time horizon. It does tend to include an extreme focus which might ignore real family needs or alternatively they might be orchestrated to support it. In addition such an individual is likely to set perfectionist “long term achiever” goals.


The organisation of a Local Authority can be termed linear as it is a horizontally organised one. Employees move up its grades over time with only a few reaching its apex. The number of career moves it takes to get to the top depends on where one enters the system and how many grades there are to rise through. In the past, there were only five grades, but additional grades have been introduced making the ladder longer than it was, and giving individuals more promotional rungs to overcome. Moving up depends on one’s abilities and attributes and on the opportunities that present themselves.


If we wish to see whether men and women compete equally we need to compare the number of male and female candidates who apply and then compare their success rates. In chapters one and two we saw that few women even entered the competitions for top posts. Few were eligible to apply from Local Authorities. Reaching this eligibility level, in turn, depends on moving up to middle management in a Local Authority and successfully competing for promotion in their local and internal competitions. In this chapter we examine the representation of women in middle management.


Local Authorities and Their Appointments System

In the 1960s, there there were only four grades in County Councils: Clerical Officer, Staff Officer, County Secretary and Manager. Urban District Councils had Town Clerks. Recruitment to all these positions was through the Local Appointments Commission. Now, as was seen in the last chapter the posts of City/ County Managers, Assistant City /County Managers, County Secretaries and Finance Officers and some Town Clerk posts are recruited by the Local Appointments Commission. All other grades are recruted by the Local Authorities themselves, and getting to middle management is a pre-requisite for senior management.


Overtime the number of grades has increased. Large Corporations tend to have more grades than County Councils. Many authorities have Senior Administrative Officers/Assistant Principal Officer and Adminstrative Officers. Thes grades form the apex of the Local Authority promotional structure. Grade Seven of Adminstrative Officer level is considered the first tier of management with the two lower grades of Staff Officer (Grade 5) and Senior Staff Officer (Grade 6) called supervisory grades.


Vertical Segregation in Local Authorities:Senior Administrative Officers

There is only one woman at Senior Adminstrative Officer level and twenty two at Administrative Officer level. There are no women Principal Officers and only 1 Assistant Princpal Officer. Table 3:1 is a very clear demonstration of vertical segregation. This mirrors the absence of women in the top positions as noted in Chapters One and Two. However only large Local Authorities have such posts, with Dublin Corporation being the only Local Authority with Principal and Assistant Principal Officers.


TABLE 3:1 GENDER SEGREGATION BY LEVEL


LEVEL

MALE

FEMALE

Senior Administrative Officer

22 (95.7%)

1 (4.3%)

Administrative Officer

134 (85.9%)

22 (14.1%)

Principal Officer

7 (100%)

0 (0%)

Assistant Principal Officer

14 (93.3%)

1 (6.7%)

Senior Staff Officer

214 (75.9%)

68 (24.1%)

Staff Officer

215 (50.8%)

208 (49.2%)

Table 3.2 GENDER DISTRIBUTION: SENIOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER

COUNTY

MALE

FEMALE

CAVAN

-

-

CARLOW

-

-

CORK CO.COUNCIL

-

-

CORK CORPORATION

-

-

CLARE

-

-

DONEGAL

-

-

DROGHEDA

-

-

DUBLIN

-

-

DUNDALK

-

-

DUNLAOIRE\RATHDOWN

6 (85.7%)

1 (14.3%)

FINGAL

8 (100%)

0 (0%)

GALWAY CO.COUNCIL

-

-

GALWAY CORPORATION

-

-

KERRY

-

-

KILDARE

-

-

KILKENNY

-

-

LAOIS.

-

-

LEITRIM

-

-

LIMERICK CO.COUNCIL

-

-

LIMERICK CORP.

-

-

LONGFORD

-

-

LOUTH

-

-

MAYO

-

-

MEATH

-

-

MONAGHAN

-

-

OFFALY

-

-

ROSCOMMON

-

-

SLIGO

-

-

SOUTH DUBLIN

8 (100%)

0 (0%)

TIPPERARY NR

-

-

TIPPERARY SR

-

-

WATERFORD CO.COUNCIL

-

-

WATERFORD CORP.

-

-

WESTMEATH

-

-

WEXFORD

-

-

WICKLOW

-

-

TOTAL

22

1


 

(95.7%)

(4.3%)

Table 3.3 GENDER DISTRIBUTION: PRINCIPAL OFFICER

COUNTY

MALE

FEMALE

CAVAN

-

-

CARLOW

-

-

CORK CO.COUNCIL

-

-

CORK CORPORATION

-

-

CLARE

-

-

DONEGAL

-

-

DROGHEDA

-

-

DUBLIN

7 (100%)

0

DUNDALK

-

-

DUNLAOIRE\RATHDOWN

-

-

FINGAL

-

-

GALWAY CO.COUNCIL

-

-

GALWAY CORPORATION

-

-

KERRY

-

-

KILDARE

-

-

KILKENNY

-

-

LAOIS

-

-

LEITRIM

-

-

LIMERICK CO.COUNCIL

-

-

LIMERICK CORP.

-

-

LONGFORD

-

-

LOUTH

-

-

MAYO

-

-

MEATH

-

-

MONAGHAN

-

-

OFFALY

-

-

ROSCOMMON

-

-

SLIGO

-

-

SOUTH DUBLIN

-

-

TIPPERARY NR

-

-

TIPPERARY SR

-

-

WATERFORD CO.COUNCIL

-

-

WATERFORD CORP.

-

-

WESTMEATH

-

-

WEXFORD

-

-

WICKLOW

-

-

TOTAL

7

0

 

(100%)

(0%)

Table 3.4 GENDER DISTRIBUTION:ASSISTANT PRINCIPAL OFFICER

COUNTY

MALE

FEMALE

CAVAN

-

-

CARLOW

-

-

CORK CO.COUNCIL

-

-

CORK CORPORATION

-

-

CLARE

-

-

DONEGAL

-

-

DROGHEDA

-

-

DUBLIN

14 (93.3%)

1 (6.7%)

DUNDALK

-

-

DUNLAOIRE\RATHDOWN

-

-

FINGAL

-

-

GALWAY CO.COUNCIL

-

-

GALWAY CORPORATION

-

-

KERRY

-

-

KILDARE

-

-

KILKENNY

-

-

LAOIS

-

-

LEITRIM

-

-

LIMERICK CO.COUNCIL

-

-

LIMERICK CORP.

-

-

LONGFORD

-

-

LOUTH

-

-

MAYO

-

-

MEATH

-

-

MONAGHAN

-

-

OFFALY

-

-

ROSCOMMON

-

-

SLIGO

-

-

SOUTH DUBLIN

-

-

TIPPERARY NR

-

-

TIPPERARY SR

-

-

WATERFORD CO.COUNCIL

-

-

WATERFORD CORP.

-

-

WESTMEATH

-

-

WEXFORD

-

-

WICKLOW

-

-

TOTAL

14

1

 

(93.3%)

(6.7%)

Administrative Officer

The next grade of Adminstrative Officer includes 14% of women (Table 3:5), though they are only found in the large urban corporations. There are more Adminstrative Officer posts available in these corporations which overall have more more senior posts. While men dominate the most senior positions, a few women have moved up to middle management.


Table 3.5 GENDER DISTRIBUTION:ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER

COUNTY

MALE

FEMALE

CAVAN

2 (100%)

0 (0%)

CARLOW

1 (100%)

0 (0%)

CORK CORPORATION

2 (33.3%)

4 (66.7%)

CORK CO.COUNCIL

13 (100%)

0 (0%)

CLARE

2 (66.7%)

1 (33.3%)

DONEGAL

4 (100%)

0 (0%)

DROGHEDA

1 (100%)

0 (0%)

DUBLIN CORPORATION

28 (84.85%)

5 (15.15%)

DUNDALK

1 (100%)

0 (0%)

DUNLAOIRE\RATHDOWN

8 (72.27%)

3 (27.27%)

FINGAL

11 (78.6%)

3 (21.4%)

GALWAY CORPORATION

1 (100%)

0 (0%)

GALWAY CO.COUNCIL

3 (100%)

0 (0%)

KERRY

4 (100%)

0 (0%)

KILDARE

2 (66.66%)

1 (33.33%)

KILKENNY

2 (100%)

0 (0%)

LAOIS

2 (100%)

0 (0%)

LEITRIM

1 (100%)

0 (0%)

LIMERICK CO.COUNCIL

5 (100%)

0 (0%)

LIMERICK CORP.

0 (0%)

4 (100%)

LONGFORD

-

-

LOUTH

-

-

MAYO

4 (100%)

0 (0%)

MEATH

3 (100%)

0 (0%)

MONAGHAN

1 (100%)

0 (0%)

OFFALY

2 (100%)

0 (0%)

ROSCOMMON

3 (100%)

0 (0%)

SLIGO

1 (100%)

0 (0%)

SOUTH DUBLIN

11 (91.7%)

1 (8.3%)

TIPPERARY NR

2 (100%)

0 (0%)

TIPPERARY SR

3 (100%)

0 (0%)

WATERFORD CO.COUNCIL

2 (100%)

0 (0%)

WATERFORD CORP.

2 (100%)

0 (0%)

WESTMEATH

2 (100%)

0 (0%)

WEXFORD

3 (100%)

0 (0%)

WICKLOW

2 (100%)

0 (0%)

TOTAL

134


(85.9%)

22


(14.1%)

Variation by County

While the overall representation of women in managment is low, we can see from Table 3:6 that there is considerable variation between counties in the representation of women in managment positions. Women are better represented at management level in some urban Corportions but are virtually absent in County Councils.


Table3.6: REPRESENTATION OF WOMEN IN MANAGEMENT POSITIONS BY COUNTY


County

Women in Management Positions*

Limerick Corporation

4 (44.4%)

Cork Corporation

4 (33.3%)

Cavan

2 (28.6%)

Longford

1 (20%)

Tipperary NR

1 (16.7%)

Dun Laoighre

4 (14.3%)

Offaly

1 (14.3%)

Clare

1 (12.5%)

Dublin

8 (12%)

Kildare

1 (11.1%)

Fingal

3 (10.3%)

Cork Co.Council

1 (4.8%)

South Dublin

1 (4.2%)

Carlow

0

Donegal

0

Drogheda

0

Dundalk

0

Galway Corporation

0

Galway Co.Council

0

Kerry

0

Kilkenny

0

Laois

0

Leitrim

0

Louth

0

Limerick Co.Council

0

Mayo

0

Meath

0

Monaghan

0

Roscommon

0

Sligo

0

Tipperary SR

0

Waterford Co. Council

0

Waterford Corporation

0

Westmeath

0

Wexford

0

Wicklow

0

TOTAL

33

Chapter 4 Promotional Competitions To Senior Management

Senior Administrative Officer posts

Competition Success Rates

How can one explain the low representation of women in Senior Adminstrative posts? Perhaps they do not apply for these posts? Admittedly, there are few competitons for the post of Senior Adminstrative Officer as they are only offered in some new urban Corporations. This we can glean from the competitions held, which are shown in Table 4:1. While the first competition attracted four women applicants, the second and third attracted none, which is rather surprising. The lack of success in the first competition may discourage other women or the same women from appplying for the second time.


TABLE 4:1 SENIOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER COMPETITIONS:


BY COUNTY, GIVING NUMBER OF APPLICANTS & NUMBER AND RATE OF SUCCESS BY SEX.


FINGAL

 

 

 

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1993

No. Applicants

26

4

 

No. Success

6 (23%)

1 (25%)

 

 

 

 

1995

No. Applicants

18

0

 

No. Success

1 (5.5%)

0

 

 

 

 

SOUTH DUBLIN

 

 

 

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1994

No. Applicants

16

0

 

No. Success

1 (6.3%)

0

 

 

 

 

Administrative Officer Competitions

A review of the competitions for Adminstrative Officer posts by county shows that between 1992 and 1995, 46 competitions were held. Of those 38 had women applicants. Yet, the success rates for women as a whole were lower, except in the urban Corporations, as Table 4:3 indicates. These competions resulted in the appointment of 15 women candidates


TABLE 4.2


ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER COMPETITIONS:


BY COUNTY, GIVING NUMBER OF APPLICANTS & NUMBER AND RATE OF SUCCESS BY SEX.


CLARE

 

 

 

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1993

No.Applicants

2

2

 

No. Success

1 (50%)

1 (50%)

 

 

 

 

1994

No.Applicants

5

4


 

No. Success

0

1 (25%)

 

 

 

 

1995

No.Applicants

2

0

 

No.Success

1 (50%)

0

 

 

 

 

CORK CORPORATION

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1992

No.Applicants

18

4

 

No.Success

1 (5.6%)

0

 

 

 

 

1993

No.Applicants

22

8

 

No.Success

1 (4.6%)

0

 

 

 

 

1994

No.Applicants

5

3

 

No.Success

0

1 (33.3%)

 

 

 

 

1995

No.Applicants

2

3

 

No.Success

0

1 (33.3%)

 

 

 

 

1995

No.Applicants

11

7


 

No. Success

0

1 (14.3%)

 

 

 

 

CORK CO.COUNCIL

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1995

No. Applicants

11

3

 

No. Success

5 (46%)

0

 

 

 

 

DONEGAL

 

 

 

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1992

No. Applicants

7

0

 

No. Success

1 (11.1%)

0

 

 

 

 

1994

No. Applicants

9

4

 

No. Success

1 (11.1%)

0

 

 

 

 

DROGHEDA

 

 

 

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1994

No. Applicants

1

0

 

No.Success

1 (100%)

0

 

 

 

 

DUBLIN

 

 

 

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1992

No. Applicants

79

15

 

No. Success

1 (1.3%)

0

 

 

 

 

1993

No. Applicants

45

12

 

No. Success

2 (4%)

2 (17%)

 

 

 

 

DUNDALK UDC

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1995

No.Applicants

N\A

N\A

 

No.Success

0

1

 

 

 

 

DUN LAOIGHRE\RATHDOWN

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1994

No. Applicants

11

3

 

No. Success

2 (18%)

1 (33%)

 

 

 

 

FINGAL

 

 

 

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1992

No. Applicants

29

8

 

No. Success

5 (17%)

1 (12.5%)

 

 

 

 

1993

No. Applicants

38

6

 

No. Success

9 (24%)

2 (33%)

 

 

 

 

GALWAY CORPORATION

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1995

No. Applicants

12

2

 

No. Success

1 (8%)

0

 

 

 

 

GALWAY CO.COUNCIL

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1992

No. Applicants

26

4

 

No.Success

2 (7.7%)

0 (0%)

 

 

 

 

1995

No. Applicants

18

3

 

No.Success

2 (11.1%)

0 (0%)

 

 

 

 

KERRY

 

 

 

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

 

No. Applicants

5

0

 

No.Success

1 (20%)

0

 

 

 

 

 

No.Applicants

8

1

 

No.Success

2 (25%)

0

 

 

 

 

 

No.Applicants

5

0

 

No.Success

1 (20%)

0

 

 

 

 

KILKENNY

 

 

 

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1992

No. Applicants

23

6


 

No.Success

1 (4.4%)

0(0%)

 

 

 

 

LAOIS

 

 

 

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1992

No. Applicants

17

3

 

No. Success

1 (6%)

0 (0%)

 

 

 

 

1993

No. Applicants

16

3

 

No. Success

1 (6%)

0 (0%)

 

 

 

 

1994

No. Applicants

15

5

 

No. Success

1 (7%)

0 (0%)

 

 

 

 

LEITRIM

 

 

 

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1993

No. Applicants

11

4

 

No. Success

1 (9%)

0 (0%)

 

 

 

 

1994

No. Applicants

10

5

 

No. Success

1 (10%)

0 (0%)

 

 

 

 

 LOUTH

 

 

 

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1993

No. Applicants

4

2

 

No. Success

0

0 (0%)

 

 

 

 

1993

No. Applicants

5

1

 

No. Success

0

0 (0%)

 

 

 

 

LIMERICK COUNTY COUNCIL

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1993

No. Applicants

3

0

 

No. Success

2 (66%)

0

 

 

 

 

1995

No. Applicants

3

0

 

No. Success

1 (33%)

0

 

 

 

 

LIMERICK CORPORATION

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1993

No. Applicants

19

6

 

No. Success

1 (5%)

1 (17%)

 

 

 

 

1994

No. Applicants

20

10

 

No. Success

1 (5%)

1 (10%)

 

 

 

 

MAYO

 

 

 

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1995

No. Applicants

6

4

 

No. Success

1 (17%)

0 (0%)

 

 

 

 

MEATH

 

 

 

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1995

No.Applicants

20

4

 

No. Success

1 (5%)

0 (0%)

 

 

 

 

ROSCOMMON

 

 

 

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1993

No. Applicants

17

7

 

No. Success

1 (6%)

0 (0%)

 

 

 

 

1995

No. Applicants

15

5

 

No. Success

1 (7%)

1 (20%)

 

 

 

 

SLIGO

 

 

 

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1992

No. Applicants

11

3

 

No. Success

1 (9%)

0 (0%)

 

 

 

 

1994

No. Applicants

6

3

 

No. Success

1 (17%)

0 (0%)

 

 

 

 

SOUTH DUBLIN

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1994

No.Applicants

17

2

 

No.Success

1 (5.9%)

0 (0%)

 

 

 

 

WATERFORD COUNTY COUNCIL

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1992

No. Applicants

2

0

 

No. Success

1 (50%)

0

 

 

 

 

1995

No. Applicants

19

3

 

No. Success

1 (5%)

0 (0%)

 

 

 

 

WEXFORD

 

 

 

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1992

No.Applicants

18

3

 

No.Success

1 (5.6%)

0 (0%)

 

 

 

 

1995

No.Applicants

15

5

 

No.Success

1 (6.7%)

0 (0%)

 

 

 

 

WICKLOW

 

 

 

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1993

No. Applicants

20

5

 

No.Success

1 (5%)

0 (0%)

 

 

 

 

1995*

No.Applicants

11 (gender breakdown not available)

 

No. Success

1

0

 

 

 

 

TOTALS:4:3


APPLICANTS & SUCCESSES BY YEAR*


1992

 

 

 

 

TOTAL

MALE

FEMALE

No. Applicants

276

230

46

No. Success

16

15 (6.5%)

1 (2.2%)

 

 

 

 

1993

 

 

 

 

TOTAL

MALE

FEMALE

No. Applicants

258

202

56

No. Success

26

20 (9.9%)

6 (10.7%)

 

 

 

 

1994


 


 

 

 

TOTAL

MALE

FEMALE

No. Applicants

138

99

39

No. Success

13

9 (9.1%)

4 (10.3%)

 

 

 

 

1995*


 


 

 

 

TOTAL

MALE

FEMALE

No. Applicants

184

134

39

No. Success

18

15 (11.2%)

3 (7.7%)

Table 4:3 gives the comparative success rate for men and women for Adminstrative Officer posts. For all years except 1993, the success rate for women was lower than that of men. Increasingly, a lower proportionate success rate is seen as a sign of possible indirect discrimination. One expects to see success rates proportionate to the number of applicants and this is certainly not the case. Obtaining a promotion has three distinct stages. Firstly, one must decide to go forward for promotion which in itself is a demanding decision. Secondly, one must prepare for the interview which is a competitive one at which your suitability for the job is assessed. Thirdly, you must perform well on the day, at the interview.


Deciding to Apply

Interview material gives the context for these competitive interviews. The first step is to actually enter the competition and this entails believing that you are competent to do the job as the following quotation from a female candidate shows:


“I did a lot of preparation. I became focused on the knowledge I had to know and I talked to people I knew well who had got promotion and how they actually approached it, and I psyched myself up to it much better the third time, I wasn’t prepared personality wise for the second time. I looked at people round me and saw what they were actually doing at that level and I said to myself maybe I had an exaggerated view of what they’re looking for at that level, I thought they were looking for someone greater, someone reasonably sane, quite straight forward”


But candidates had to initially get the measure of the job and what it required:


“I felt they were looking for someone pragmatic..who had no difficulty with problems..who would explore different avenues and come down on one side..someone creative..with an open mind (to solutions) ..and who would get on with people as there was always the potential to be a problem, so you had to be a diplomatic person..and factual..because your conclusions came from the facts.”


Interview Preparation

The second stage is the interview preparation. Preparation is based on reading newspapers, professional journals and consultants reports. Because the applicant is applying for a senior post they have to be knowledgeable about all aspects of the organisation and its activities. They may know all about the section they work in but this is not sufficient.


Mentors and Study Groups

Some employees had good mentors who at a very early stage emphasised the importance of study and advised them on what they might study in order to get ahead in the organisation. The postal survey showed this as a frequent occurrence with 61% of the male respondents and 70% of the female respondents saying they have had a mentor at some stage in their career. Some employees interviewed also said their mentors recommended that they do courses such as those offered by the Institute of Public Administration.


Many of those in senior positions had been part of study groups who prepared in groups for promotional competitions. Typically each member of the study group contributed their area of expertise and this facilitated an exchange of ideas and knowledge. There is a study group tradition in Local Authorities. Such study groups were often started as early as Staff Officer competitions which in the past were conducted by the Local Appointments Commission. Some of those now in top posts once belonged to one of these small study groups. These also exist in Corporations. However, for senior posts in the past they were exclusively male as only the men were eligible to apply. In one Corporation a group of women convened a study group. Their male colleagues were highly critical of this conveniently forgetting they had excluded women from theirs in the past.


One successful candidate had taken a week of her leave to prepare for her last promotional interview. Preparation for these management interviews was different to earlier ones she said. You had to have:


“thought about what the post is, what they are looking for and what you have to give .... and will you fit into that .... That mental change was big for me.”


She joined a small study groups a few weeks previous to help prepare for the interview. Since joining the Corporation she had taken a degree and had come first place in her last competitive interview for grade 6, so she thought she should attempt grade 7.


Interview Performance

The third stage is the actual interview performance itself. For higher level interviews (Adminstrative Officer) the questions were broader and more policy orientated, using the applicants general knowledge, expertise and understanding of public policy in a variety of areas. A good analysis and comprehension of topical issues and policy recommendations were required.


“I was nervous for the interview..literally had a blank for the first two minutes. I think the way he handled it (chairperson) was quite good.. When I came out I thought it had gone quite well, it was a discussion interview.. That interview was well handled..”


“In some parts of the interview they set up ‘situations’ and asked what would you do..you drew on your experience and they saw that you drew on your experience.”


So the preparation for these competitive interviews has to be done but the interview itself has to be managed. Some of those who sat on interview boards claimed that women were often better prepared than men. For lower grades, some had a tendency to learn things by heart in a parrot like fashion and that did not create a good impression. According to those who sat on interview boards, the basis for which selection is made at interview is on how you have performed in your career to date and how you come across on the day to the interview board, one of the telling factors is how a person thinks on their feet.


However, the Local Authority network is a small one. Some of those interviewed felt that at times the job was already allocated to someone even before they were interviewed for it. Talking about a forthcoming competition one respondent said:


“but I’ve heard since that’s sewn up, there’s a guy in it who was given it, then he was acting in it, that he’s going to get it because he was acting in it, ..there’s a lot of that, that means you have to link in to their (system) .. I did very well in the last interview but it went to a guy who was a protege of another man and as soon as that man was on the board he was going to get it anyway”…


This point is a crucial one but one that is very difficult to access information about without analysis of interviews. Given the subjectivity of interview boards, some board members are quite likely to be keen on getting their favourites appointed, whereas other board members may not be unduly concerned, especially if all candiates are of a high calibre.


Adequate Experience for the Job

While there are no formal requirements, women who perform extremely well at interview can be told that they don’t have enough experience:


“I was in for another job since and that was a great interview, but I was told afterwards by the people on the board that unless I went to a work section I wouldn’t be promoted, that I was too long in the service section.. I’m finding it difficult to get out.”


Lack of experience can also be involved in appraisal of some candidates but ignored in the case of others. This practice can be discriminatory as more ??? demands made of female candidates.


Gender Differences in Performance

One woman who had sat on a number of interview boards said that she had noticed gender differences in interview performance:


“Women get nervous..you can visibly see they’re nervous..they blush, their necks sometimes show a red rash..they can sound hysterical just because their voices are higher I’ve seen two people cry at interview..it was just too much..but interviews are very false. Men are much better at handling themselves..men are always impeccably dressed..you always feel that they are entitled to the job, that’s a big thing..women are more tentative..not as assertive..Men are generally more in control..


She thought that women could be trained to perform well at interview.


“what they know is not always as important as how they portray what they know”..


Survey Data on Interviews

A good perfomance at interview and a proven record of achievement were considered the two most important traits for promotion to senior posts by survey respondents. More women (27%) stressed perfomance at interview than men (23%), whereas moremen (27%) rated ‘proven record of achievement’ as the most important. The majority of the sample reported that the last interview they did was conducted professionally (89% of men and women). Yet only half the total sample of men and women agreed that interviews were the best way of selecting people for positions. With only approximately 60% of the sample saying that they did justice to themselves in the last interview they attended. Although 91% of them agreed that it was possible to train for interviews.


Gender Composition of Interview Boards

For middle mangement posts in the past, there were no women on the interview boards. For recent competitions the following table shows their representation.


TABLE 4:4(SENIOR) ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER COMPETITIONS


GRADE

TOTAL NO. COMPETITION

NO.WITH NO WOMEN ON INTERVIEW BOARD

NO.WITH WOMEN ON INTERVIEW BOARDS

Senior Administrative Officer

3

3 (100%)

0 (0%)

Administrative Officer

46

41 (89.1%)

5 (10.9%)

To an extent the requirement that those on the interview board be two levels higher than the post being competed for is one part of the explanation for the low representation of women on interview boards. However, few women who I have interviewed even in senior posts have been called upon for interview service. The survey data shows that 73% of men as contrasted with only 55% of women had ever sat on an interview board. This finding suggests that women are not asked as often as men to sit on interview boards.


The interview board is drawn from Local Authorities staff. For instance an interview board will be composed of the following all drawn from outside: Manager/ retired Manager, County Secretary or Administrative Officer and a Finance Officer. Virtually all of these posts are still male dominated. In the past they were also quite likely to be older men.


Marriage Bar

The existence of the marriage bar until 1973, eliminated many potential candidates (women). In the past, the long wait before one qualified for promotion especially if one was a Clerk Typist meant that promotion was not a priority. It was a long way off so it did not occupy women’s minds. Gender roles were very traditional and many women assumed that they would marry and retire. It is quite possible that senior older men on interview boards still see women as having very traditional roles.


Geographical Mobility

Typically men as breadwinners with non-working wives were free to move, married women were unlikely to move from one County Council to another. This geographical mobility is crucial in County Council promotions but may not be crucial in larger Urban Corporations. The survey data shows that men have moved Local Authority more often than women; 48% of men never having moved compared with 52% of women. Men have also moved home more often than women, 70% of men compared to 87% of women saying they had never moved home. However Dublin based staff are less likely to have to move for promotional purposes.


Chapter Five Gender Distribution in Supervisory Posts

Senior Staff Officers (Grade 6)

Women constitute almost a quarter of Senior Staff Officers (see table 5.1). Grades 6 is still a supervisory grade whereas grade 7 (Administrative Officer) is seen as the first tier of management.


Table 5.1 GENDER DISTRIBUTION:


SENIOR STAFF OFFICER

COUNTY

MALE

FEMALE

CAVAN

2 (100%)

0 (0%)

CARLOW

4 (100%)

0 (0%)

CORK CO.COUNCIL

10 (91%)

1 (9%)

CORK CORPORATION

4 (66.7%)

2 (33.3%)

CLARE

3 (100%)

0 (0%)

DONEGAL

6 (100%)

0 (0%)

DROGHEDA

1 (100%)

0 (0%)

DUBLIN

51 (70.8%)

21 (29.2%)

DUNDALK (UDC)

1 (100%)

0 (0%)

DUNLAOIRE\RATHDOWN

12 (50%)

12 (50%)

FINGAL

16 (76.2%)

5 (23.8%)

GALWAY CORPORATION

3 (100%)

0 (0%)

GALWAY CO. COUNCIL

6 (75%)

2 (25%)

KERRY

8 (100%)

0 (0%)

KILDARE

5 (83.33%)

1 (16.67%)

KILKENNY

3 (75%)

1 (25%)

LAOIS

2 (66.67%)

1 (33.33%)

LEITRIM

1 (20%)

4 (80%)

LIMERICK CO. COUNCIL

4 (80%)

1 (20%)

LIMERICK CORP.

3 (75%)

1 (25%)

LONGFORD

2 (100%)

0 (0%)

LOUTH

1 (50%)

1 (50%)

MAYO

6 (100%)

0 (0%)

MEATH

4 (80%)

1 (20%)

MONAGHAN

3 (100%)

0 (0%)

OFFALY

2 (66.67%)

1 (33.3)

ROSCOMMON

3 (60%)

2 (40%)

SLIGO

4 (100%)

0 (0%)

SOUTH DUBLIN

15 (68.2%)

7 (31.8%)

TIPPERARY NR

1 (25%)

3 (75%)

TIPPERARY SR

4 (100%)

0 (0%)

WATERFORD CO.COUNCIL

4 (100%)

0 (0%)

WATERFORD CORP.

4 (100%)

0 (0%)

WESTMEATH

6 (100%)

0 (0%)

WEXFORD

3 (75%)

1 (75%)

WICKLOW

7 (100%)

0 (0%)

TOTAL

214 (75.9%)

68 (24.1%)

Seventeen of the County Councils and Corporations have no female senior staff officer. However, there is a considerable range with Leitrim and Tipperary having 80% and 75% of Senior Staff officers female. Dublin, DunLaoire/Rathdown,Louth having 50%. Table 5.2 gives a gender breakdown of applicants by county by rate of success.


SENIOR STAFF OFFICER COMPETITIONS: TABLE5:2


BY COUNTY, GIVING NUMBER OF APPLICANTS & NUMBER AND RATE OF SUCCESS BY SEX.


CARLOW

 

 

 

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1994

No. Applicants

8

6

 

No. Success

1 (12.5%)

0

 

 

 

 

1995

No. Applicants

2

0

 

No. Success

1 (50%)

0

 

 

 

 

CLARE

 

 

 

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1994

No. Applicants

2

6

 

No. Success

1 (50%)

0

 

 

 

 

1995

No. Applicants

9

14

 

No. Success

1 (11.1%)

0

 

 

 

 

CORK CORPORATION

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1992

No. Applicants

23

10

 

No. Success

0

1 (10%)

 

 

 

 

1995

No. Applicants

3

2

 

No. Success

0

1 (50%)

 

 

 

 

CORK COUNTY COUNCIL

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1993

No. Applicants

17

7

 

No. Success

3 (18%)

0

 

 

 

 

DONEGAL

 

 

 

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1992

No. Applicants

8

2

 

No. Success

3 (37.5%)

0

 

 

 

 

DUBLIN

 

 

 

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1992

No. Applicants

109

43

 

No. Success

6 (5.5)

3 (6.9%)

 

 

 

 

1994

No. Applicants

64

23

 

No. Success

4 (6.25)

2 (9%)

 

 

 

 

DUN LAOIGHRE\RATHDOWN

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1994

No. Applicants

10

5

 

No. Success

2 (20%)

1 (20%)

 

 

 

 

FINGAL

 

 

 

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1992

No. Applicants

43

14

 

No. Success

5 (12%)

1 (7%)

 

 

 

 

1993

No. Applicants

40

17

 

No. Success

10 (25%)

8 (47%)

 

 

 

 

1994

No. Applicants

30

7

 

No. Success

1 (33%)

0

 

 

 

 

GALWAY CO. COUNCIL

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1992

No. Applicants

17

4

 

No. Success

1 (5.9%)

0

 

 

 

 

1993

No. Applicants

2

4

 

No. Success

1 (50%)

0

 

 

 

 

1994

No.Applicants

19

10

 

No.Success

2 (10.5%)

0

 

 

 

 

1995

No.Applicants

10

9

 

No.Success

1 (10%)

1 (11.1%)

 

 

 

 

KERRY

 

 

 

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

 

No. Applicants

2

1

 

No. Success

1 (50%)

0

 

 

 

 

 

No. Applicants

5

1

 

No. Success

1 (20%)

0

 

 

 

 

KILDARE

 

 

 

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1992

No. Applicants

3

4

 

No. Success

1 (33%)

0

 

 

 

 

KILKENNY

 

 

 

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1994

No. Applicants

6

1

 

No. Success

0

1 (100%)

 

 

 

 

LAOIS

 

 

 

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1992

No. Applicants

13

4

 

No. Success

0

1 (25%)

 

 

 

 

1993

No. Applicants

1

0

 

No. Success

1 (100%)

0

 

 

 

 

1995

No. Applicants

3

1

 

No. Success

1 (33%)

0

 

 

 

 

LEITRIM

 

 

 

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1993

No. Applicants

3

2

 

No. Success

0

1 (50%)

 

 

 

 

1994

No. Applicants

5

4

 

No. Success

0

1 (25)%

 

 

 

 

LOUTH

 

 

 

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1994

No. Applicants

17

9

 

No. Success

0

1 (11%)

 

 

 

 

LIMERICK COUNTY COUNCIL

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1992

No. Applicants

4

1

 

No. Success

1 (25%)

0

 

 

 

 

1993

No. Applicants

13

10

 

No. Success

1 (7.7%)

0

 

 

 

 

1993

No. Applicants

4

0

 

No. Success

2 (50%)

0

 

 

 

 

1994

No. Applicants

1

1

 

No. Success

1 (100%)

0

 

 

 

 

LIMERICK CORPORATION

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1992

No. Applicants

4

3

 

No. Success

0

1 (33%)

 

 

 

 

1992

No. Applicants

13

8

 

No. Success

1 (8%)

2 (25%)

 

 

 

 

1993

No. Applicants

18

10

 

No. Success

0

1 (10%)

 

 

 

 

MAYO

 

 

 

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1995

No. Applicants

10

5

 

No. Success

1 (10%)

0

 

 

 

 

MEATH

 

 

 

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

 

 

 

 

1994

No.Applicants

24

8

 

No.Success

1 (4.2%)

0

 

 

 

 

1995

No.Applicants

6

7

 

No.Success

1 (16.7%)

0

 

 

 

 

MONAGHAN

 

 

 

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1993

No. Applicants

11

2

 

No. Success

1 (9%)

0

 

 

 

 

OFFALY

 

 

 

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1992

No. Applicants

3

0

 

No. Success

1 (33.3%)

0

 

 

 

 

1995

No. Applicants

7

4

 

No. Success

0

1 (25%)

 

 

 

 

ROSCOMMON

 

 

 

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1992

No. Applicants

21

8

 

No. Success

1 (5%)

0

 

 

 

 

1993

No. Applicants

10

4

 

No. Success

1 (10%)

0

 

 

 

 

1994

No. Applicants

3

4

 

No. Success

0

1 (25%)

 

 

 

 

1995

No. Applicants

1

0

 

No. Success

1 (100%)

0

 

 

 

 

SLIGO

 

 

 

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1992

No. Applicants

7

5

 

No. Success

1 (14.3%)

0

 

 

 

 

1993

No. Applicants

4

1

 

No. Success

1 (25%)

0

 

 

 

 

1994

No. Applicants

9

6

 

No. Success

1 (11%)

0

 

 

 

 

1994

No. Applicants

1

0

 

No. Success

1 (100%)

0

 

 

 

 

SOUTH DUBLIN

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1994

No.Applicants

26

7

 

No.Success

1 (3.9%)

2 (28.6%)

 

 

 

 

1995

No.Applicants

20

8

 

No.Success

2 (10%)

1 (12.5%)

 

 

 

 

TIPPERARY SR

 

 

 

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1993

No. Applicants

4

2

 

No. Success

1 (25%)

0

 

 

 

 

WATERFORD COUNTY COUNCIL

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1994

No. Applicants

2

0

 

No. Success

1 (50%)

0

 

 

 

 

WATERFORD CORPORATION

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1992

No. Applicants

21

7

 

No. Success

0

1 (14%)

 

 

 

 

1994

No. Applicants

4

1

 

No. Success

0

0

 

 

 

 

1994

No. Applicants

3

2

 

No. Success

1 (33%)

1 (50%)

 

 

 

 

1995

No. Applicants

9

4

 

No. Success

2 (22%)

0

 

 

 

 

WESTMEATH

 

 

 

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1992

No. Applicants

9

0

 

No. Success

1 (11%)

0

 

 

 

 

1993

No. Applicants

14

0

 

No. Success

1 (7%)

0

 

 

 

 

1995

No. Applicants

6

0

 

No. Success

1 (16%)

0

 

 

 

 

WEXFORD

 

 

 

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1993

No.Applicants

15

4

 

No.Success

2 (13.3%)

0

 

 

 

 

1994

No.Applicants

2

2

 

No. Success

1 (50%)

0

 

 

 

 

1995

No.Applicants

8

5

 

No.Success

1 (12.5%)

1 (20%)

 

 

 

 

WICKLOW

 

 

 

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1993

No. Applicants

2

1

 

No. Success

1 (50%)

0

 

 

 

 

1993

No. Applicants

7

0

 

No. Success

1 (14%)

0

 

 

 

 

1994

No. Applicants

20

9

 

No. Success

1 (5%)

0

 

 

 

 

1995

No. Applicants

4

0

 

No. Success

1 (25%)

0

 

 

 

 

1995

No. Applicants

4

1

 

No. Success

1 (25%)

0

 

 

 

 

TABLE 5:3 TOTALS of SENIOR STAFF OFFICER COMPETITIONS:


APPLICANTS & SUCCESSES BY YEAR*


1992

 

 

 

 

TOTAL

MALE

FEMALE

No. Applicants

411

298

113

No. Success

32

22 (7.4%)

10 (8.9%)

 

 

 

 

1993

 

 

 

 

TOTAL

MALE

FEMALE

No. Applicants

229

165

64

No. Success

37

27 (16.4%)

10 (15.6%)

 

 

 

 

1994

 

 

 

 

TOTAL

MALE

FEMALE

No. Applicants

367

256

111

No. Success

30

20 (7.8%)

10 (9%)

 

 

 

 

1995

 

 

 

 

TOTAL

MALE

FEMALE

No. Applicants

162

102

60

No. Success

20

15 (14.7%)

5 (8.3%)

 

 

 

 

Woman Friendly Counties?

The Totals Table 5.3 shows the overall success rates in Senior Staff Officer competitions for men and women over the last four years. Overall women had a slighty higher success rate in 1992 (8.9% compared to 7.4%) and in 1994 (9% compared to 7.8%), but a lower rate in 1993 (15.6% compared to 16.4%) and 1995 (8.3% compared to 14.7%). However these figures do not reveal the regional variation in success rates. In 31 competitions for which women entered no woman was succesful. Some counties emerge showing good success rates for women: Cork, all the Dublin Councils and Corportions, Kilkenny, Laois, Leitrim and Limerick Corporation. In stark contrast Limerick County Council, Meath, Mayo, Carlow, Clare, Cork Co. Council, Donegal, Kerry, Kildare, Monaghan Sligo, Tipperary South and Wicklow had several competitions with female candidates but did not appoint any women.


These promotional competitions are handled by the Local Authorities themselves and there may well be a more positive ethos towards women in management in some Local Authorities than in others. However, in appointments to these posts there is usually only one vacancy so the job goes to either a man or a woman except in the newly created urban Corporations where a number of appointments were made. Other studies of equal opportunities show the difficulties in appointing women to such posts when it is perceived that men are the direct losers.


Interview

The interview content for Senior Staff Officer was quite similar but more detailed than those of grade 5. The interview content often reflected the interests of those on the interview boards. The following interview excerpt gives a flavour of one woman’s experience of an interview for Grade 6:


“I had prepared a lot of stuff for it and one of the things I didn’t prepare was roads..the manager, who was notorious for only promoting men and only promoting his proteges ..he discovered very early on that I didn’t know about roads and he persisted to ask me about roads for the whole interview ..I came out of that one in tears, it was a disaster…it was really embarassing..they expect you to have a massive amount of information ..it was a learning experience..”.


Many candidates find the oral examination type interview offputting. Such knowledge is generally acquired on the job. In addition it is possible to consult the relevant legislation as required. A recent study of Promotional Patterns of Female Staff in Kerry County Council found that “the interview places undue emphasis on knowledge of the legislation, rather than on the candidate’s experience and overall suitability” (IPA:1995). Staff interviewed had a greater preference for interviews which asked what you would do in particular hypothetical situations. However, in-depth interviews revealed that interview content and style varied from one Local Authority to another. Such variation may be disadvatageous to candidates-male and female in some Local Authorities. A common interview content, a uniform approach and procedures such as that used by the Local Appointments Commission is desirable. Staff who sit on interview boards should be trained in interview techniques and personnel staff should have special training to ensure equitable approach and treatment. This training should be co-ordinated by the Dept. of the Environment with advice from the Dept. of Equality and Law Reform.


Staff Officers

The proportion of women in this grade is now almost half (49%) as can be seen in Table 5:4


Table 5.4 GENDER DISTRIBUTION: STAFF OFFICER

COUNTY

MALE

FEMALE

CAVAN

2 (50%)

2 (50%)

CARLOW

2 (100%)

0 (0%)

CORK CO.COUNCIL

15 (57.69%)

11 (42.31%)

CORK CORPORATION

15 (71.4%)

6 (28.6%)

CLARE

3 (42.86%)

4 (57.14%)

DONEGAL

5 (71.43%)

2 (28.57%)

DROGHEDA

1 (50%)

1 (50%)

DUBLIN

56 (48.7%)

59 (51.3%)

DUNDALK

0 (0%)

2 (100%)

DUNLAOIRE\RATHDOWN

15 (44.1%)

19 (55.9%)

FINGAL

16 (50%)

16 (50%)

GALWAY CORPORATION

2 (50%)

2 (50%)

GALWAY CO.COUNCIL

1 (10%)

9 (90%)

KERRY

1 (25%)

3 (75%)

KILDARE

1 (20%)

4 (80%)

KILKENNY

2 (100%)

0 (0%)

LAOIS

3 (50%)

3 (50%)

LEITRIM

2 (66.67%)

1 (33.33%)

LIMERICK CO.COUNCIL

4 (50%)

4 (50%)

LIMERICK CORP.

5 (50%)

5 (50%)

LONGFORD

3 (75%)

1 (25%)

LOUTH

4 (57.14%)

3 (42.86%)

MAYO

2 (40%)

3 (60%)

MEATH

3 (50%)

3 (50%)

MONAGHAN

1 (20%)

4 (80%)

OFFALY

1 (100%)

0 (0%)

ROSCOMMON

3 (60%)

2 (40%)

SLIGO

2 (40%)

3 (60%)

SOUTH DUBLIN

16 (48.5%)

17 (51.5%)

TIPPERARY NR

2 (33.33%)

4 (66.67%)

TIPPERARY SR

7 (63.64%)

4 (36.36%)

WATERFORD CO.COUNCIL

5 (83.33%)

1 (16.67%)

WATERFORD CORP.

3 (60%)

2 (40%)

WESTMEATH

4 (100%)

0 (0%)

WEXFORD

4 (44.4%)

5 (55.6%)

WICKLOW

4 (57.14%)

3 (42.86%)

TOTAL

215 (50.8%)

208 (49.2%)

Variation By County

The gender balance however varies considerably from one County Council or Corporation to another as can be seen in Table 5:4. Monaghan and Kildare having a proportion as high as 80%.; while Offaly, Westmeath and Carlow have no female Staff Officers.


In Table 5:5 the posts of Senior Staff Officer and Staff Officer are amalgamated to see the overall representation of women in supervisory posts by county and are presented in descending order. Galway County Council, Leitrim, Dundalk and Tipperary North emerge on top with between 62% and 70% of all Senior Staff Officers and Staff Officers being female while Carlow and Westmeath appear with no women in either of these grades.


Classification of Local Authorities by Gender

If we amalgamate all grades from Staff Officer level and above we see that there is considerable variation betwen Local Authorities. Some - Carlow, and Westmeath are exclusively male while others such as Galway County Council, Leitrim, Limerick Corportion and Tipperary North Riding have more than 50% female in these grades. (See table in Appendix 2). It is likely that in those Local Authorities the organisational culture has changed and that women’s opportunities have greatly improved. This is also likely to reduce the stereotyping of supervisory and management posts as ones only occupied by men. In contrast women in Local Authorities with no women in either supervisory or management level are going to find it more difficult to be promoted as the overall ethos of the organisation towards women in likely to be negative. An analysis of the success rates of women in competitions by Local Authorities in the following tables supports this interpretation. Women apply for the posts but are not successful.


TABLE5.5 REPRESENTATION OF WOMEN IN SUPERVISORY POSITIONS BY COUNTY


County

Women in Supervisory Positions (grade 5 & 6)

Tipperary NR

7 (70%)

Dundalk

2 (66%)

Leitrim

5 (62.5%)

Galway Co.Council

11 (61.1%)

Dun Laoighre

31 (53.5%)

Wexford

6 (46.2%)

Kildare

5 (45.5%)

Laois

4 (44.4%)

Louth

4 (44.4%)

South Dublin

24 (43.6%)

Limerick Corporation

6 (42.9%)

Dublin Corporation

80 (42.8%)

Clare

4 (40%)

Roscommon

4 (40%)

Fingal

21 (39.6%)

Limerick County Council

5 (38.5%)

Meath

4 (36.4%)

Cavan

2 (33.3%)

Drogheda

1 (33.3%)

Sligo

3 (33.3%)

Cork County Council

12 (32.4%)

Cork Corporation

8 (29.8%)

Galway Corporation

2 (28.6%)

Mayo

3 (27.3%)

Tipperary SR

4 (26.7%)

Kerry

3 (25%)

Offaly

1 (25%)

Waterford Corporation

2 (22.2%)

Wicklow

3 (21.4%)

Kilkenny

1 (16.7%)

Longford

1 (16.7%)

Donegal

2 (15.4%)

Monaghan

1 (12.5%)

Waterford Co. Council

1 (10%)

Carlow

0 (0%)

Westmeath

0 (0%)

TOTAL

273

Competition for Staff Officer Posts

Competitions for Staff Officers are organised by the Local Authorities themselves via internal promotional competition and open competitions. This is a supervisory grade so one would expect an equal representation of women in this grade and not extensive regional disparity as can be seen in Table:5:5.


Gender Imbalances by County

The data on competitions in Table 5:6 shows that the success rate in competitions reflects the overal gender imbalance within each County Council. Those with no female Staff Officers are unlikely to appoint any as the following Table 5.6 shows. Such a pattern suggests that the overall ethos of the Local Authority may reflect the presence or absence of traditional attitudes to women in competitions. The organisational culture may be slightly biased against female candidates. This culture is more likely to be reproduced and go undetected given that Local Authorities which are solely responsible for the recruitment and promotion of their own staff.


TABLE 5.6


STAFF OFFICER COMPETITIONS:


BY COUNTY, GIVING NUMBER OF APPLICANTS & NUMBER AND RATE OF SUCCESS BY SEX.


CARLOW

 

 

 

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1993

No. Applicants

10

6

 

No. Success

1 (10%)

0

 

 

 

 

1994

No. Applicants

9

9

 

No. Success

0

1 (11.1%)

 

 

 

 

CLARE

 

 

 

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1993

No. Applicants

1

8

 

No.Success

0

1 (12.5%)

 

 

 

 

1993

No.Applicants

20

20

 

No.Success

0

2 (10%)

 

 

 

 

1994

No.Applicants

2

8

 

No.Success

0

2 (25%)

 

 

 

 

1995

No.Applicants

3

4

 

No.Success

0

0

 

 

 

 

CORK CORPORATION

 

 

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1992

No.Applicants

36

21

 

No.Success

1 (2.8%)

1 (4.8%)

 

 

 

 

1995

No.Applicants

26

12

 

No.Success

2 (7.7%)

1 (8.3%)

 

 

 

 

1995

No.Applicants

4

6

 

No.Success

1 (25%)

1 (16.7%)

 

 

 

 

CORK CO.COUNCIL

 

 

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1992

No. Applicants

5

3

 

No. Success

0

1 (33.3%)

 

 

 

 

1993

No. Applicants

28

9

 

No. Success

2 (7.1%)

2 (22.2%)

 

 

 

 

1994

No. Applicants

31

11

 

No. Success

3 (9.7%)

2 (18.2%)

 

 

 

 

DONEGAL

 

 

 

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1993

No. Applicants

7

7

 

No. Success

1 (14.3%)

0

 

 

 

 

1994

No. Applicants

11

4

 

No. Success

3 (27.3%)

1 (25%)

 

 

 

 

DROGHEDA

 

 

 

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1994

No.Applicants

13

10

 

No.Success

1 (7.7%)

0

 

 

 

 

1994

No.Applicants

8

8

 

No.Success

1 (12.5%)

1 (12.5%)

 

 

 

 

DUBLIN

 

 

 

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1992

No. Applicants

81

84

 

No. Success

14 (17.3%)

11 (13.1%)

 

 

 

 

DUNDALK URBAN DISTRICT COUNCIL

1992

 

MALE

FEMALE

 

No.Applicants

N\A

N\A

 

No.Success

0

1

 

 

 

 

DUN LAOIGHRE\RATHDOWN

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1994

No. Applicants

10

15

 

No. Success

2 (20%)

4 (26.7%)

 

 

 

 

FINGAL

 

 

 

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1992

No. Applicants

57 TOTAL- split not available

 

No. Success

2

1

 

 

 

 

1993

No. Applicants

32

3.9

 

No. Success

12 (37.5%)

15 (38.5%)

 

 

 

 

1994

No. Applicants

33

18

 

No. Success

0

1 (5.6%)

 

 

 

 

GALWAY CORPORATION

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1992

No. Applicants

14

18

 

No. Success

1 (7.1%)

0

 

 

 

 

1994

No. Applicants

6

15

 

No. Success

2 (33.3%)

3 (20%)

 

 

 

 

GALWAY CO.COUNCIL

 

 

 

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1992

No.Applicants

14

16

 

No.Success

0

1 (6.3%)

 

 

 

 

1993

No. Applicants

3

9

 

No.Success

1 (33.3%)

0

 

 

 

 

KERRY

 

 

 

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

 

No.Applicants

13

17

 

No.Success

1 (7.7%)

0

 

 

 

 

 

No.Applicants

6

4

 

No.Success

1 (16.7%)

0

 

 

 

 

 

No.Applicants

7

7

 

No.Success

2 (28.6%)

1 (14.3%)

 

 

 

 

KILDARE

 

 

 

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1993

No. Applicants

18

15

 

No. Success

0

0

 

 

 

 

1993

No. Applicants

15

12

 

No. Success

0

1 (8.3%)

 

 

 

 

1993

No. Applicants

5

3

 

No. Success

1 (20%)

0

 

 

 

 

KILKENNY

 

 

 

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1993

No.Applicants

18

5

 

No.Success

2 (11.1%)

0

 

 

 

 

1995

No.Applicants

17

9

 

No.Success

1 (5.9%)

0

 

 

 

 

LAOIS

 

 

 

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1992

No. Applicants

8

14

 

No. Success

0

2 (14.3%)

 

 

 

 

LEITRIM

 

 

 

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1994

No. Applicants

9

13

 

No. Success

0

1 (7.7%)

 

 

 

 

LOUTH

 

 

 

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1993

No. Applicants

18

11

 

No. Success

1 (5.6%)

0

 

 

 

 

LIMERICK COUNTY COUNCIL

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1994

No. Applicants

20

18

 

No. Success

0

1 (5.6%)

 

 

 

 

1994

No. Applicants

7

1

 

No. Success

2 (28.6%)

0

 

 

 

 

1995

No. Applicants

2

1

 

No. Success

1 (50%)

0

 

 

 

 

LIMERICK CORPORATION

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1993

No. Applicants

10

23

 

No. Success

0

2 (8.7%)

 

 

 

 

MEATH

 

 

 

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1993

No.Applicants

8

5

 

No.Success

1 (12.5%)

0

 

 

 

 

1994

No.Applicants

27

10

 

No.Success

0

1 (10%)

 

 

 

 

MONAGHAN

 

 

 

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1993

No. Applicants

6

6

 

No. Success

0

0

 

 

 

 

1993

No. Applicants

14

10

 

No. Success

0

2 (20%)

 

 

 

 

OFFALY

 

 

 

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1994

No. Applicants

10

14

 

No. Success

1 (10%)

0

 

 

 

 

ROSCOMMON

 

 

 

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1993

No. Applicants

10

13

 

No.Success

3 (30%)

0

 

 

 

 

1995

No.Applicants

9

19

 

No. Success

0

2 (10.5%)

 

 

 

 

SLIGO

 

 

 

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1994

No. Applicants

6

5

 

No. Success

1 (16.7%)

0

 

 

 

 

1994

No. Applicants

2

2

 

No. Success

1 (50%)

1 (50%)

 

 

 

 

SOUTH DUBLIN

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1994

No. Applicants

21

32

 

No.Success

1 (4.8%)

3 (9.4%)

 

 

 

 

TIPPERARY NR

 

 

 

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1993

No. Applicants

20

20

 

No.Success

1 (5%)

0

 

 

 

 

1994

No.Applicants

13

17

 

No.Success

1 (7.7%)

1 (5.9%)

 

 

 

 

TIPPERARY SR

 

 

 

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1992

No. Applicants

13

21

 

No. Success

0

1 (4.8%)

 

 

 

 

WATERFORD COUNTY COUNCIL

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1992

No. Applicants

2

1

 

No. Success

0

1 (100%)

 

 

 

 

WATERFORD CORPORATION

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1994

No. Applicants

14

8

 

No. Success

1 (7.2%)

0

 

 

 

 

WEXFORD

 

 

 

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1993

No.Applicants

2

3

 

No.Success

1 (50%)

1 (33.3%)

 

 

 

 

1994

No.Applicants

2

5

 

No.Success

0

1 (20%)

 

 

 

 

1995

No.Applicants

15

12

 

No.Success

1 (6.7%)

1 (8.3%)

 

 

 

 

WICKLOW

 

 

 

YEAR

 

MALE

FEMALE

1993

No. Applicants

2

2

 

No. Success

1 (50%)

0

 

 

 

 

1994

No. Applicants

8

11

 

No. Success

2 (25%)

0

 

 

 

 

TABLE 5:7 TOTALS: STAFF OFFICERS APPLICANTS & SUCCESSES BY YEAR*


1992*

 

 

 

 

TOTAL

MALE

FEMALE

No. Applicants

351

173

178

No. Success

34

16 (9.3%)

18 (10.1%)

 

 

 

 

1993

 

 

 

 

TOTAL

MALE

FEMALE

No. Applicants

473

247

226

No. Success

54

28 (11.3%)

26 (11.5%)

 

 

 

 

1994

 

 

 

 

TOTAL

MALE

FEMALE

No. Applicants

496

262

234

No. Success

46

22 (8.4%)

24 (10.3%)

 

 

 

 

1995

 

 

 

 

TOTAL

MALE

FEMALE

No. Applicants

139

76

64

No. Success

11

6 (7.9%)

5 (7.8%)

 

 

 

 

Gendered outcome

Of the 58 competitions for Staff Officers noted in Table 5:6 above, 3 resulted in no appointments. All competitions had a t least one but often more than one female applicant. 19 competitions did not appoint any women to the post and 19 did not appoint any men to the post, while the remaining 17 competitions appointed both men and women. Not surprisingly, the success rate of women or men reflect the overall gender profile of the County Council or Corporation. On a more positive note, the overall success rate of women was equal or higher than than of men overall from 1992 to 1995.


Promotional Criteria for Promotion to Staff Officer

Given the lower success rate for women in some Corporations and County Councils, one must ask what are the criteria for appointment?


(1) Interview performance: all eligible candidates are called for interview which is in practice a form of assessment.


(2) Experience: range of experience within the organisation, previous job assignments.


Length of service requirement: until the late seventies mandatary service in lower grades before applying for promotion was lengthy. A Clerk Typist had to wait for eleven years before they got to their maximum grade and could compete for internal Clerical Officer competitions. One had to have five years service as Clerical Officer before applying for a position as Staff Officer.


(3) Knowledge of Local Authorities gained via private study or special Institute of Public Administration courses.


Geographical mobility may be an indirect requirement as it affords an opportunity to compete for a job in another Local Authority.


Interview

The interview is a form of assessment. For promotion to grade five posts it essentially takes the form of an oral examination in Local Government organisation and law. The kinds of questions asked reflected the expertise of the board, rather than that of the applicant for the available post. Applicants were expected to know all aspects of Local Government. Some respondents said the questions were often very detailed and specific. Applicants had no prior knowledge of who was on the interview board. This was ensured by the interview boards not meeting in advance so that their composition would not be known.


Preparation For Interviews

Given the ‘oral examination’ nature of the interview for grade five applicants had to do considerable study prior to the interviews. This was either done by private study or in study groups. Some respondents took Institute of Public Administration courses, others simply “got out the books and got their heads down”. The extent of study required often necessitated taking leave for study purposes and working late at night or at weekends.


Such study focused on Local Government legislation and its enactment. The Instutute of Public Administration’s diploma course was considered a good basis for advancement in the past and it covered areas likely to come up in interviews. Study groups in the workplace and extensive use of the Local Authority library was essential for success. The emphasis in these interviews was factual and detailed, the content was diverse and somewhat unpredictable. As mentioned above the subject matter of the questions asked often was a reflection of the interests of those on the interview board rather than of the job requirement itself. This often meant that an employee with limited experience was disadvantaged. A little of everything was a better bet. For many, the best way to learn was to practice by applying for positions and attending numerous interviews.


Career Orientation

Women in the past were not even exposed to the concept of a career and given the absence of female role models in senior positions, they never envisaged themselves as candidates for senior posts. In addition even getting to a grade 5 was a huge achievement, comparatively speaking, for a woman. As one respondent said, your income almost doubled and “you could buy a car then”. This was because promotion to a grade 5 was very difficult for women to achieve in the past when the career ladder was shorter than it is now and when there were fewer grade 5 posts. Women who were successful in reaching this level stood apart and were seen as quite exceptional. Over the years, the status of a grade 5 has declined and new more senior posts (grade 6 and 7) have been initiated. Yet the lower success rate of women in the competitions for these ‘new’ posts is depressing and suggests that in many Local Authorities, traditional attitudes to women still predominate.


Traditional Practices

Women in the past were less likely to develop a strong career orientation early in their working lives. Typically, some having enjoyed a good social life for a few years, found themselves stuck at a Clerical Officer level. If they had no children and began to realise that there were going to remain in employment for longer, they began to think about doing further study or a degree and then began seeking promotion. Those now in middle management achieved grade 5 at a relatively early age. However, given the few women in that grade, this in the past was a considerable accomplishment for a woman, and given the interview preparation required it was a considerable achievement.


Resting in Grade 5

Having achieved a grade 5 post many then rested in that position often in fact until they were encouraged by a senior staff member to go forward for the next position. Going beyond grade five is a major move for women as the tables indicate. For those women who have achieved higher grades, they worked their way up in a gradual way, one grade at a time. They also tended to do better on average than men when given place in order of merit in a competition. This suggests that women who compete are better than men. Indeed it may well be that women have to be objectively ‘better’ to be considered equal to their male colleagues.


New Grades: Longer Career Ladders and Some Element of Change

As mentioned above, since the late seventies new grades have been introduced, so that as we have seen there is now a grade 6 called a Senior Staff Officer, and a grade seven, Administrative Officer which is really considered very senior. As was seen from tables in previous chapters, younger women are now far more likely to apply for promotion but still have lower rates of success in many Local Authorities, despite the diminution of the hierarchical status of Staff Officer There is also a discernible urban /rural divide with larger Corporations affording greater opportunities for women than smaller authorities.


Conclusions

Now almost half of all Staff Officers are female and this represents a distinct change from the past when one found only a few female Staff Officers. However, this more egalitarian development has been offset by the extension of the career ladder which is now a longer one. Comparatively, the status of a Staff Officer is not as high as it was in the past and one has more grades to negotiate to reach the top. We saw that in the more senior posts the representation of women declines as one ascends the hierarchy.


But one must be encouraged by the equal representation of women at Staff Offcier levels. For some that will be the apex of an already long career in Local Authorities, for others a middle grade that will lead to future promotion, and will over time bring bring about a greater gender equity in more senior posts.


Case Study

I will now give one case study of a woman who joined the Local Authorities as a Clerk Typist in 1956 who is now in a grade 5 (Staff Officer) post. It is important to note how her ‘job’ profile is rather different from the ‘career profile’ of successful men. She does represent an example of a female employee who appears to have been discriminated against in the past.


MS. A

Ms. A was recruited to the County Council as a Clerk Typist in 1956, it took her fourteen years service before she became a Clerical Officer. She became a Staff Officer in 1975. This is equivalent to a grade five. She acted in the next grade but did not get the job when she applied for it. She subsequently acted in grade 6 but did not get that post either when it was approved. The permanent post was filled by a man who is now at a more senior grade in the organisation. She is still in a grade five position. Her responsibilities at all stages were very extensive. She had attained her IPA qualifications, and got two degrees, including one in law yet she was not successful in getting promotion.


She felt that the interviewers’ responses to her qualifications were rather negative, her own opinion was that having more qualifications than those on the interview board was not an advantage. Again she did not know why she was unsuccessful in a grade 6 competition in 1984. Her IPA qualification and two degrees, as she said:


“never seemed to have any bearing …maybe I wasn’t able to perform on the day”.


She said she would not go for any further promotional competitions:


“I couldn’t psychologically accept failure at my age”.


This woman was a candidate when the Local Authorities had even fewer women in supervisory positions and management posts. Despite her obviously exceptional qualifications and merits she remained stuck for years in the same grade irrespective of the increased number of both supervisory and managerial posts. She had acted (presumably competently) in more senior positions for a number of years yet was not given the post when it was made permanent. Her career report characterises the traditional treatment of women in the past, where being male was an essential requirement of senior posts.


Variation By County

Table 1:2 from page 4 is in inserted again here to show the variation in gender balance that exists between Local Authorities.


Gender Distribution in Management by County

Table 1:2 GENDER DISTRIBUTION WITHIN TOTAL STAFF IN LEVELS: SENIOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, PRINCIPAL OFFICER, ASST. PRINCIPAL OFFICER, SENIOR STAFF OFFICER & STAFF OFFICER*

COUNTY

MALE

FEMALE

CAVAN

6 (75%)

2 (25%)

CARLOW

7 (100%)

0 (0%)

CORK COUNTY COUNCIL

38 (76%)

12 (24%)

CORK CORPORATION

17 (60.7%)

11 (39.3%)

CLARE

8 (66.67%)

4 (33.33%)

DONEGAL

15 (88.24%)

2 (11.76%)

DROGHEDA

3 (75%)

1 (25%)

DUBLIN

156 (64.5%)

86 (35.5%)

DUNDALK

2 (50%)

2 (50%)

DUNLAOIRE\RATHDOWN

41 (53.9%)

35 (46.1%)

FINGAL

51 (68%)

24 (32%)

GALWAY CORPORATION

6 (75%)

2 (25%)

GALWAY CO. COUNCIL

10 (47.6%)

11 (52.4%)

KERRY

15(83.3%)

3 (16.7%)

KILDARE

8 (57.14%)

6 (42.86%)

KILKENNY

7 (87.5%)

1 (12.5%)

LAOIS

7 (63.65%)

4 (36.35%)

LEITRIM

4 (44.44%)

5 (55.56%)

LIMERICK CO. COUNCIL

13 (72.22%)

5 (27.78%)

LIMERICK CORP.

8 (44.44%)

10 (55.56%)

LONGFORD

5 (83.33%)

1 (16.67%)

LOUTH

5 (55.56%)

4 (44.44%)

MEATH

10 (71.4%)

4 (28.6%)

MAYO

12 (80%)

3 (20%)

MONAGHAN

5 (55.56%)

4 (44.44%)

OFFALY

5 (83.33%)

1 (16.67%)

ROSCOMMON

9 (69.23%)

4 (30.77%)

SLIGO

7 (70%)

3 (30%)

SOUTH DUBLIN

41 (53.9%)

35 (46.1%)

TIPPERARY NR

5 (41.7%)

7 (58.3%)

TIPPERARY SR

14 (77.78%)

4 (22.22%)

WATERFORD CO. COUNCIL

11 (91.67%)

1 (8.33%)

WATERFORD CORP.

9 (81.81%)

2 (18.18%)

WEXFORD

10 (62.5%)

6 (37.5%)

WESTMEATH

12 (100%)

0 (0%)

WICKLOW

13 (81.25%)

3 (18.75%)

TOTAL

595 (65.9%)

308 (34.1%)

They can be re-grouped in a different way classified in terms of the proportion of women in each. Five categories can be identified: (1) Male exclusive; (2) Male dominant; (3) Modified Male dominant: (4) Modified female presence and (5) Significant female presence. Those counties that are male exclusive with no women even in middle management are: Westmeath and Carlow. This Table can be seen in Appendix 2.


Chapter Six

Gender Similarities and Differences

In studies of gender differences in management, managers tend to explain the absence of women in senior posts as a reflection of male-female differences. This study wished to investigate such gender differences. Overall, as the frequency tables (see Appendix 1) show there were few statistically significant differences between the sample of men and women who returned questionnaires.


Marital Status and No. of Children

87.6% of men in the sample are married (Q4.) whereas only 57.1% of women were with 40% of them being single. This large percentage of single women is also reflected in the significantly larger proportion of women with no children than men (Q5.), 60% in comparison to only 20.5% of men. The high number of men with children may also a reflection of the high percentage who have a spouse who is a full time housewife (Q7.), 44.3%. Whereas for those women who are married it is mainly to a spouse who is employed full time (82.5%).


Childcare

The number of workers who are parents using a childminder is substantial (Q10). 43.5% of women employed one whilst only 18.1% of men did. This can be explained by considering the high number of men who have spouses who are full time housewives (see Q7.) therefore not needing to employ childminding services.


Educational Qualifications

The data from the postal survey reveals the qualifications of those who returned the questionnaires with 20% of males and 10% of females having a Diploma in Public Administration and 11% of women and 8% of men having a degree in Public Administration. One woman and one man had a Masters in Public Administration. 14% of women as compared with 5% of men had a B.A degree, and 5% of men and 1% of women had a B.Comm/Business Studies degree. 4% of women and 3% of men were Chartered accountants. One man had an MBA and one man and two women had Degrees in Law.


Overall in the sample when asked if they had attained any of a selection of further qualifications since joining the Local Authority women had a slightly higher level of achievement. 14% of the women attained a B.A. Degree since joining compared to only 4.6% of the men (Q54). The men had a higher level of achievement in both the Diploma in Public Administration,(20.8% in comparison to the female 10.1%), and in the business qualifications (4.5% compared with 1%) (Q54.). This tendency toward the business area for males though is offset by a higher percentage of women attaining a Chartered Accountancy qualification, 4% compared to 2.6% for men (Q54.).


This level of qualification achievement is encouraging for both sexes and with women achieving knowledge in areas such as accountancy may result in helping to balance the gender representation in the higher grades of Local Authorities.


Men More Likely To Take Courses

When asked for details on courses that respondents had taken since joining the Local Authority men were overall more likely to have taken part (Q57.).Human Resouce Management, Office Management, Strategic Management, Personnel Development, Team Development and Effective Communications courses all had a substantially higher participation rate for men. This may be due to their higher positions in the Authority and therefore not only having a higher use for the subjects covered but also easier access to information about the courses and actual participation.


Women did outnumber men on three of the courses listed French, Word Processing and Assertiveness training (Q57). The first two reflecting sex stereotypes but the latter showing an encouraging level of desire among women to improve their situation and abilities within the workplace.


Availability of Information on Courses

The perceived availability of information on courses did show up some differences between the genders with a higher portion of the male sample seeing the information as freely and equally available to everyone. 62.4% of them saying that courses were advertised on noticeboards in their Local Authority (Q59.) and 20% of them responding that each worker was given the information individually (Q60.). The corresponding figures for female respondents was 54.5% and 17.5% respectively.


The females on the other hand exceeded the males in expressing the view that only some people were notified about upcoming courses (Q61.), 67% saying this was so compared to only 55.3% of male respondents. These differences are substantial when trying to remove the perceived barriers to equal opportunity in any organization such as a Local Authority.


Q59.



Courses advertised on boards

TOTAL

MALE

FEMALE

Yes

153(59.3%)

98 (62.4%)

55 (54.5%)

No

105 (40.7%)

59 (37.6%)

46 (45.5%)

Q60.



Notices of courses given to individuals

TOTAL

MALE

FEMALE

Yes

50 (19%)

32 (20%)

18 (17.5%)

No

213 (81%)

128 (80%)

85 (82.5%)

Q61.



Information on courses only given to some people

TOTAL

MALE

FEMALE

Yes

148 (59.9%)

83 (55.3%)

65 (67%)

No

99 (41.1%)

67 (44.7%)

32 (33%)

Preparation for Interviews

The data also reveals considerable uniformity in preparation for interviews : over 90% read about Local Government issues in newspapers, over 80% talked to seniors about job requirements, over 80% read Local authority reports and researched other sectors of Local Authority in preparation for interviews. Over 80% of men and almost 90% of women did a lot of private study on Local authority legislation, 67% of men and 80% of women studied at weekends and 10% of both men and women took a week off to prepare and study for the interview.


In general then, interview preparation was taken very seriously by all staff. The in-depth interviews showed that women would only go for promotion ‘provided they were ready for it’. The survey data shows that the number of years spent in the recruitment grade before applying for promotion for the first time expresses a wide range of years but a cluster for both genders between two and five years. The male sample showed a slightly earlier tendency toward application so it is probably not surprising that the survey returns showed that they were less likely to be successful at their first attempt: 43% of women and 25% of men. However, this difference is not very pronounced among the survey respondents.


Interview Boards and Content

The composition of boards -all male- was probably more threatening to women than to men. There may well have been some link between the mentoring system and achievement at interview. There was a network of Managers interviewing each others’ staff so how you were viewed by those in senior positions was important. The composition of the actual board and their interests was also likely to have had an impact on interview content. Many applicants described the boards in the past as being unprofessionally run. The interrogative fact based type of interview was very disconcerting. The in-depth interviews revealed a general perception that interview procedures were now conducted on a more professional basis in Local Authorities, this view is supported by the survey data too. Overall, the postal survey revealed that slightly more men (64%) than women (58%) felt they had done justice to themselves at their last promotional interviews. It is important to note here that although a small majority of the sample viewed interviews as the best means of selection for promotion a significant 46% for both genders felt dissatisfaction with this method. Having expressed this substantial level of dissatisfaction with the interview selection process 91% of both genders felt that it was possible to train to improve one’s interview skills.


Sexist Comments

The questionnaire sought to find out whether during their careers in Local Authorities they had ever experienced sexist questions or remarks at interviews. 4% of the men and 16% of the women had had such experiences. Although relatively low the rate of sexist remarks experienced by both male and females is significant due to the extreme adverse effects such comments can have. With women experiencing four times more sexist comments than men it must be seen as another deterrent to equal participation rates.


Gender Composition of Interview Boards:

Traditionally, all interview boards in the past were male, over time however there has been a gradual increase in the proportion of women. For Staff Officers competitions held between 1992 and 1995, only 36% had at least one female board member.


A few respondents interviewed remembered the one occasion (in the last two years) they had been interviewed by a woman and here they found her questions broader, more relevant and stated that they were given a better chance to demonstrate their views. These accounts of past interviews suggest that the overall context in which one performs can vary between boards and that gendered imbalances might have negative consequences for women. It is also likely that the idea of men as authority figures has a greater impact on women than on men.


The low representation of women on interview boards has been alluded to in the report already. The survey returns show that in the case of the last promotional competition entered, 42% of male respondents and 62% of females said there were no women on the interview boards. 73% of men as compared with 55% of women had themselves sat on an interview board. 65% of women who responded to the questionnaire and 44% of men said that there should be a woman on all interview boards.


The majority of interview boards experienced by those in the survey had neither women nor members known to the interviewee for both genders. Yet there was a tendency for more women to have experienced interview boards with at least one woman member, 44% for women and only 35% for men. Conversly men were slightly more likely to have known at least one board member personally, 50% for males and only 38% for the female sample.


Interview Performance and Feedback.

Unsuccessful applicants got no interview feedback whereas successful ones were given their place on a panel, so they knew how they ranked vis a vis every one else. Women did learn from their own experience at interviews what questions they were likely to be asked. In practice, going for interview seemed to be the only way to learn. However, repetitive failure did undermine their self confidence. This lack of feedback was serious for women, especially for those who had acted in positions or grades and were subsequently turned down for the post when it was advertised. It also meant that interviews were painful and not always learning experiences.


Women interviewed were well able to appraise their own interview performances. Older women said that on one or two occasions they simply did not “perform well on the day”, they were nervous. In fact they would refer to others who were very good at presenting themselves at interview. Others found that certain questions were almost an insult to people who were working for years in County Councils. They would have preferred a broader interview content. Among those who were unsuccessful there was never a perception that they could have actually trained for interviews and repeated failures effectively “cooled them off”.


Whether or not women in the past did not perform well at interview is difficult to establish. Interviews with women suggest that women were generally more likely to be nervous when faced with a panel of three men. The nature of the interview was even more threatening. Many women would have preferred a written examination. However, it is equally likely that as women, they were discriminated against when it came to permanent appointments.


Gender Differences in Performance

Asked about gender differences at interview performance women who had served on boards felt that often women performed well but many did not do justice to themselves when being interviewed for grade five positions. Men were more confident and less self critical and better at presenting themselves. Dress was easier for men than for women. If women were nervous, their voices were raised and they spoke in a higher tone. They might develop a nervous rash and these effects produced by nervousness militated against them. However, men interviewed were of the opinion that many women were better at presenting themselves at interview than men.


Perception of Equal Treatment in Promotion

87% of both men and women who responded in the survey thought that promotion was likely to be given to the best candidate irrespective of sex. However, 12% of women thought promotion more likely to be given to a man, while 12% of men though it more likely to be given to a woman.


Absence of Mentors in the Past

Older women interviewed in the Staff Officer grades at present said that they did not have mentors when they were Clerical Officers who might have encouraged them to apply for promotion or advise them what to study in the way men had. This advice gave men an earlier orientation to their career development. A career was seen as an essential aspect of men’s jobs but not for women. It is not surprising that men did not mentor women, given the traditional roles allocated to women in the past. Most senior men had wives who were full time housewives and so were not likely to see women’s role as being in the workplace.


Women Now Have Mentors

However, the survey returns show that 70% of women as compared with 62% of men had mentors. Of those who had mentors, 90% of men as compared with 80% of women had mentors who were their superiors in Local Authorities. This finding indicates that mentoring is no longer as gender specific as it was in the past and it augers well for gender equity in the future.


The Absence of Gender Differences in Career Orientation

The survey data revealed that gender differences in career orientation are no longer apparent. 80% of women as compared with 70% of men said they would apply for promotion in the next three years. 57% of women as compared with 55% of men said they liked challenges. 48% of men and 47% of women wanted to take on more responsibility. 35% of women and 38% of men would like to get to a senior management position.


Working Hours

While 51% of women as compared with 40% of men worked 40 hours a week, 14% of women as contrasted with 5% of men worked over 70 hours a week. This tendency for women to work longer hours than men has been found in other studies and it indicates that women often have to work harder and be higher achieving to be considered equal to men. Over 9% of the women said they worked eighty hours or more whereas only 1.2% of the men did. Also women made up a higher percentage of those who worked approximately 30 hours each week, 4.8% of women and 1.9% of men. The variation between genders is significant and needs to be looked at in more detail than is possible here.


Q125.



Average no. of hrs worked per week

TOTAL

MALE

FEMALE

Approx.30

8 (3%)

3 (1.9%)

5 (4.8%)

Approx 40

108 (41.1%)

59 (37.4%)

49 (46.7%)

Approx 50

88 (33.5%)

61 (38.6%)

27 (4.8%)

Approx 60

36 (13.7%)

27 (17.1%)

9 (8.6%)

Approx 70

11 (4.2%)

6 (3.8%)

5 (4.8%)

Approx.80

5 (1.9%)

1 (.6%)

4 (3.8%)

More than 80

7 (2.7%)

1 (.6%)

6 (5.7%)

Respondents replied to the question of the frequency of bringing work worries ‘home with them’ with a majority answering sometimes and a larger number of men than women answering on the bottom end of the scale (Q135). 6.4% of men saying they never take worries home compared to only 2.9% of the women.


Q135.



Work worries preoccupy during leisure

TOTAL

MALE

FEMALE

Never

15 (5.7%)

12 (6.4%)

3 (2.9%)

Rarely

58 (22%)

34 (18.2%)

24 (23.1%)

Sometimes

130 (49.2%)

76 (40.6%)

54 (51.9%)

Often

57 (22%)

35 (18.7%)

22 (21.2%)

Always

4(1.5%)

3 (1.6%)

1 (.9%)

Organizational Differences

The survey questionnaire explored a number of organisational features. Men were slightly ‘more satisfied’ in their relationships with colleagues than women and were more likely to be more satisfied with their working relationship with superiors than women. They were also likely to be ‘more satisfied’ with their working relationship with subordinates. It is difficult to explain these differences but one is talking about women in supervisory and management roles where there have been few women in the past so they could be experiencing some effects of being seen as’ token’ women because as women they are not conforming to traditional stereotypes.


Somewhat more disconcerting is the lower proportion of women than of men -14% as compared with 28% -who are very satisfied with their access to information within the organization. 44% of women compared to 30% of men expressed total dissatisfaction with this area again highlighting the barriers that are often present for women in the organization.


There appeared to be a discrepancy between the perceived existence of job specifications with 67.8% of males saying they were available and only 39.4% of women saying this was so (Q108).


Q108.


Job specifications available

TOTAL

MALE

FEMALE

Yes

138 (56.8%)

101 (67.8%)

37 (39.4%)

No

105 (43.2%)

48 (32.2%)

57 (60.6%)

Satisfaction with Present Position and Future Career Prospects

There are also slight differences between male and female respondents as regards the way in which their performance is assessed for promotion and on the organizations use of their skills. Overall the sample of men (who afterall include more respondents from higher grades) are overall ‘more satisfied’ than women.


A large majority of the sample, 79.7%, responded that the position they were currently in the Local Authority was not the highest that they aspired to. A higher proportion of women than men expressed this view, 88% compared to 74.5%. This may be due to the higher grades that men are in and therefore have a better level of satisfaction with their position. Nevertheless the high level of ambition is encouraging for both sexes. This is further emphasized in the rating on a scale of 1-5 given in response to the level of optimism felt with respect to future career prospects (Q67). Both genders have a majority on the top half of the scale expressing optimism. Q136 to 141 involved the respondents gauging their level of satisfaction with certain aspects of their experience in the Local Authority.


Personality Differences

Questions 142 to 152 involved respondents rating themselves on a scale of 1 to 5 with respect to certain aspects of their personality. Again there was no significant difference between the genders on these issues thus highlighting again the irrelevance of arguments that male and female attitudes to work differ substantially. The only question that did uncover a difference was that dealing with decision making (Q148.). A substantially lower percentage of women than men expressed a feeling of being able to make decisions easily, 41.3% of men compared to 23.8% of women, this may reflect a lack of confidence in the acceptance of the decisions a female may make in the LA by other workers.


Statistically Significant Differences Between Men and Women

The postal respondents were all drawn from Staff Officer level and higher so it is not surprising that women emerged as similar to men on most variables. There were however, some important and statistically significant differences.


Recruitment Grade

Both genders were most likely to be initially recruited as Clerical Officers, 93% of men and 75% of women. Women however, were also largely recruited at the lower level of Clerk Typist/Assistant, 20% of all female respondents, whereas only 1.2% of male respondents were recruited at this grade.Further and consistent with findings in earlier sections of this report, men were more likely to be recruited to higher level posts initially.


Successful Attempt at First Promotion

As noted earlier, women were more likely to be successful in their first promotion. This is partly explained by their move from Clerical Assistant to Clerical Officer grade and partly by their spending slightly longer in the first grade than their male colleagues.


Mobility Between Local Authorities

Men were more likely to have moved and to have moved more often from one Local Authority to another. As the table indicates, a smaller number of women moved. Three of the sample of men and one woman moved Local Authorities eight times. Three men moved nine times. This confirms the importance of geographical mobility as indicated in chapter 2. The only exception are staff in large urban corporations where job opportunities are likely to arise within a Corporation.


Moving Family Home

As might be expected, men were also more likely to move family home, up to nine home moves were recorded by four men, with five moves recorded by one female.


Children

One of the largest and statistically significant differences between men and women was the number of children. 61% of women as contrasted with only 20% of men had no children. 3% of women had 4 children as compared with 12% of men and 10% of men had more than five children. This higher level of childlessness is not surprising and was found in an earlier study of senior Civil Servants.


From the data available, the precise nature of this interaction is difficult to explain. Firstly, having children for men is a distinctly different experience than for women as it is the men’s wives who have the children. Men are more likely to have a full-time house-spouse than women: 44% of men as contrasted with 12% of women. Women’s spouses were more likely to be employed full-time (83%) than men’s (34%) and men’s spouses were more likely to be employed part-time than women’s.


Information was not sought in the questionnaire on the factors which explained variation in the number of children. Older senior female employees were less likely to have children. Younger married women had sometimes deferred having children. Some respondents who had recently had children said that their geographical mobility would be subsequently more restricted.


Women without children might have been able to devote more time to study for promotion. Alternatively they could have been less discriminated against less than mothers. However, it is not the case that there are no mothers in senior positions, but they are more likely to be found in larger urban Corporations. Women in senior posts with children who were interviewed were able to devote a lot of time and energy to their careers. They found the time when their children were small was the most difficult period to manage. Not surprisingly they were more likely to encourage their partners to share childcare. Some have very adaptive and supportive husbands who take care of their children full-time.


However, this finding does raise the question of the incompatibility between children and a career in a traditional society which has tended to discriminate against women often on the basis of their perceived family commitments. Such concerns would be better addressed by examining childcare facilities which are of course almost non-existent in the majority of Local Authorities.


The Kerry study of Promotional Patterns of Female staff makes a useful contribution to this issue. The staff at senior management level saw domestic responsibilities as a barrier for women to full participation at a more senior level, yet the women themselves stressed that they did not consider their domestic responsibilities incompatible with the responsibilities of senior posts. Further this negative attitude of senior staff to women tended to undermine women’s self-confidence. Thus an organizational ethos which sees ‘domestic commitments’ as an inevitable barrier to women performing at a senior level can result in discriminatory practices which are now illegal.


Conclusion

An organizational ethos which is inspired by an equitable approach to recruitment and selection is desirable and mandatory. While the figures presented in this report do not conclusively prove that a traditional negative attitude to women as potential managers dominates, it does suggest that this may well be the case in those County Councils where women are absent or barely represented in middle and senior management. The role of top management and especially that of the City/County Manager is extremely important in bringing about equal opportunities in organizations.


Some might explain the absence of women by the reluctance of women to apply for such posts but that is no longer the case in middle management. However, if women are not successful in competitions then they may well be reluctant to apply for future promotion, because they feel they were discriminated against in the past. As the postal questionnaire reveals, there are now more similarities than differences between men and women in terms of their career orientation and ambition. It is important that they are equitably treated in the promotional system.


Chapter 7

Conclusion and Recommendations

This report is based on a study designed to depict and explain the absence of women from top posts, to investigate the extent to which there are improvements in the gender composition of middle management and to make recommendations to ensure equal opportunities for all staff including women in the future.


The research presented here was based on (1) qualitative in-depth interviews with Local Authority staff at all levels drawn from urban and rural councils and corporations and interviews with those who served on interview boards; (2) on gender audits of staff by grade collected from Local Authorities; (3) a gender breakdown of competitions for posts organised by the Local Appointments Commission and from Local Authorities and, (4) on data collected from a survey of Local Authority staff using postal questionnaires.


Vertical Segregation

Table 1 shows that there are no women in the most senior grades of City and County Managers and Assistant City and County Managers. At the next level there are only two women County Secretaries and one woman Finance Officer. The three of these were appointed in 1994. The table the slightly higher representation of women in middle management and their greater representation in supervisory posts.


TABLE 1:1


Distribution of Women and Men in Senior Administrative Grades 1995


POSITION

TOTAL

MALE

FEMALE

Co.\City Manager

33

33 (100%)

0

Assistant Co.\City Manager

27

27 (100%)

0

County Secretary

26

24 (92.3%)

2 (7.7%)

Finance Officer

27

26 (96.3%)

1 (3.7%)

Senior Administrative Officer

23

22 (95.7%)

1 (4.3%)

Administrative Officer

156

134 (85.9%)

22 (14.1%)

Principal Officer

7

7 (100%)

0

Assistant Principal Officer

15

14 (93.3%)

1 (6.7%)

Senior Staff Officer

282

214 (75.9%)

68 (24.1%)

Staff Officer

423

215 (50.8%)

208 (49.2%)

TOTAL

1019

716 (70.3%)

303 (29.7%)

The Local Appointments Commission

The Local Appointments Commission (LAC) manage those for the following grades: City and County Managers, Assistant City and County Managers and those of Finance Officers and County Secretaries. Each Local Authority is now responsible for their own recruitment and promotion for posts below those appointed by LAC


Lack of Female Applicants For Most Senior Posts

The Local Appointments Commission had no female applicants for most senior Local Authority posts in 1987, 1989 or 1990. In 1991 there was one female candidate for an Area Manager post in Dublin Co. Council. There were no female applicants in 1992 for two competitions for County Managers. In the 1993 competition there was only one women applicant. In 1994 there was only one woman applicant. The Assistant County/City Manager/Personnel Officer competition in 1994 attracted 5 female candidates, one of whom was invited for interview. She was not appointed.


Over time it appears that certain experiences, largely defined as ‘administration in Local Government’, have been viewed as central to the job. While recruitment for these top positions is open competition selection practices in the past have favoured internal candidates. Top managers have been largely drawn from the internal Local Authorities labour market.


First Women Appointed as County Secretary

A review of the 1994 competitions shows that three of the four competitions for County Secretary attracted women applicants. Two were appointed, thereby creating a new precedence by the appointment of 2 women to these high level posts.


Finance Officer

There was one woman appointed to the position of Finance Officer in 1993. In 1994, a woman was considered for appointment but she is the same female so there is still only one female Finance Officer.


Overall Review of Candidature for Most Senior Posts

Based on interviews with Local Appointments Commission staff there is a dominant view that the national competition pool for top positions is small and there is a sense that emergent talent becomes known. This must have been crucially so in the past when all Local Authority applicants would have applied to the LAC and been interviewed by them for posts attained to date. However, at the present time, there may be a sense of a self-fulfilling prophecy inherent in this view about the pool of available candidates. If it is understood that they must be drawn from the Local Authority structures then the pool is small, if they do not have to be drawn then it may well be that local authorities are failing to attract ‘outside’ talent. In addition the almost complete lack of female applicants contributes directly to the low candidature. However, even when women compete, they have not been very successful in the past. Without access to the competition notes, it is difficult to know why women are not more successful.


Composition of Interview Boards

A minimum of two experts are usually appointed to the interview/selection board in addition to an independent chairman (usually a man). The post of chairman is an honorary one and is not remunerated. However, this has not always been feasible and there has been an increase in the extent to which fee paid chairpersons are used. Such fee paying chairmen are often retired public sector employees. Those invited are drawn from professional bodies, universities, and from the public and private sector. In the case of competition for County Managers, for instance, there is a lay chairman usually a retired County Manager, a County Manager (from another Authority), a manager from a public or private sector and the secretary or his representative from the Dept. of Environment and a Local Appointments Commission staff member will be in attendance.


One can see here that there is a predominance of membership drawn from the public sector. These men (in the past they were all men) are considered ‘top class managers’ who are good at interviewing and know what the requirements of the jobs are. Existing managers are classified as experts in the field competent to make sound judgments.


However, some applicants interviewed by this researcher claim that the interview boards for such positions are random and it means you can be lucky or unlucky. Balancing the chances of inside versus outside candidates is also difficult. Being known to people on the board could be an advantage or disadvantage. The survey returns showed that men were more likely to know interview board members than women in Local Authority interviews. Likewise the balance in terms of private or public sector board members might favour or disfavour ‘outsider’ candidates. Basically, the composition of a Board will affect its deliberation and its eventual selection decisions.


Gender Balance on Interview Boards

The identification of and agreement of the best candidate will reflect the composition of the board. The absence of women from such boards is therefore quite serious. While female board members in no way are thought to necessarily influence the outcome of interviews, it reflects and encourages a focus on gender equity in the entire process.


Members of the Local Appointments Commission interviewed claimed that they regularly updated their board members and included ‘new’ women but said that a valid directory of suitable women who were willing to serve on interview boards would be welcomed. At present suitable women come to their attention via newspaper reports, from contact with universities and public bodies.


Lack of Training

Given the competitive significance of the interview, it is regrettable that interview training is not mandatory for board members. Without explicit job descriptions, and the attendant identification of skills etc. it is far more likely that the interview process is subjective and unscientific. In practice this can mean that not all candidates are assessed in an identical fashion and research elsewhere shows that this can discriminate against women. The Local Appointments Commission has commenced this training in the case of interviews who recruit engineers, so it would be advisable for them to extend this training to other sectors, especially to managerial posts.


Women in Middle Management

As can be seen in chapter one, few women even entered the competitions for top posts, as few were eligible to apply from Local Authorities. In order to reaching this eligibility level, one must move up to a middle management grade in a local authority and have successfully competed for promotion in their local and internal competitions. In chapter 3 the low representation of women in middle management was evident.


Vertical Segregation in Local Authorities: Senior Administrative Officers

There is only one woman at Senior Administrative Officer level and twenty two at Administrative Officer level. There are no women Principal Officers and only 1 Assistant Principal Officer. However only large Local Authorities have such posts, with Dublin Corporation being the only Local Authority with Principal and Assistant Principal Officers.


Administrative Officer

The next grade of Administrative Officer includes 14% of women (Table 3:5), though they are only found in the large urban corporations. There are more Administrative Officer posts available in these corporations which overall have more senior posts. While men dominate the most senior positions, a few women have moved up to middle management.


Administrative Officer Competitions

A review of the competitions for Administrative Officer posts by county shows that between 1992 and 1995, 46 competitions were held. Of those 38 had women applicants. Yet, the success rates for women as a whole were lower, except in the urban Corporations, as Table 4:3 indicates. These competitions resulted in the appointment of 15 women candidates


Survey Data on Success at Interviews

A good performance at interview and a proven record of achievement were considered the two most important traits for promotion to senior posts by survey respondents. More women (27%) stressed performance at interview than men (23%), whereas more men (27%) rated ‘proven record of achievement’ as the most important. The majority of the sample reported that the last interview they did was conducted professionally (89% of men and women). Yet only half the total sample of men and women agreed that interviews were the best way of selecting people for positions. With only approximately 60% of the sample saying that they did justice to themselves in the last interview they attended. Although 91% of them agreed that it was possible to train for interviews.


Gender Composition of Interview Boards

For middle management posts in the past, there were no women on the interview boards. The interview board is drawn from Local Authorities staff. For instance an interview board will be composed of the following all drawn from outside: Manager/ retired Manager, County Secretary or Administrative Officer and a Finance Officer. Virtually all of these posts are still male dominated. In the past they were also quite likely to be older men.


To an extent the requirement that those on the interview board be two levels higher than the post being competed for partly explains the low representation of women on interview boards. However, few women who I have interviewed even in senior posts have been called upon for interview service. The survey data shows that 73% of men as contrasted with only 55% of women had ever sat on an interview board.


This finding suggests that women are not asked as often as men to sit on interview boards.


Supervisory Posts: Senior Staff Officers and Staff Officers

Seventeen of the County Councils and Corporations have no female senior staff officer. However, there is a considerable range with Leitrim and Tipperary having 80% and 75% of Senior Staff officers female. Dublin, DunLaoire/Rathdown, Louth having 50%.


Variation By County

The gender balance however varies considerably from one County Council or Corporation to another as can be seen in Table 5:4. Monaghan and Kildare having a proportion as high as 80%; while Offaly, Westmeath and Carlow have no female Staff Officers.


In Table 5:3 the posts of Senior Staff Officer and Staff Officer are amalgamated to see the overall representation of women in supervisory posts by county and are presented in descending order. Galway County Council, Leitrim, Dundalk and Tipperary North emerge on top with between 62% and 70% of all Senior Staff Officers and Staff Officers being female while Carlow and Westmeath appear with no women in either of these grades.


Woman Friendly Counties?

Table 5.3 shows the overall success rates in Senior Staff Officer competitions for men and women over the last four years. Overall women had a slightly higher success rate in 1992 and in 1994, but a lower rate in 1993 and 1995. However these figures do not reveal the regional variation in success rates. In 31 competitions for which women entered no woman was successful. Some counties emerge showing good success rates for women: Cork, all the Dublin Councils and Corporations, Kilkenny, Laois, Leitrim and Limerick Corporation. In stark contrast Limerick County Council, Meath, Mayo, Carlow, Clare, Cork Co.Council, Donegal, Kerry, Kildare, Monaghan, Sligo, Tipperary South and Wicklow had several competitions with female candidates but did not appoint any women.


These promotional competitions are handled by the Local Authorities themselves and there may well be a more positive ethos towards women in management in some Local Authorities than in others. See appendix 2. However, in appointments to these posts there is usually only one vacancy so the job goes to either a man or a woman except in the newly created Urban Corporations where a number of appointments were made. Other studies of equal opportunities show the difficulties in appointing women to such posts when it is perceived that men are the direct losers.


Gendered Outcome

Of the 58 competitions for Staff Officer, 3 resulted in no appointments. All competitions had at least one but often more than one female applicant. 19 competitions did not appoint any women to the post and 19 did not appoint any men to the post, while the remaining 17 competitions appointed both men and women. Not surprisingly, the success rate of women or men reflect the overall gender profile of the County Council or Corporation. On a more positive note, the overall female success rate was equal higher than of men overall from 1992 to 1995.


Career Orientation

Women in the past were not even exposed to the concept of a career and given the absence of female role models in senior positions, they never envisaged themselves as candidates for senior posts. In addition even getting to a grade 5 was a huge achievement, comparatively speaking, for a woman. As one respondent said, your income almost doubled and “you could buy a car then”. This was because promotion to a grade 5 was very difficult for women to achieve in the past when the career ladder was shorter than it is now and when there were fewer grade 5 posts. Women who were successful in reaching this level stood apart and were seen as quite exceptional. Over the years, the status of a grade 5 has declined and new more senior posts (grade 6 and 7) have been initiated. Yet the lower success rate of women in the competitions for these ‘new’ posts is depressing and suggests that in many Local Authorities, traditional attitudes to women still predominate.


Interviews

The interview content for Senior Staff Officer was quite similar but more detailed than those of grade 5. The interview content often reflected the interests of those on the interview boards. Many candidates find the oral examination type interview for Staff Officer off-putting. Such knowledge is generally acquired on the job. In addition it is possible to consult the relevant legislation as required. A recent study of Promotional Patterns of Female Staff in Kerry County Council found that “the interview places undue emphasis on knowledge of the legislation, rather than on the candidate’s experience and overall suitability” (IPA:1995). Staff interviewed had a greater preference for interviews which asked what you would do in particular hypothetical situations. However, in-depth interviews revealed that interview content and style varied from one Local Authority to another. Such variation may be disadvantageous to candidates-male and female in some Local Authorities.


Conclusions

Now almost half of all Staff Officers are female and this represents a distinct change from the past when one found only a few female Staff Officers. However, this more egalitarian development has been offset by the extension of the career ladder which is now a longer one. Comparatively, the status of a Staff Officer is not as high as it was in the past and one has more grades to negotiate to reach the top. We saw that in the more senior posts the representation of women declines as one ascends the hierarchy.


But one must be encouraged by the equal representation of women at Staff Officer levels. For some that will be the apex of an already long career in Local Authorities, for others a middle grade that will lead to future promotion.


Perception of Equal Treatment in Promotion

87% of both men and women who responded in the survey thought that promotion was likely to be given to the best candidate irrespective of sex. However, 12% of women thought promotion more likely to be given to a man, while 12% of men though it more likely to be given to a woman.


Recommendations


re: Local Appointments Commission


The Local Appointments Commission has an excellent reputation and is generally considered fair and impartial. It does exist under certain restrictions as it is a recruitment agency. The following recommendations if implemented would augment its image as a fair and impartial agency and contribute further to the recruitment of the most talented staff.


1.The Local Appointments Commission should publish an annual report giving the gender breakdown of applicants for each competition and their respective success rates.


2.A special search committee may be required to encourage a greater number of applicants from a wider range of sectors to increase gender balance among applicants for senior management posts.


3.To facilitate the LAC each local authority should provide very clear job specifications for advertised posts and detail any qualifications which are mandatory as opposed to optional. In addition the personal skills and competencies necessary to carry out such a post should also be outlined in a way which enables any board member to evaluate applicants’ possession of such skills. Accurate descriptions would lead to more inclusive competition and ensure equity.


4.Each competition should be concluded by an overview of the competition in terms of its effective search, number and diversity of applicants etc. for both the outcome of the shortlisting and the interview competition. This overview should b included in the Annual Report.


5.Interview boards should not proceed without a gender balance.


6.A comprehensive directory of women who are available to sit on interview boards should be drawn up and updated regularly for internal use by the LAC.


7.Given the difficulty in getting voluntary interview board members, the expertise of management consultancy firms could be used on a temporary basis until a gender balance is available.


8.In so far as possible, each candidate should be given some indication of their performance in competitions. In that way those who performed well might be encouraged to compete again, while those who lacked relevant skills might acquire them or not continue to apply.


9.Given the workload of the Commissioners, and the growing importance of equality, it might also be appropriate to extend the number of commissioners and to include a representative from the Department of Equality and Law Reform or from the Department of Enterprise and Employment on the Commission.


10.To ensure impartiality, Chairpersons of interview boards should be selected from diverse occupational background, age and gender.


Recommendations re: Local Authorities

1.A common interview content, a uniform approach and procedures such as that used by the Local Appointments Commission is desirable. Staff who sit on interview boards should be trained in interview techniques and personnel staff should have special training to ensure equitable approach and treatment. This training should be coordinated by the Dept. of the Environment with advice from the Dept. of Equality and Law Reform.


2.This reports forms a base line audit of the position of women in management in Local Authorities. It showed considerable variation between Authorities. This variation must be addressed by the introduction of active equality policies in all Local Authorities. The responsibility for this policy should rest with the City/County Managers, operating under guidelines to be issued by the Department of the Environment.


3.Such equality policies must be continuously monitored and their effectiveness reviewed as is presently done in the Civil Service. To facilitate this, each Local Authority should publish an annual report giving a gender breakdown of applicants for each competition and their respective success rates.


4.Each Local Authority should provide very clear job specifications for advertised posts and detail any qualifications which are mandatory as opposed to optional. In addition, the personal skills and competencies necessary to carry out such a postshould be outlined in a way which enables any applicant to assess their possession of such skills. Accurate descriptions would lead to more inclusive competitions and ensure equity.


5.Formal criteria for the selection of candidates must be supplied and each candidate treated in a fair and equitable manner.


6.Each competition should be concluded by an overview of the competition in terms of its effective search, number and diversity of applicants for both the outcome of shortlisting and the interview competition. This overview should be included in the Annual report.


7.Interview boards should not proceed without a gender balance.


8.In so far as possible each candidate should be given some indication of their performance in competitions. In that way those who performed well might be encouraged to compete again, while those who lacked relevant skills might acquire them or not continue to apply.


9.It is regrettable that interview selection which is not considered the optimum form of selection process by many personnel theorists and by half the staff surveyed is still the only dominant form of competition. The possibility of using other forms of competitive selection appropriate to particular posts and similar to those used in some parts of the private sector should be considered.


10.Greater team management within the organisation should be promoted. This would improve organisational morale by giving employees better access to information on the Local Authority as a whole and by promoting the personal development of all staff.


11.Information on training and development courses should be made widely available to staff in all areas and participation actively encouraged by personnel departments.


12.Senior management in Local Authorities should be made aware that career development and job commitment are of equal importance to both sexes notwithstanding the perceived traditional roles of men and women.


* Note this table excludes top management and is based on Senior Administrative to Staff Office Grades, this information has been reclassified in Table in Appendix 2.


1 I am indebted to Frank Sheedy LAC for much of this information on functioning of Local Appointments Commission and their selection mechanisms.


* Grades included are: Administrative Officer, Senior Administrative Officer, Assistant Principal Officer, Principal Officer, Finance Officer, Personnel Officer, County Secretary, Assistant City\County Manager & County Manager


* Data from competitions held in Dundalk Urban District Council and Wicklow not included in due to lack of gender breakdown.


* Data on Kerry not included due to lack of year data


* Data on Kerry not included due to lack of year data


* Not including data from Kerry due to lack of year information


* Not including data from 1992 interviews held in Dundalk Urban District Council orFingal due to incomplete data on gender breakdown.


* Note this table excludes top management and is based on Senior Administrative to Staff Officer Grades, this information has been reclassified in Table in Appendix 2.